放射治疗和化疗对在三级护理中心治疗的局部晚期不可切除的非转移性胰腺癌患者的影响。

IF 1.3
Zarmina Alam, Satyajit Pradhan, Abhishek Shinghal, Lincoln Pujari, Akhil Kapoor, Prashanth Giridhar, Ankita Rungta Kapoor, Tanvee, Mayank Tripathi, Ashutosh Mukherji
{"title":"放射治疗和化疗对在三级护理中心治疗的局部晚期不可切除的非转移性胰腺癌患者的影响。","authors":"Zarmina Alam, Satyajit Pradhan, Abhishek Shinghal, Lincoln Pujari, Akhil Kapoor, Prashanth Giridhar, Ankita Rungta Kapoor, Tanvee, Mayank Tripathi, Ashutosh Mukherji","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1747_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is currently treated with chemotherapy (CT) alone or CT combined with radiation therapy (RT) (CT+RT). There is no robust evidence supporting one over the other. The present study compares the two treatment modalities in terms of their survival outcomes and safety profile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study includes 29 nonmetastatic, unresectable, LAPC patients who were treated with CT+RT (21 patients) or CT alone (8 patients) during November 2019 to September 2023. CT consisted of FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine-based regimens. CT+RT patients were treated with conventional (50.4 Gy/28fr) as well as hypofractionated RT dose schedules (39 Gy/13fr, 25 Gy/5fr, and 42 Gy/6fr). The primary endpoint of the study was the median overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were the median progression-free survival (PFS) and acute and late radiation-induced toxicities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 24 months, patients of CT+RT group had prolonged survival compared to patients of CT alone group with median OS of 20 months versus 7 months (P = 0.0032) and median PFS of 15 months versus 5 months (P = 0.029). The majority of toxicities in CT+RT group were Grade 1-2 around 79%. However, Grade 3 or more late event was seen only in 1 (5%) patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating radiation therapy along with CT should be the standard approach for unresectable LAPC patients improving survival with acceptable toxicities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"21 5","pages":"1000-1005"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of radiation therapy and chemotherapy in locally advanced unresectable nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer patients treated in a tertiary care center.\",\"authors\":\"Zarmina Alam, Satyajit Pradhan, Abhishek Shinghal, Lincoln Pujari, Akhil Kapoor, Prashanth Giridhar, Ankita Rungta Kapoor, Tanvee, Mayank Tripathi, Ashutosh Mukherji\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1747_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is currently treated with chemotherapy (CT) alone or CT combined with radiation therapy (RT) (CT+RT). There is no robust evidence supporting one over the other. The present study compares the two treatment modalities in terms of their survival outcomes and safety profile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study includes 29 nonmetastatic, unresectable, LAPC patients who were treated with CT+RT (21 patients) or CT alone (8 patients) during November 2019 to September 2023. CT consisted of FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine-based regimens. CT+RT patients were treated with conventional (50.4 Gy/28fr) as well as hypofractionated RT dose schedules (39 Gy/13fr, 25 Gy/5fr, and 42 Gy/6fr). The primary endpoint of the study was the median overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were the median progression-free survival (PFS) and acute and late radiation-induced toxicities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 24 months, patients of CT+RT group had prolonged survival compared to patients of CT alone group with median OS of 20 months versus 7 months (P = 0.0032) and median PFS of 15 months versus 5 months (P = 0.029). The majority of toxicities in CT+RT group were Grade 1-2 around 79%. However, Grade 3 or more late event was seen only in 1 (5%) patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating radiation therapy along with CT should be the standard approach for unresectable LAPC patients improving survival with acceptable toxicities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"21 5\",\"pages\":\"1000-1005\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1747_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1747_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)目前的治疗方法是单独化疗(CT)或CT联合放疗(RT) (CT+RT)。没有有力的证据支持哪一种优于另一种。本研究比较了两种治疗方式的生存结果和安全性。方法:回顾性研究包括29例非转移性、不可切除的LAPC患者,这些患者于2019年11月至2023年9月期间接受了CT+RT治疗(21例)或单独CT治疗(8例)。CT包括以FOLFIRINOX或吉西他滨为基础的方案。CT+RT患者接受常规(50.4 Gy/28fr)和低分割放疗剂量计划(39 Gy/13fr, 25 Gy/5fr和42 Gy/6fr)治疗。该研究的主要终点是中位总生存期(OS),次要终点是中位无进展生存期(PFS)以及急性和晚期辐射引起的毒性。结果:中位随访24个月时,CT+RT组患者的中位生存期较单独CT组患者延长,中位OS为20个月,中位OS为7个月(P = 0.0032),中位PFS为15个月,中位PFS为5个月(P = 0.029)。CT+RT组毒性以1-2级为主,约79%。然而,只有1例(5%)患者出现3级或以上的晚期事件。结论:放射联合CT治疗应成为不可切除的LAPC患者的标准治疗方法,可提高生存率,且毒性可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of radiation therapy and chemotherapy in locally advanced unresectable nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer patients treated in a tertiary care center.

Background: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is currently treated with chemotherapy (CT) alone or CT combined with radiation therapy (RT) (CT+RT). There is no robust evidence supporting one over the other. The present study compares the two treatment modalities in terms of their survival outcomes and safety profile.

Methods: The retrospective study includes 29 nonmetastatic, unresectable, LAPC patients who were treated with CT+RT (21 patients) or CT alone (8 patients) during November 2019 to September 2023. CT consisted of FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine-based regimens. CT+RT patients were treated with conventional (50.4 Gy/28fr) as well as hypofractionated RT dose schedules (39 Gy/13fr, 25 Gy/5fr, and 42 Gy/6fr). The primary endpoint of the study was the median overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were the median progression-free survival (PFS) and acute and late radiation-induced toxicities.

Results: At a median follow-up of 24 months, patients of CT+RT group had prolonged survival compared to patients of CT alone group with median OS of 20 months versus 7 months (P = 0.0032) and median PFS of 15 months versus 5 months (P = 0.029). The majority of toxicities in CT+RT group were Grade 1-2 around 79%. However, Grade 3 or more late event was seen only in 1 (5%) patient.

Conclusion: Incorporating radiation therapy along with CT should be the standard approach for unresectable LAPC patients improving survival with acceptable toxicities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信