超声滑动征在预测重复剖宫产腹内粘连诊断中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Keerthana Sugananthan, R Sajeetha Kumari, Sundara Raja Perumal, Anuradha Murugesan
{"title":"超声滑动征在预测重复剖宫产腹内粘连诊断中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Keerthana Sugananthan, R Sajeetha Kumari, Sundara Raja Perumal, Anuradha Murugesan","doi":"10.1007/s40477-025-01078-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intra-abdominal adhesions following caesarean sections pose significant challenges during repeat surgeries, leading to increased maternal morbidity. A reliable, non-invasive preoperative diagnostic tool such as the ultrasound (USG) sliding sign may help predict adhesions and improve surgical preparedness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound sliding sign in predicting intra-abdominal adhesions in women undergoing repeat lower segment caesarean section (LSCS), and to correlate sonographic findings with intraoperative adhesion severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted on 250 pregnant women with a history of one or more previous LSCS. All participants underwent preoperative transabdominal ultrasound to assess the presence or absence of the sliding sign. Adhesion severity was classified intraoperatively using the Nair classification. Associations between adhesion severity and clinical variables such as age, BMI, number of previous LSCS, and gestational age were analysed using chi-square and ANOVA tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant association was observed between the absence of the USG sliding sign and the presence of moderate to severe adhesions (p < 0.001). The sliding sign demonstrated a sensitivity of 72.88%, specificity of 85.86%, positive predictive value of 61.43%, and negative predictive value of 91.11% and an overall accuracy of 82.8%. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96, indicating excellent diagnostic accuracy. Mean intraoperative blood loss and time from skin incision to delivery significantly increased with higher adhesion grades (p < 0.001). A statistically significant correlation was also noted between the number of previous LSCS and adhesion severity (p = 0.022), whereas age, BMI, gestational age, and place of previous delivery were not significantly associated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ultrasound sliding sign is a simple, non-invasive, and effective tool for the preoperative prediction of intra-abdominal adhesions in women undergoing repeat caesarean sections. Its use may aid in surgical planning and reduce operative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":51528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic utility of the ultrasound sliding sign in predicting intra-abdominal adhesions in repeat caesarean delivery: a prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Keerthana Sugananthan, R Sajeetha Kumari, Sundara Raja Perumal, Anuradha Murugesan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40477-025-01078-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intra-abdominal adhesions following caesarean sections pose significant challenges during repeat surgeries, leading to increased maternal morbidity. A reliable, non-invasive preoperative diagnostic tool such as the ultrasound (USG) sliding sign may help predict adhesions and improve surgical preparedness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound sliding sign in predicting intra-abdominal adhesions in women undergoing repeat lower segment caesarean section (LSCS), and to correlate sonographic findings with intraoperative adhesion severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted on 250 pregnant women with a history of one or more previous LSCS. All participants underwent preoperative transabdominal ultrasound to assess the presence or absence of the sliding sign. Adhesion severity was classified intraoperatively using the Nair classification. Associations between adhesion severity and clinical variables such as age, BMI, number of previous LSCS, and gestational age were analysed using chi-square and ANOVA tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant association was observed between the absence of the USG sliding sign and the presence of moderate to severe adhesions (p < 0.001). The sliding sign demonstrated a sensitivity of 72.88%, specificity of 85.86%, positive predictive value of 61.43%, and negative predictive value of 91.11% and an overall accuracy of 82.8%. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96, indicating excellent diagnostic accuracy. Mean intraoperative blood loss and time from skin incision to delivery significantly increased with higher adhesion grades (p < 0.001). A statistically significant correlation was also noted between the number of previous LSCS and adhesion severity (p = 0.022), whereas age, BMI, gestational age, and place of previous delivery were not significantly associated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ultrasound sliding sign is a simple, non-invasive, and effective tool for the preoperative prediction of intra-abdominal adhesions in women undergoing repeat caesarean sections. Its use may aid in surgical planning and reduce operative complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-025-01078-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-025-01078-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:剖宫产术后腹腔粘连在重复手术中构成重大挑战,导致产妇发病率增加。一种可靠的、无创的术前诊断工具,如超声(USG)滑动征可能有助于预测粘连并改善手术准备。目的:评价超声滑动征象对重复下段剖宫产术(LSCS)患者腹内粘连的诊断准确性,并探讨超声表现与术中粘连严重程度的相关性。方法:这项前瞻性观察研究对250名有一个或多个LSCS病史的孕妇进行了研究。所有参与者术前都进行了经腹超声检查,以评估滑动征的存在与否。术中采用Nair分级法对粘连严重程度进行分级。粘连严重程度与临床变量(如年龄、BMI、既往LSCS数量和胎龄)之间的关系采用卡方和方差分析检验进行分析。结果:USG滑动征象的缺失与中度至重度粘连的存在之间存在显著的相关性(p结论:超声滑动征象是一种简单、无创、有效的工具,可用于反复剖宫产妇女术前预测腹内粘连。它的使用有助于手术计划和减少手术并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic utility of the ultrasound sliding sign in predicting intra-abdominal adhesions in repeat caesarean delivery: a prospective study.

Background: Intra-abdominal adhesions following caesarean sections pose significant challenges during repeat surgeries, leading to increased maternal morbidity. A reliable, non-invasive preoperative diagnostic tool such as the ultrasound (USG) sliding sign may help predict adhesions and improve surgical preparedness.

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound sliding sign in predicting intra-abdominal adhesions in women undergoing repeat lower segment caesarean section (LSCS), and to correlate sonographic findings with intraoperative adhesion severity.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on 250 pregnant women with a history of one or more previous LSCS. All participants underwent preoperative transabdominal ultrasound to assess the presence or absence of the sliding sign. Adhesion severity was classified intraoperatively using the Nair classification. Associations between adhesion severity and clinical variables such as age, BMI, number of previous LSCS, and gestational age were analysed using chi-square and ANOVA tests.

Results: A significant association was observed between the absence of the USG sliding sign and the presence of moderate to severe adhesions (p < 0.001). The sliding sign demonstrated a sensitivity of 72.88%, specificity of 85.86%, positive predictive value of 61.43%, and negative predictive value of 91.11% and an overall accuracy of 82.8%. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96, indicating excellent diagnostic accuracy. Mean intraoperative blood loss and time from skin incision to delivery significantly increased with higher adhesion grades (p < 0.001). A statistically significant correlation was also noted between the number of previous LSCS and adhesion severity (p = 0.022), whereas age, BMI, gestational age, and place of previous delivery were not significantly associated.

Conclusion: The ultrasound sliding sign is a simple, non-invasive, and effective tool for the preoperative prediction of intra-abdominal adhesions in women undergoing repeat caesarean sections. Its use may aid in surgical planning and reduce operative complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasound
Journal of Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound is the official journal of the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). The journal publishes original contributions (research and review articles, case reports, technical reports and letters to the editor) on significant advances in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and in cross-sectional diagnostic imaging. The official language of Journal of Ultrasound is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信