人工智能辅助全切片图像分析在早期结、胃癌淋巴结状态预测中的应用。

IF 4.7
Katsuro Ichimasa, Shin-Ei Kudo, Yuta Kouyama, Yuki Takashina, Hyunsoo Chung, Yasuharu Maeda, Wai Phyo Lwin, Yosuke Toya, Waku Hatta, Jimmy Bok Yan So, Khay Guan Yeoh, Tetsuo Nemoto, Masashi Misawa
{"title":"人工智能辅助全切片图像分析在早期结、胃癌淋巴结状态预测中的应用。","authors":"Katsuro Ichimasa, Shin-Ei Kudo, Yuta Kouyama, Yuki Takashina, Hyunsoo Chung, Yasuharu Maeda, Wai Phyo Lwin, Yosuke Toya, Waku Hatta, Jimmy Bok Yan So, Khay Guan Yeoh, Tetsuo Nemoto, Masashi Misawa","doi":"10.1111/den.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the widespread use of advanced endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, an increasing number of early colorectal cancer (T1 CRC) and early gastric cancer (EGC) cases are now treated with endoscopic resection as the first-line approach. However, the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM)-approximately 10% in T1 CRC and 5%-10% in EGC-necessitates additional surgical resection in high-risk cases. Current guideline-based risk stratification depends on pathological evaluation of the resected specimens to determine whether further surgery is needed. Yet both T1 CRC and EGC face shared challenges in LNM risk prediction, particularly in terms of accuracy and reproducibility. This review focuses on the latter. The diagnosis of key pathological risk factors, which serve as predictors of LNM, is subject to considerable interobserver variability among pathologists. One potential solution is the application of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted whole slide image (WSI) analysis, which has been gaining attention in recent studies. AI-assisted models for LNM prediction in T1 CRC and EGC have shown encouraging results, suggesting that WSI-based AI could offer a pathologist-independent strategy to improve diagnostic consistency. However, the field remains in an early stage, with key limitations including small sample sizes and limited external validation. Additional high-quality evidence will be needed to support clinical implementation. Addressing challenges such as stain standardization and image artifacts will also be critical for achieving regulatory approval and broader clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":72813,"journal":{"name":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Whole Slide Image Analysis for Lymph Node Status Prediction in Early Colorectal and Gastric Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Katsuro Ichimasa, Shin-Ei Kudo, Yuta Kouyama, Yuki Takashina, Hyunsoo Chung, Yasuharu Maeda, Wai Phyo Lwin, Yosuke Toya, Waku Hatta, Jimmy Bok Yan So, Khay Guan Yeoh, Tetsuo Nemoto, Masashi Misawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/den.70042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the widespread use of advanced endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, an increasing number of early colorectal cancer (T1 CRC) and early gastric cancer (EGC) cases are now treated with endoscopic resection as the first-line approach. However, the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM)-approximately 10% in T1 CRC and 5%-10% in EGC-necessitates additional surgical resection in high-risk cases. Current guideline-based risk stratification depends on pathological evaluation of the resected specimens to determine whether further surgery is needed. Yet both T1 CRC and EGC face shared challenges in LNM risk prediction, particularly in terms of accuracy and reproducibility. This review focuses on the latter. The diagnosis of key pathological risk factors, which serve as predictors of LNM, is subject to considerable interobserver variability among pathologists. One potential solution is the application of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted whole slide image (WSI) analysis, which has been gaining attention in recent studies. AI-assisted models for LNM prediction in T1 CRC and EGC have shown encouraging results, suggesting that WSI-based AI could offer a pathologist-independent strategy to improve diagnostic consistency. However, the field remains in an early stage, with key limitations including small sample sizes and limited external validation. Additional high-quality evidence will be needed to support clinical implementation. Addressing challenges such as stain standardization and image artifacts will also be critical for achieving regulatory approval and broader clinical adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.70042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.70042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着内镜粘膜下剥离等先进内镜技术的广泛应用,越来越多的早期结直肠癌(T1 CRC)和早期胃癌(EGC)患者将内镜切除作为一线治疗方法。然而,淋巴结转移(LNM)的风险- T1 CRC约为10%,egc为5%-10% -需要在高危病例中进行额外的手术切除。目前基于指南的风险分层取决于切除标本的病理评估,以确定是否需要进一步手术。然而,T1 CRC和EGC在LNM风险预测方面都面临着共同的挑战,特别是在准确性和可重复性方面。本文的重点是后者。作为LNM预测因子的关键病理危险因素的诊断,在病理学家之间存在相当大的观察者差异。一种潜在的解决方案是人工智能(AI)辅助全幻灯片图像(WSI)分析的应用,这在最近的研究中得到了广泛的关注。人工智能辅助模型用于T1 CRC和EGC的LNM预测已经显示出令人鼓舞的结果,这表明基于wsi的人工智能可以提供一种独立于病理学家的策略来提高诊断的一致性。然而,该领域仍处于早期阶段,主要局限包括样本量小和有限的外部验证。需要更多的高质量证据来支持临床实施。解决诸如染色标准化和图像伪影等挑战对于获得监管批准和更广泛的临床应用也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Whole Slide Image Analysis for Lymph Node Status Prediction in Early Colorectal and Gastric Cancer.

With the widespread use of advanced endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, an increasing number of early colorectal cancer (T1 CRC) and early gastric cancer (EGC) cases are now treated with endoscopic resection as the first-line approach. However, the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM)-approximately 10% in T1 CRC and 5%-10% in EGC-necessitates additional surgical resection in high-risk cases. Current guideline-based risk stratification depends on pathological evaluation of the resected specimens to determine whether further surgery is needed. Yet both T1 CRC and EGC face shared challenges in LNM risk prediction, particularly in terms of accuracy and reproducibility. This review focuses on the latter. The diagnosis of key pathological risk factors, which serve as predictors of LNM, is subject to considerable interobserver variability among pathologists. One potential solution is the application of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted whole slide image (WSI) analysis, which has been gaining attention in recent studies. AI-assisted models for LNM prediction in T1 CRC and EGC have shown encouraging results, suggesting that WSI-based AI could offer a pathologist-independent strategy to improve diagnostic consistency. However, the field remains in an early stage, with key limitations including small sample sizes and limited external validation. Additional high-quality evidence will be needed to support clinical implementation. Addressing challenges such as stain standardization and image artifacts will also be critical for achieving regulatory approval and broader clinical adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信