SARS-CoV-2共感染对地方性HCoV-OC43重组驱动进化的中性影响

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY
Viruses-Basel Pub Date : 2025-09-18 DOI:10.3390/v17091263
Xueling Zheng, Yinyan Zhou, Yue Yu, Shi Cheng, Feifei Cao, Zhou Sun, Jun Li, Xinfen Yu
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2共感染对地方性HCoV-OC43重组驱动进化的中性影响","authors":"Xueling Zheng, Yinyan Zhou, Yue Yu, Shi Cheng, Feifei Cao, Zhou Sun, Jun Li, Xinfen Yu","doi":"10.3390/v17091263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Knowledge gaps exist on whether SARS-CoV-2 co-infection alters recombination frequency or induces phylogenetic incongruities in endemic β-coronaviruses (HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1), limiting our understanding of cross-species evolution. Among 7213 COVID-19 and 1590 non-COVID-19 acute respiratory cases (2021-2022) screened via multiplex PCR, β-coronavirus co-infections (SARS-CoV-2 + HCoV-OC43/HKU1) and single HCoV-OC43/HKU1 infections were identified. Whole-genome sequencing (Illumina NovaSeq) was performed. Phylogenies were reconstructed using Bayesian inference (MrBayes). Recombination was assessed via Bootscan analysis (SimPlot). Co-infection prevalence was low (0.51%, mainly HCoV-HKU1: 0.28%, HCoV-OC43: 0.11%). HCoV-OC43 diverged into lineage 1 (genotype K) and a novel recombinant lineage 2 (genotypes F/J/G/I segments), exhibiting accelerated evolution. HCoV-HKU1 remained genetically stable (genotype B). Co-infection status did not influence evolutionary outcomes. While SARS-CoV-2 co-infection may favor transmission of endemic HCoVs, their evolution appears driven by population-level selection, not co-infection. HCoV-OC43 underwent recombination-driven diversification, contrasting sharply with HCoV-HKU1's stasis, highlighting distinct evolutionary strategies. Integrated genomic and clinical surveillance is critical for tracking coronavirus adaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49328,"journal":{"name":"Viruses-Basel","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neutral Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Coinfection on the Recombination-Driven Evolution of Endemic HCoV-OC43.\",\"authors\":\"Xueling Zheng, Yinyan Zhou, Yue Yu, Shi Cheng, Feifei Cao, Zhou Sun, Jun Li, Xinfen Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/v17091263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Knowledge gaps exist on whether SARS-CoV-2 co-infection alters recombination frequency or induces phylogenetic incongruities in endemic β-coronaviruses (HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1), limiting our understanding of cross-species evolution. Among 7213 COVID-19 and 1590 non-COVID-19 acute respiratory cases (2021-2022) screened via multiplex PCR, β-coronavirus co-infections (SARS-CoV-2 + HCoV-OC43/HKU1) and single HCoV-OC43/HKU1 infections were identified. Whole-genome sequencing (Illumina NovaSeq) was performed. Phylogenies were reconstructed using Bayesian inference (MrBayes). Recombination was assessed via Bootscan analysis (SimPlot). Co-infection prevalence was low (0.51%, mainly HCoV-HKU1: 0.28%, HCoV-OC43: 0.11%). HCoV-OC43 diverged into lineage 1 (genotype K) and a novel recombinant lineage 2 (genotypes F/J/G/I segments), exhibiting accelerated evolution. HCoV-HKU1 remained genetically stable (genotype B). Co-infection status did not influence evolutionary outcomes. While SARS-CoV-2 co-infection may favor transmission of endemic HCoVs, their evolution appears driven by population-level selection, not co-infection. HCoV-OC43 underwent recombination-driven diversification, contrasting sharply with HCoV-HKU1's stasis, highlighting distinct evolutionary strategies. Integrated genomic and clinical surveillance is critical for tracking coronavirus adaptation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Viruses-Basel\",\"volume\":\"17 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474069/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Viruses-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/v17091263\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Viruses-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/v17091263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于SARS-CoV-2共感染是否会改变流行β-冠状病毒(HCoV-OC43、HCoV-HKU1)的重组频率或诱导系统发育不一致,存在知识空白,限制了我们对跨物种进化的理解。多重PCR筛查的7213例COVID-19和1590例非COVID-19急性呼吸道病例(2021-2022)中,发现β-冠状病毒共感染(SARS-CoV-2 + HCoV-OC43/HKU1)和HCoV-OC43/HKU1单感染。进行全基因组测序(Illumina NovaSeq)。采用贝叶斯推理(MrBayes)重建系统发育。通过Bootscan分析(SimPlot)评估重组情况。合并感染患病率较低(0.51%,主要为HCoV-HKU1: 0.28%, HCoV-OC43: 0.11%)。HCoV-OC43分化为谱系1(基因型K)和新的重组谱系2(基因型F/J/G/I片段),表现出加速进化。HCoV-HKU1基因保持稳定(基因型B)。合并感染状态不影响进化结果。虽然SARS-CoV-2合并感染可能有利于地方性hcov的传播,但它们的进化似乎是由种群水平的选择驱动的,而不是由合并感染驱动的。HCoV-OC43经历了重组驱动的多样化,与HCoV-HKU1的停滞形成鲜明对比,突出了不同的进化策略。基因组和临床综合监测对于跟踪冠状病毒适应至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Neutral Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Coinfection on the Recombination-Driven Evolution of Endemic HCoV-OC43.

Neutral Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Coinfection on the Recombination-Driven Evolution of Endemic HCoV-OC43.

Neutral Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Coinfection on the Recombination-Driven Evolution of Endemic HCoV-OC43.

Knowledge gaps exist on whether SARS-CoV-2 co-infection alters recombination frequency or induces phylogenetic incongruities in endemic β-coronaviruses (HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1), limiting our understanding of cross-species evolution. Among 7213 COVID-19 and 1590 non-COVID-19 acute respiratory cases (2021-2022) screened via multiplex PCR, β-coronavirus co-infections (SARS-CoV-2 + HCoV-OC43/HKU1) and single HCoV-OC43/HKU1 infections were identified. Whole-genome sequencing (Illumina NovaSeq) was performed. Phylogenies were reconstructed using Bayesian inference (MrBayes). Recombination was assessed via Bootscan analysis (SimPlot). Co-infection prevalence was low (0.51%, mainly HCoV-HKU1: 0.28%, HCoV-OC43: 0.11%). HCoV-OC43 diverged into lineage 1 (genotype K) and a novel recombinant lineage 2 (genotypes F/J/G/I segments), exhibiting accelerated evolution. HCoV-HKU1 remained genetically stable (genotype B). Co-infection status did not influence evolutionary outcomes. While SARS-CoV-2 co-infection may favor transmission of endemic HCoVs, their evolution appears driven by population-level selection, not co-infection. HCoV-OC43 underwent recombination-driven diversification, contrasting sharply with HCoV-HKU1's stasis, highlighting distinct evolutionary strategies. Integrated genomic and clinical surveillance is critical for tracking coronavirus adaptation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Viruses-Basel
Viruses-Basel VIROLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Viruses (ISSN 1999-4915) is an open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies of viruses. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications, conference reports and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. We also encourage the publication of timely reviews and commentaries on topics of interest to the virology community and feature highlights from the virology literature in the ''News and Views'' section. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信