{"title":"“使用计算机辅助程序治疗失范症的好处。错误类型的改变在命名和概括方面的改进”。","authors":"Mercedes González-Sánchez, Cristina Vereda Alonso","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2025.2552969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Recent research has shown the effectiveness of computerized therapy in the treatment of anomia in patients with aphasia. Multisensory stimulation, the use of various types of aids for lexical access, and immediate feedback favor this type of therapy. In the present study, the Computer-assisted Anomia Rehabilitation Program (CARP2) was applied.<b>Aims:</b> This study was designed to verify the efficacy of CARP2 in naming, to analyze the changes in terms of correct responses and types of errors according to the type of anomia, and to verify whether changes were generalized to the processes and skills involved in naming.<b>Methods & Procedures:</b> Ten people with aphasia were treated for 25 weeks; four had lexical anomia, two phonological anomia, and four semantic anomia. Neuropsychological assessment was conducted pre- and post-treatment.<b>Outcomes & Results:</b> The patients increased their effectiveness in naming, reducing, or modifying the type of error. Generalization effect of benefits is predominant.<b>Conclusions:</b> The study's findings suggest the potential efficacy of the CARP2 program. This therapy might be beneficial across anomia types, although generalization of treatment gains appears somewhat restricted in the case of semantic anomia.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Benefits of using a computer-aided program for anomia. Changes in the type of errors in naming and generalization of improvements\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Mercedes González-Sánchez, Cristina Vereda Alonso\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09602011.2025.2552969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Recent research has shown the effectiveness of computerized therapy in the treatment of anomia in patients with aphasia. Multisensory stimulation, the use of various types of aids for lexical access, and immediate feedback favor this type of therapy. In the present study, the Computer-assisted Anomia Rehabilitation Program (CARP2) was applied.<b>Aims:</b> This study was designed to verify the efficacy of CARP2 in naming, to analyze the changes in terms of correct responses and types of errors according to the type of anomia, and to verify whether changes were generalized to the processes and skills involved in naming.<b>Methods & Procedures:</b> Ten people with aphasia were treated for 25 weeks; four had lexical anomia, two phonological anomia, and four semantic anomia. Neuropsychological assessment was conducted pre- and post-treatment.<b>Outcomes & Results:</b> The patients increased their effectiveness in naming, reducing, or modifying the type of error. Generalization effect of benefits is predominant.<b>Conclusions:</b> The study's findings suggest the potential efficacy of the CARP2 program. This therapy might be beneficial across anomia types, although generalization of treatment gains appears somewhat restricted in the case of semantic anomia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2552969\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2552969","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
"Benefits of using a computer-aided program for anomia. Changes in the type of errors in naming and generalization of improvements".
Background: Recent research has shown the effectiveness of computerized therapy in the treatment of anomia in patients with aphasia. Multisensory stimulation, the use of various types of aids for lexical access, and immediate feedback favor this type of therapy. In the present study, the Computer-assisted Anomia Rehabilitation Program (CARP2) was applied.Aims: This study was designed to verify the efficacy of CARP2 in naming, to analyze the changes in terms of correct responses and types of errors according to the type of anomia, and to verify whether changes were generalized to the processes and skills involved in naming.Methods & Procedures: Ten people with aphasia were treated for 25 weeks; four had lexical anomia, two phonological anomia, and four semantic anomia. Neuropsychological assessment was conducted pre- and post-treatment.Outcomes & Results: The patients increased their effectiveness in naming, reducing, or modifying the type of error. Generalization effect of benefits is predominant.Conclusions: The study's findings suggest the potential efficacy of the CARP2 program. This therapy might be beneficial across anomia types, although generalization of treatment gains appears somewhat restricted in the case of semantic anomia.
期刊介绍:
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.