唾液PCR检测先天性巨细胞病毒的诊断性能:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY
Viruses-Basel Pub Date : 2025-09-17 DOI:10.3390/v17091253
Sara Mohammed Ahmed Rady, Mahmoud Ibrahim Abdelmoati, Sara Sabra, Maryam Alameddine, Suchita Dsilva, Jeevan K Shetty
{"title":"唾液PCR检测先天性巨细胞病毒的诊断性能:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Sara Mohammed Ahmed Rady, Mahmoud Ibrahim Abdelmoati, Sara Sabra, Maryam Alameddine, Suchita Dsilva, Jeevan K Shetty","doi":"10.3390/v17091253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of neonatal morbidity, particularly sensorineural hearing loss, yet its early detection remains challenging. While urinary PCR is the current diagnostic gold standard, its implementation in neonatal settings is often limited by feasibility issues. Salivary PCR presents a more practical alternative, but its diagnostic accuracy has remained uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of salivary PCR compared to urinary PCR in detecting congenital CMV in neonates. Following PRISMA guidelines, 15 observational studies involving 29,617 neonates were analyzed using a random-effects model. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.99 and 1.00, respectively, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 1.00 and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.91, despite moderate heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis showed high diagnostic performance across general neonates, infants of seropositive mothers and high-risk neonates (referring to neonates that are small for their gestational age (SGA), neonates who failed hearing screening, and neonates with CMV-related congenital abnormalities). The general group had the highest specificity (0.999), while high-risk neonates showed the highest sensitivity (0.981). Across all groups, NPV remained consistently above 0.994, with PPV ranging from 0.848 to 0.981. These findings confirm that salivary PCR is a highly accurate and feasible tool for congenital CMV diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":49328,"journal":{"name":"Viruses-Basel","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Performance of Salivary PCR for the Detection of Congenital Cytomegalovirus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Mohammed Ahmed Rady, Mahmoud Ibrahim Abdelmoati, Sara Sabra, Maryam Alameddine, Suchita Dsilva, Jeevan K Shetty\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/v17091253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of neonatal morbidity, particularly sensorineural hearing loss, yet its early detection remains challenging. While urinary PCR is the current diagnostic gold standard, its implementation in neonatal settings is often limited by feasibility issues. Salivary PCR presents a more practical alternative, but its diagnostic accuracy has remained uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of salivary PCR compared to urinary PCR in detecting congenital CMV in neonates. Following PRISMA guidelines, 15 observational studies involving 29,617 neonates were analyzed using a random-effects model. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.99 and 1.00, respectively, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 1.00 and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.91, despite moderate heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis showed high diagnostic performance across general neonates, infants of seropositive mothers and high-risk neonates (referring to neonates that are small for their gestational age (SGA), neonates who failed hearing screening, and neonates with CMV-related congenital abnormalities). The general group had the highest specificity (0.999), while high-risk neonates showed the highest sensitivity (0.981). Across all groups, NPV remained consistently above 0.994, with PPV ranging from 0.848 to 0.981. These findings confirm that salivary PCR is a highly accurate and feasible tool for congenital CMV diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Viruses-Basel\",\"volume\":\"17 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474390/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Viruses-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/v17091253\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Viruses-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/v17091253","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先天性巨细胞病毒(CMV)是新生儿发病的主要原因,尤其是感音神经性听力损失,但其早期检测仍然具有挑战性。虽然尿PCR是目前诊断的金标准,但其在新生儿环境中的实施往往受到可行性问题的限制。唾液PCR是一种更实用的替代方法,但其诊断准确性仍不确定。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评价唾液PCR与尿液PCR在检测新生儿先天性巨细胞病毒方面的性能。遵循PRISMA指南,使用随机效应模型分析了涉及29,617名新生儿的15项观察性研究。尽管存在中度异质性,但合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.99和1.00,阴性预测值(NPV)为1.00,阳性预测值(PPV)为0.91。亚组分析显示,在普通新生儿、血清阳性母亲的婴儿和高危新生儿(指胎龄较小的新生儿(SGA)、听力筛查失败的新生儿和巨细胞病毒相关先天性异常的新生儿)中,该方法的诊断效果都很高。普通组特异性最高(0.999),高危组敏感性最高(0.981)。在所有组中,NPV始终保持在0.994以上,PPV在0.848至0.981之间。这些发现证实了唾液PCR是一种高度准确和可行的先天性巨细胞病毒诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnostic Performance of Salivary PCR for the Detection of Congenital Cytomegalovirus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Diagnostic Performance of Salivary PCR for the Detection of Congenital Cytomegalovirus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Diagnostic Performance of Salivary PCR for the Detection of Congenital Cytomegalovirus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Diagnostic Performance of Salivary PCR for the Detection of Congenital Cytomegalovirus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of neonatal morbidity, particularly sensorineural hearing loss, yet its early detection remains challenging. While urinary PCR is the current diagnostic gold standard, its implementation in neonatal settings is often limited by feasibility issues. Salivary PCR presents a more practical alternative, but its diagnostic accuracy has remained uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of salivary PCR compared to urinary PCR in detecting congenital CMV in neonates. Following PRISMA guidelines, 15 observational studies involving 29,617 neonates were analyzed using a random-effects model. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.99 and 1.00, respectively, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 1.00 and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.91, despite moderate heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis showed high diagnostic performance across general neonates, infants of seropositive mothers and high-risk neonates (referring to neonates that are small for their gestational age (SGA), neonates who failed hearing screening, and neonates with CMV-related congenital abnormalities). The general group had the highest specificity (0.999), while high-risk neonates showed the highest sensitivity (0.981). Across all groups, NPV remained consistently above 0.994, with PPV ranging from 0.848 to 0.981. These findings confirm that salivary PCR is a highly accurate and feasible tool for congenital CMV diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Viruses-Basel
Viruses-Basel VIROLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Viruses (ISSN 1999-4915) is an open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies of viruses. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications, conference reports and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. We also encourage the publication of timely reviews and commentaries on topics of interest to the virology community and feature highlights from the virology literature in the ''News and Views'' section. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信