正颌矢状面劈开截骨术中混合刚性内固定方法的术后稳定性:一项系统综述。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Sandro Bornelli Moreira, Mariana Aparecida Brozoski, Ricardo Grillo, Daniel Falbo Martins de Souza, Alexandre Meireles Borba, Maria da Graça Naclério-Homem
{"title":"正颌矢状面劈开截骨术中混合刚性内固定方法的术后稳定性:一项系统综述。","authors":"Sandro Bornelli Moreira, Mariana Aparecida Brozoski, Ricardo Grillo, Daniel Falbo Martins de Souza, Alexandre Meireles Borba, Maria da Graça Naclério-Homem","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) is a cornerstone of orthognathic surgery, yet the optimal fixation method for ensuring long-term stability remains debated, with hybrid fixation (combining monocortical plates and bicortical screws) emerging as a promising technique that balances rigidity and safety.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This systematic review attempted to assess whether the hybrid fixation system for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in orthognathic surgery provides adequate long-term stability by summarizing the results of clinical studies. This systematic review was prepared according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42022331540. Evidence searches were performed by two independent investigators in MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane databases, gray literature, and manual search to verify if patients who have undergone orthognathic surgery with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy fixed with the hybrid system, achieve satisfactory mandibular long-term stability, regardless of comparisons between other fixation systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All studies included in this review attributed the long-term stability to the hybrid fixation system of the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Our findings indicate a positive relationship between long-term stability and hybrid fixation when accessing mandibular asymmetries. Methodological differences were found in the included studies, particularly in relation to the assessment of surgical outcomes, as well as a small number of participants studied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current evidence for hybrid fixation is too limited and biased to confirm superiority, highlighting an urgent need for robust, prospective trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative stability of the hybrid method of rigid internal fixation in Sagittal Split Osteotomy for orthognathic surgery: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Sandro Bornelli Moreira, Mariana Aparecida Brozoski, Ricardo Grillo, Daniel Falbo Martins de Souza, Alexandre Meireles Borba, Maria da Graça Naclério-Homem\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) is a cornerstone of orthognathic surgery, yet the optimal fixation method for ensuring long-term stability remains debated, with hybrid fixation (combining monocortical plates and bicortical screws) emerging as a promising technique that balances rigidity and safety.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This systematic review attempted to assess whether the hybrid fixation system for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in orthognathic surgery provides adequate long-term stability by summarizing the results of clinical studies. This systematic review was prepared according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42022331540. Evidence searches were performed by two independent investigators in MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane databases, gray literature, and manual search to verify if patients who have undergone orthognathic surgery with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy fixed with the hybrid system, achieve satisfactory mandibular long-term stability, regardless of comparisons between other fixation systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All studies included in this review attributed the long-term stability to the hybrid fixation system of the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Our findings indicate a positive relationship between long-term stability and hybrid fixation when accessing mandibular asymmetries. Methodological differences were found in the included studies, particularly in relation to the assessment of surgical outcomes, as well as a small number of participants studied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current evidence for hybrid fixation is too limited and biased to confirm superiority, highlighting an urgent need for robust, prospective trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102577\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:双侧矢状分叉支截骨术(BSSO)是正颌手术的基石,但确保长期稳定性的最佳固定方法仍存在争议,混合固定(结合单皮质钢板和双皮质螺钉)是一种平衡刚性和安全性的有前途的技术。材料和方法:本系统综述试图通过总结临床研究结果来评估正颌手术中双侧矢状面劈裂截骨混合固定系统是否具有足够的长期稳定性。本系统综述是根据PRISMA指南编写的,并在PROSPERO注册,编号为CRD42022331540。两名独立调查人员在MEDLINE/PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、LILACS、Scopus、Cochrane数据库、灰色文献和人工检索中进行证据检索,以验证接受正颌手术并使用混合系统固定双侧矢状劈开截骨的患者是否获得满意的下颌长期稳定性,而不考虑与其他固定系统的比较。结果:本综述纳入的所有研究均将长期稳定性归因于双侧矢状面劈裂截骨混合固定系统。我们的研究结果表明,在处理下颌不对称时,长期稳定性和混合固定之间存在正相关关系。在纳入的研究中发现了方法学上的差异,特别是在评估手术结果方面,以及少数参与者的研究。结论:目前混合固定的证据过于有限和偏颇,无法证实其优越性,迫切需要进行强有力的前瞻性试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postoperative stability of the hybrid method of rigid internal fixation in Sagittal Split Osteotomy for orthognathic surgery: A systematic review.

Objectives: Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) is a cornerstone of orthognathic surgery, yet the optimal fixation method for ensuring long-term stability remains debated, with hybrid fixation (combining monocortical plates and bicortical screws) emerging as a promising technique that balances rigidity and safety.

Material and methods: This systematic review attempted to assess whether the hybrid fixation system for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in orthognathic surgery provides adequate long-term stability by summarizing the results of clinical studies. This systematic review was prepared according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42022331540. Evidence searches were performed by two independent investigators in MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane databases, gray literature, and manual search to verify if patients who have undergone orthognathic surgery with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy fixed with the hybrid system, achieve satisfactory mandibular long-term stability, regardless of comparisons between other fixation systems.

Results: All studies included in this review attributed the long-term stability to the hybrid fixation system of the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Our findings indicate a positive relationship between long-term stability and hybrid fixation when accessing mandibular asymmetries. Methodological differences were found in the included studies, particularly in relation to the assessment of surgical outcomes, as well as a small number of participants studied.

Conclusion: The current evidence for hybrid fixation is too limited and biased to confirm superiority, highlighting an urgent need for robust, prospective trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
305
期刊介绍: J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics. Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must: Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise; Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research; Be solely the work of the author(s) stated; Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal; Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed. Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信