孤立和失业的双重负担:日本结构弱势群体的自杀风险——以秋田县为例(2018-2022)。

3区 综合性期刊
Roseline Yong
{"title":"孤立和失业的双重负担:日本结构弱势群体的自杀风险——以秋田县为例(2018-2022)。","authors":"Roseline Yong","doi":"10.3390/ijerph22091447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicide in Japan remains elevated and uneven across regions. We hypothesized that (H1) unemployment and (H2) living alone each increase suicide mortality, and that (H3) their combination yields more-than-additive risk, especially among middle-aged men. Using specially tabulated mortality data (2018-2022) from the Japan Suicide Countermeasures Promotion Center, we cross-classified deaths and denominators into 24 strata by sex, age (20-39, 40-59, ≥60), employment (employed/unemployed), and cohabitation (with others/alone). Five-year average rates per 100,000 were computed; between-group differences were tested with chi-square (Holm-adjusted contrasts). Additive interaction between unemployment and living alone was quantified with the Interaction Contrast (ICR) and Synergy Index (SI), and Akita rates were benchmarked against national strata. Prefecture-level quantification and national benchmarking are rarely reported in Japan. Rates differed significantly across employment-by-cohabitation groups in every sex-by-age stratum (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Unemployment and living alone each elevated risk, with the highest rate reported among unemployed men aged 40-59 who were living alone (317.1; >14× employed, cohabiting peers at 22.1). Additive interaction was strongest in men aged 40-59 (ICR = 198.3; SI = 3.05) and present in men aged 20-39 and ≥60; among women, interaction was most evident at the ages of 40-59 and sub-additive at ≥60. Compounded effects among men were consistently larger in Akita than nationally, whereas the largest absolute burden fell on unemployed men aged ≥60 who were living with others (203 deaths). The novelty of this investigation lies in quantifying additive interaction with national benchmarking and contrasting per capita risk with absolute burden to guide dual-track prevention. The findings are ecological.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"22 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Double Burden of Isolation and Unemployment: Suicide Risk in Structurally Vulnerable Populations in Japan-A Case Study of Akita Prefecture (2018-2022).\",\"authors\":\"Roseline Yong\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ijerph22091447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Suicide in Japan remains elevated and uneven across regions. We hypothesized that (H1) unemployment and (H2) living alone each increase suicide mortality, and that (H3) their combination yields more-than-additive risk, especially among middle-aged men. Using specially tabulated mortality data (2018-2022) from the Japan Suicide Countermeasures Promotion Center, we cross-classified deaths and denominators into 24 strata by sex, age (20-39, 40-59, ≥60), employment (employed/unemployed), and cohabitation (with others/alone). Five-year average rates per 100,000 were computed; between-group differences were tested with chi-square (Holm-adjusted contrasts). Additive interaction between unemployment and living alone was quantified with the Interaction Contrast (ICR) and Synergy Index (SI), and Akita rates were benchmarked against national strata. Prefecture-level quantification and national benchmarking are rarely reported in Japan. Rates differed significantly across employment-by-cohabitation groups in every sex-by-age stratum (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Unemployment and living alone each elevated risk, with the highest rate reported among unemployed men aged 40-59 who were living alone (317.1; >14× employed, cohabiting peers at 22.1). Additive interaction was strongest in men aged 40-59 (ICR = 198.3; SI = 3.05) and present in men aged 20-39 and ≥60; among women, interaction was most evident at the ages of 40-59 and sub-additive at ≥60. Compounded effects among men were consistently larger in Akita than nationally, whereas the largest absolute burden fell on unemployed men aged ≥60 who were living with others (203 deaths). The novelty of this investigation lies in quantifying additive interaction with national benchmarking and contrasting per capita risk with absolute burden to guide dual-track prevention. The findings are ecological.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"22 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469566/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091447\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

日本的自杀率居高不下,而且各地区之间也不均衡。我们假设(H1)失业和(H2)独居都增加了自杀死亡率,(H3)两者的结合产生了超过相加的风险,尤其是在中年男性中。使用日本自杀对策促进中心专门编制的死亡率数据(2018-2022年),我们将死亡和分母按性别、年龄(20-39岁、40-59岁、≥60岁)、就业(在职/失业)和同居(与他人/单独)交叉分类为24个阶层。计算了每10万人的五年平均费率;组间差异采用卡方(holm校正对比)检验。用相互作用对比(ICR)和协同指数(SI)量化了失业和独居之间的加性相互作用,并以秋田地区的失业率为基准。日本很少报道地级市的量化和国家基准。不同性别、年龄层的同居就业组的比率差异显著(p < 0.001)。失业和独居都增加了风险,在40-59岁的失业男性中,独居的风险最高(317.1;bb10; 14x),同居的同龄人为22.1。加性相互作用在40-59岁男性中最强(ICR = 198.3; SI = 3.05),在20-39岁和≥60岁男性中存在;在女性中,相互作用在40-59岁时最为明显,在≥60岁时呈次加性。秋田地区男性的复合影响始终大于全国,而最大的绝对负担落在60岁以上与他人同居的失业男性身上(203人死亡)。本研究的新颖之处在于量化与国家基准的加性相互作用,并将人均风险与绝对负担进行对比,以指导双轨预防。这些发现是生态方面的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Double Burden of Isolation and Unemployment: Suicide Risk in Structurally Vulnerable Populations in Japan-A Case Study of Akita Prefecture (2018-2022).

The Double Burden of Isolation and Unemployment: Suicide Risk in Structurally Vulnerable Populations in Japan-A Case Study of Akita Prefecture (2018-2022).

The Double Burden of Isolation and Unemployment: Suicide Risk in Structurally Vulnerable Populations in Japan-A Case Study of Akita Prefecture (2018-2022).

Suicide in Japan remains elevated and uneven across regions. We hypothesized that (H1) unemployment and (H2) living alone each increase suicide mortality, and that (H3) their combination yields more-than-additive risk, especially among middle-aged men. Using specially tabulated mortality data (2018-2022) from the Japan Suicide Countermeasures Promotion Center, we cross-classified deaths and denominators into 24 strata by sex, age (20-39, 40-59, ≥60), employment (employed/unemployed), and cohabitation (with others/alone). Five-year average rates per 100,000 were computed; between-group differences were tested with chi-square (Holm-adjusted contrasts). Additive interaction between unemployment and living alone was quantified with the Interaction Contrast (ICR) and Synergy Index (SI), and Akita rates were benchmarked against national strata. Prefecture-level quantification and national benchmarking are rarely reported in Japan. Rates differed significantly across employment-by-cohabitation groups in every sex-by-age stratum (p < 0.001). Unemployment and living alone each elevated risk, with the highest rate reported among unemployed men aged 40-59 who were living alone (317.1; >14× employed, cohabiting peers at 22.1). Additive interaction was strongest in men aged 40-59 (ICR = 198.3; SI = 3.05) and present in men aged 20-39 and ≥60; among women, interaction was most evident at the ages of 40-59 and sub-additive at ≥60. Compounded effects among men were consistently larger in Akita than nationally, whereas the largest absolute burden fell on unemployed men aged ≥60 who were living with others (203 deaths). The novelty of this investigation lies in quantifying additive interaction with national benchmarking and contrasting per capita risk with absolute burden to guide dual-track prevention. The findings are ecological.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信