支架辅助线圈栓塞治疗颅内破裂动脉瘤后双重抗血小板治疗的安全性、有效性及不良临床预后的危险因素分析

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Simin Wang, Tongyu Zhang, Jiewen Geng, Jingwei Li, Sishi Xiang, Peng Hu, Chuan He, Hongqi Zhang
{"title":"支架辅助线圈栓塞治疗颅内破裂动脉瘤后双重抗血小板治疗的安全性、有效性及不良临床预后的危险因素分析","authors":"Simin Wang, Tongyu Zhang, Jiewen Geng, Jingwei Li, Sishi Xiang, Peng Hu, Chuan He, Hongqi Zhang","doi":"10.1177/15910199251375526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following stent-assisted coil (SAC) embolization increases the risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of DAPT in treating acute ruptured aneurysms after SAC and analyze risk factors for poor clinical prognosis.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) between 1 May 2017 and 31 December 2021. Patients were divided into the SAC group and the non-SAC group (NSC). The SAC group received DAPT. We also compared modified Rankin Scale scores and the incidence of bleeding and ischemic complications. Additionally, we analyzed risk factors affecting clinical prognosis.ResultsA total of 2612 patients were included in the analysis: 1011 in the SAC group and 1601 in the NSC group. During hospitalization, there was no significant difference in bleeding and ischemic complications between the groups. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical prognosis between the SAC and NSC groups at discharge and six months after discharge. Multivariate analysis indicated age, previous cerebral hemorrhage, posterior circulation aneurysm, multiple aneurysms, modified Fisher scale 3-4, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 3-8 and 9-12 as risk factors for poor clinical prognosis after SAC.ConclusionsDAPT after SAC for intracranial ruptured aneurysms was found to be safe and effective. Age, previous cerebral hemorrhage, posterior circulation aneurysm, multiple aneurysms, modified Fisher scale 3-4, and GCS scores of 3-12 were identified as risk factors for poor prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251375526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of safety, efficacy, and risk factors for poor clinical prognosis of dual antiplatelet therapy after stent-assisted coil embolization for intracranial ruptured aneurysms.\",\"authors\":\"Simin Wang, Tongyu Zhang, Jiewen Geng, Jingwei Li, Sishi Xiang, Peng Hu, Chuan He, Hongqi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199251375526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundDual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following stent-assisted coil (SAC) embolization increases the risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of DAPT in treating acute ruptured aneurysms after SAC and analyze risk factors for poor clinical prognosis.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) between 1 May 2017 and 31 December 2021. Patients were divided into the SAC group and the non-SAC group (NSC). The SAC group received DAPT. We also compared modified Rankin Scale scores and the incidence of bleeding and ischemic complications. Additionally, we analyzed risk factors affecting clinical prognosis.ResultsA total of 2612 patients were included in the analysis: 1011 in the SAC group and 1601 in the NSC group. During hospitalization, there was no significant difference in bleeding and ischemic complications between the groups. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical prognosis between the SAC and NSC groups at discharge and six months after discharge. Multivariate analysis indicated age, previous cerebral hemorrhage, posterior circulation aneurysm, multiple aneurysms, modified Fisher scale 3-4, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 3-8 and 9-12 as risk factors for poor clinical prognosis after SAC.ConclusionsDAPT after SAC for intracranial ruptured aneurysms was found to be safe and effective. Age, previous cerebral hemorrhage, posterior circulation aneurysm, multiple aneurysms, modified Fisher scale 3-4, and GCS scores of 3-12 were identified as risk factors for poor prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199251375526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474573/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251375526\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251375526","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

支架辅助线圈(SAC)栓塞后的双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)增加了缺血性和出血性并发症的风险。评价DAPT治疗SAC术后急性破裂动脉瘤的安全性和有效性,分析其临床预后不良的危险因素。方法回顾性分析2017年5月1日至2021年12月31日动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)患者的资料。将患者分为SAC组和非SAC组(NSC)。SAC组接受DAPT。我们还比较了改良兰金量表评分和出血及缺血性并发症的发生率。此外,我们还分析了影响临床预后的危险因素。结果共纳入2612例患者:SAC组1011例,NSC组1601例。住院期间,两组间出血及缺血性并发症发生率无显著差异。同样,SAC组和NSC组在出院时和出院后6个月的临床预后无统计学差异。多因素分析显示,年龄、既往脑出血、后循环动脉瘤、多发动脉瘤、改良Fisher评分3-4分、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS) 3-8分、9-12分是SAC术后临床预后不良的危险因素。结论SAC术后sdap治疗颅内破裂动脉瘤安全有效。年龄、既往脑出血、后循环动脉瘤、多发动脉瘤、改良Fisher评分3-4分、GCS评分3-12分为预后不良的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of safety, efficacy, and risk factors for poor clinical prognosis of dual antiplatelet therapy after stent-assisted coil embolization for intracranial ruptured aneurysms.

BackgroundDual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following stent-assisted coil (SAC) embolization increases the risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of DAPT in treating acute ruptured aneurysms after SAC and analyze risk factors for poor clinical prognosis.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) between 1 May 2017 and 31 December 2021. Patients were divided into the SAC group and the non-SAC group (NSC). The SAC group received DAPT. We also compared modified Rankin Scale scores and the incidence of bleeding and ischemic complications. Additionally, we analyzed risk factors affecting clinical prognosis.ResultsA total of 2612 patients were included in the analysis: 1011 in the SAC group and 1601 in the NSC group. During hospitalization, there was no significant difference in bleeding and ischemic complications between the groups. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical prognosis between the SAC and NSC groups at discharge and six months after discharge. Multivariate analysis indicated age, previous cerebral hemorrhage, posterior circulation aneurysm, multiple aneurysms, modified Fisher scale 3-4, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 3-8 and 9-12 as risk factors for poor clinical prognosis after SAC.ConclusionsDAPT after SAC for intracranial ruptured aneurysms was found to be safe and effective. Age, previous cerebral hemorrhage, posterior circulation aneurysm, multiple aneurysms, modified Fisher scale 3-4, and GCS scores of 3-12 were identified as risk factors for poor prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信