肝融合成像中基于图像的自动配准算子可变性及技术精度评价。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Masashi Hirooka, Teruki Miyake, Ryo Yano, Yoshiko Nakamura, Yuki Okazaki, Toyoki Shimamoto, Takao Watanabe, Osamu Yoshida, Yoshio Tokumoto, Masanori Abe, Yoichi Hiasa
{"title":"肝融合成像中基于图像的自动配准算子可变性及技术精度评价。","authors":"Masashi Hirooka, Teruki Miyake, Ryo Yano, Yoshiko Nakamura, Yuki Okazaki, Toyoki Shimamoto, Takao Watanabe, Osamu Yoshida, Yoshio Tokumoto, Masanori Abe, Yoichi Hiasa","doi":"10.1007/s10396-025-01579-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the technical feasibility and performance of automatic image-based registration (IBR) for liver fusion imaging and to identify clinical and anatomical factors affecting registration success.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study included 84 patients undergoing liver fusion imaging using an ultrasound system with IBR. Three operators with 5, 10, and 25 years of experience (junior, intermediate, and senior), respectively, independently performed IBR. Fusion time and registration error were recorded. Fusion success was defined both globally (success by all or at least one operator) and individually (registration error < 10 mm). Clinical and anatomical factors were assessed. Predictors of failure were identified using multivariable logistic regression with Firth's correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IBR was successful in all three operators in 86.9% of cases and by at least one operator in 96.4%. The most experienced operator achieved significantly shorter fusion times (median: 15.0 s) and smaller fusion errors (median: 6.0 mm) compared to the less experienced operators. Operator-specific success rates defined as registration error < 10 mm were 45.2%, 60.7%, and 79.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). Subcutaneous tissue depth was the only independent predictor of fusion failure in both multivariable models (OR = 1.13 for all failed, p = 0.033; OR = 0.88 for partial success, p = 0.012). Other clinical factors were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IBR is a highly feasible method that reduces operator dependency in liver fusion imaging compared to conventional methods, though registration accuracy still varies with operator experience.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>IBR enables consistent and simplified fusion imaging regardless of operator experience. Its broad applicability may support safer and more efficient ultrasound-guided interventions, especially in resource-limited or time-sensitive settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of operator variability and technical accuracy of automatic image-based registration in liver fusion imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Masashi Hirooka, Teruki Miyake, Ryo Yano, Yoshiko Nakamura, Yuki Okazaki, Toyoki Shimamoto, Takao Watanabe, Osamu Yoshida, Yoshio Tokumoto, Masanori Abe, Yoichi Hiasa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10396-025-01579-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the technical feasibility and performance of automatic image-based registration (IBR) for liver fusion imaging and to identify clinical and anatomical factors affecting registration success.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study included 84 patients undergoing liver fusion imaging using an ultrasound system with IBR. Three operators with 5, 10, and 25 years of experience (junior, intermediate, and senior), respectively, independently performed IBR. Fusion time and registration error were recorded. Fusion success was defined both globally (success by all or at least one operator) and individually (registration error < 10 mm). Clinical and anatomical factors were assessed. Predictors of failure were identified using multivariable logistic regression with Firth's correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IBR was successful in all three operators in 86.9% of cases and by at least one operator in 96.4%. The most experienced operator achieved significantly shorter fusion times (median: 15.0 s) and smaller fusion errors (median: 6.0 mm) compared to the less experienced operators. Operator-specific success rates defined as registration error < 10 mm were 45.2%, 60.7%, and 79.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). Subcutaneous tissue depth was the only independent predictor of fusion failure in both multivariable models (OR = 1.13 for all failed, p = 0.033; OR = 0.88 for partial success, p = 0.012). Other clinical factors were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IBR is a highly feasible method that reduces operator dependency in liver fusion imaging compared to conventional methods, though registration accuracy still varies with operator experience.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>IBR enables consistent and simplified fusion imaging regardless of operator experience. Its broad applicability may support safer and more efficient ultrasound-guided interventions, especially in resource-limited or time-sensitive settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-025-01579-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-025-01579-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价基于图像的自动配准(IBR)用于肝脏融合成像的技术可行性和性能,探讨影响配准成功的临床和解剖学因素。材料和方法:这项前瞻性研究包括84例使用IBR超声系统进行肝融合成像的患者。三名分别具有5年、10年和25年经验的操作员(初级、中级和高级)独立执行IBR。记录融合时间和配准误差。融合成功被定义为整体(所有或至少一个操作人员成功)和单独(注册错误)。结果:86.9%的病例中,所有三个操作人员都成功,96.4%的病例中,至少一个操作人员成功。与经验不足的术者相比,最有经验的术者实现了更短的融合时间(中位数:15.0 s)和更小的融合误差(中位数:6.0 mm)。结论:与传统方法相比,IBR是一种高度可行的方法,减少了对肝融合成像操作员的依赖,尽管配准精度仍因操作员经验而异。临床影响:无论操作人员经验如何,IBR都能实现一致和简化的融合成像。其广泛的适用性可以支持更安全、更有效的超声引导干预,特别是在资源有限或时间敏感的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of operator variability and technical accuracy of automatic image-based registration in liver fusion imaging.

Purpose: To evaluate the technical feasibility and performance of automatic image-based registration (IBR) for liver fusion imaging and to identify clinical and anatomical factors affecting registration success.

Materials and methods: This prospective study included 84 patients undergoing liver fusion imaging using an ultrasound system with IBR. Three operators with 5, 10, and 25 years of experience (junior, intermediate, and senior), respectively, independently performed IBR. Fusion time and registration error were recorded. Fusion success was defined both globally (success by all or at least one operator) and individually (registration error < 10 mm). Clinical and anatomical factors were assessed. Predictors of failure were identified using multivariable logistic regression with Firth's correction.

Results: IBR was successful in all three operators in 86.9% of cases and by at least one operator in 96.4%. The most experienced operator achieved significantly shorter fusion times (median: 15.0 s) and smaller fusion errors (median: 6.0 mm) compared to the less experienced operators. Operator-specific success rates defined as registration error < 10 mm were 45.2%, 60.7%, and 79.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). Subcutaneous tissue depth was the only independent predictor of fusion failure in both multivariable models (OR = 1.13 for all failed, p = 0.033; OR = 0.88 for partial success, p = 0.012). Other clinical factors were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: IBR is a highly feasible method that reduces operator dependency in liver fusion imaging compared to conventional methods, though registration accuracy still varies with operator experience.

Clinical impact: IBR enables consistent and simplified fusion imaging regardless of operator experience. Its broad applicability may support safer and more efficient ultrasound-guided interventions, especially in resource-limited or time-sensitive settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Ultrasonics is the official journal of the Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine. The main purpose of the journal is to provide forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the entire field of ultrasound in medicine and biology, encompassing both the medical and the engineering aspects of the science.The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, images, and letters to the editor.The journal also provides state-of-the-art information such as announcements from the boards and the committees of the society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信