{"title":"支架辅助线圈栓塞治疗颅内破裂动脉瘤后双重抗血小板治疗的安全性、有效性及不良临床预后的危险因素分析","authors":"Simin Wang, Tongyu Zhang, Jiewen Geng, Jingwei Li, Sishi Xiang, Peng Hu, Chuan He, Hongqi Zhang","doi":"10.1177/15910199251375526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following stent-assisted coil (SAC) embolization increases the risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of DAPT in treating acute ruptured aneurysms after SAC and analyze risk factors for poor clinical prognosis.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) between 1 May 2017 and 31 December 2021. Patients were divided into the SAC group and the non-SAC group (NSC). The SAC group received DAPT. We also compared modified Rankin Scale scores and the incidence of bleeding and ischemic complications. Additionally, we analyzed risk factors affecting clinical prognosis.ResultsA total of 2612 patients were included in the analysis: 1011 in the SAC group and 1601 in the NSC group. During hospitalization, there was no significant difference in bleeding and ischemic complications between the groups. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical prognosis between the SAC and NSC groups at discharge and six months after discharge. Multivariate analysis indicated age, previous cerebral hemorrhage, posterior circulation aneurysm, multiple aneurysms, modified Fisher scale 3-4, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 3-8 and 9-12 as risk factors for poor clinical prognosis after SAC.ConclusionsDAPT after SAC for intracranial ruptured aneurysms was found to be safe and effective. Age, previous cerebral hemorrhage, posterior circulation aneurysm, multiple aneurysms, modified Fisher scale 3-4, and GCS scores of 3-12 were identified as risk factors for poor prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251375526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of safety, efficacy, and risk factors for poor clinical prognosis of dual antiplatelet therapy after stent-assisted coil embolization for intracranial ruptured aneurysms.\",\"authors\":\"Simin Wang, Tongyu Zhang, Jiewen Geng, Jingwei Li, Sishi Xiang, Peng Hu, Chuan He, Hongqi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199251375526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundDual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following stent-assisted coil (SAC) embolization increases the risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of DAPT in treating acute ruptured aneurysms after SAC and analyze risk factors for poor clinical prognosis.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) between 1 May 2017 and 31 December 2021. Patients were divided into the SAC group and the non-SAC group (NSC). The SAC group received DAPT. We also compared modified Rankin Scale scores and the incidence of bleeding and ischemic complications. Additionally, we analyzed risk factors affecting clinical prognosis.ResultsA total of 2612 patients were included in the analysis: 1011 in the SAC group and 1601 in the NSC group. During hospitalization, there was no significant difference in bleeding and ischemic complications between the groups. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical prognosis between the SAC and NSC groups at discharge and six months after discharge. Multivariate analysis indicated age, previous cerebral hemorrhage, posterior circulation aneurysm, multiple aneurysms, modified Fisher scale 3-4, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 3-8 and 9-12 as risk factors for poor clinical prognosis after SAC.ConclusionsDAPT after SAC for intracranial ruptured aneurysms was found to be safe and effective. Age, previous cerebral hemorrhage, posterior circulation aneurysm, multiple aneurysms, modified Fisher scale 3-4, and GCS scores of 3-12 were identified as risk factors for poor prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199251375526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474573/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251375526\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251375526","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of safety, efficacy, and risk factors for poor clinical prognosis of dual antiplatelet therapy after stent-assisted coil embolization for intracranial ruptured aneurysms.
BackgroundDual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following stent-assisted coil (SAC) embolization increases the risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of DAPT in treating acute ruptured aneurysms after SAC and analyze risk factors for poor clinical prognosis.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) between 1 May 2017 and 31 December 2021. Patients were divided into the SAC group and the non-SAC group (NSC). The SAC group received DAPT. We also compared modified Rankin Scale scores and the incidence of bleeding and ischemic complications. Additionally, we analyzed risk factors affecting clinical prognosis.ResultsA total of 2612 patients were included in the analysis: 1011 in the SAC group and 1601 in the NSC group. During hospitalization, there was no significant difference in bleeding and ischemic complications between the groups. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical prognosis between the SAC and NSC groups at discharge and six months after discharge. Multivariate analysis indicated age, previous cerebral hemorrhage, posterior circulation aneurysm, multiple aneurysms, modified Fisher scale 3-4, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 3-8 and 9-12 as risk factors for poor clinical prognosis after SAC.ConclusionsDAPT after SAC for intracranial ruptured aneurysms was found to be safe and effective. Age, previous cerebral hemorrhage, posterior circulation aneurysm, multiple aneurysms, modified Fisher scale 3-4, and GCS scores of 3-12 were identified as risk factors for poor prognosis.
期刊介绍:
Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...