联合训练对肥胖患者内脏脂肪指数和代谢表型的影响:一项随机临床试验。

3区 综合性期刊
Júlia Elena Fontana Ronsani, Mariana Papini Gabiatti, Anne Ribeiro Streb, Rodrigo Sudatti Delevatti, Giovani Firpo Del Duca, Fernanda Hansen
{"title":"联合训练对肥胖患者内脏脂肪指数和代谢表型的影响:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Júlia Elena Fontana Ronsani, Mariana Papini Gabiatti, Anne Ribeiro Streb, Rodrigo Sudatti Delevatti, Giovani Firpo Del Duca, Fernanda Hansen","doi":"10.3390/ijerph22091462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: The role of obesity in developing metabolic alterations is related to the distribution of adipose tissue, and visceral fat predisposes people to a higher risk than subcutaneous fat. The effect of different forms of periodization of combined training is still unknown in reducing cardiometabolic risk in adults with obesity. This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effects of 16 weeks of periodized combined training with fixed and linear increase intensities on individuals with obesity, using the visceral adiposity index (VAI) and metabolic phenotype. <b>Methods</b>: In total, 59 adults with obesity (61.0% female) were allocated into three groups: control (CG, 34.4 ± 6.9 years; BMI, 33.0 ± 2.5 kg.m<sup>-2</sup>), combined training with fixed intensity (FG, 33.6 ± 8.4 years; BMI, 32.9 ± 2.3 kg.m<sup>-2</sup>), and linear increase intensity (LG, 34.5 ± 6.0 years; BMI, 33.4 ± 2.8 kg.m<sup>-2</sup>) in a 1:1:1 ratio. VAI equations were used with waist circumference, triglycerides, BMI, and HDL-c. The metabolic phenotype was defined by the presence of >3 abnormalities of the following: systolic/diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, HDL-c, fasting blood glucose, and waist circumference, classified as metabolically healthy and unhealthy (MHO; MUO). Intra- and intergroup analyses were performed per protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) using the Generalized Estimated Equations method. <i>p</i> < 0.10 was the level of significance adopted for interaction, and <i>p</i> < 0.05 was the level of significance for the isolated effect of time and/or group. <b>Results</b>: VAI decreased in FG (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in PP and ITT analyses, but not in LG in either analysis (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There was a higher number of MUO in FG compared to LG, only in PP, considering the effect of group analysis (<i>p</i> < 0.01), but not of time or group * time or ITT analyses (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: Combined training with fixed intensity improved VAI but was insufficient to affect metabolic phenotype. These findings suggest minimal differences between fixed intensity and linear increase protocols in reducing the risk of metabolic complications during obesity treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"22 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Combined Training on Visceral Adiposity Index and Metabolic Phenotype in Obesity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Júlia Elena Fontana Ronsani, Mariana Papini Gabiatti, Anne Ribeiro Streb, Rodrigo Sudatti Delevatti, Giovani Firpo Del Duca, Fernanda Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ijerph22091462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: The role of obesity in developing metabolic alterations is related to the distribution of adipose tissue, and visceral fat predisposes people to a higher risk than subcutaneous fat. The effect of different forms of periodization of combined training is still unknown in reducing cardiometabolic risk in adults with obesity. This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effects of 16 weeks of periodized combined training with fixed and linear increase intensities on individuals with obesity, using the visceral adiposity index (VAI) and metabolic phenotype. <b>Methods</b>: In total, 59 adults with obesity (61.0% female) were allocated into three groups: control (CG, 34.4 ± 6.9 years; BMI, 33.0 ± 2.5 kg.m<sup>-2</sup>), combined training with fixed intensity (FG, 33.6 ± 8.4 years; BMI, 32.9 ± 2.3 kg.m<sup>-2</sup>), and linear increase intensity (LG, 34.5 ± 6.0 years; BMI, 33.4 ± 2.8 kg.m<sup>-2</sup>) in a 1:1:1 ratio. VAI equations were used with waist circumference, triglycerides, BMI, and HDL-c. The metabolic phenotype was defined by the presence of >3 abnormalities of the following: systolic/diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, HDL-c, fasting blood glucose, and waist circumference, classified as metabolically healthy and unhealthy (MHO; MUO). Intra- and intergroup analyses were performed per protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) using the Generalized Estimated Equations method. <i>p</i> < 0.10 was the level of significance adopted for interaction, and <i>p</i> < 0.05 was the level of significance for the isolated effect of time and/or group. <b>Results</b>: VAI decreased in FG (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in PP and ITT analyses, but not in LG in either analysis (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There was a higher number of MUO in FG compared to LG, only in PP, considering the effect of group analysis (<i>p</i> < 0.01), but not of time or group * time or ITT analyses (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: Combined training with fixed intensity improved VAI but was insufficient to affect metabolic phenotype. These findings suggest minimal differences between fixed intensity and linear increase protocols in reducing the risk of metabolic complications during obesity treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"22 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469366/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091462\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:肥胖在代谢改变中的作用与脂肪组织的分布有关,内脏脂肪比皮下脂肪更容易使人发生代谢改变。不同形式的周期化联合训练在降低成人肥胖患者心脏代谢风险方面的作用尚不清楚。本随机临床试验旨在比较16周固定和线性增加强度的定期联合训练对肥胖个体的影响,使用内脏脂肪指数(VAI)和代谢表型。方法:59例肥胖成人(女性占61.0%)按1:1:1的比例分为对照组(CG, 34.4±6.9岁;BMI, 33.0±2.5 kg.m-2)、固定强度联合训练组(FG, 33.6±8.4岁;BMI, 32.9±2.3 kg.m-2)和线性增加强度组(LG, 34.5±6.0岁;BMI, 33.4±2.8 kg.m-2)。VAI方程与腰围、甘油三酯、BMI和HDL-c一起使用。代谢表型通过以下bbbb3异常的存在来定义:收缩压/舒张压、甘油三酯、HDL-c、空腹血糖和腰围,分为代谢健康和不健康(MHO; MUO)。使用广义估计方程方法对每个方案(PP)和意向治疗(ITT)进行组内和组间分析。P < 0.10为相互作用的显著性水平,P < 0.05为时间和/或组的孤立效应的显著性水平。结果:VAI在PP和ITT分析中降低FG (p < 0.001),但在两种分析中均未降低LG (p < 0.05)。考虑到组分析的影响(p < 0.01), FG组的MUO数量高于LG组,只有PP组的MUO数量高于LG组(p < 0.01),而时间、组*时间和ITT分析的MUO数量均不高于LG组(p < 0.05)。结论:固定强度联合训练可改善VAI,但不足以影响代谢表型。这些发现表明,在肥胖治疗期间,固定强度和线性增加方案在降低代谢并发症风险方面差异极小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of Combined Training on Visceral Adiposity Index and Metabolic Phenotype in Obesity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Effects of Combined Training on Visceral Adiposity Index and Metabolic Phenotype in Obesity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Introduction: The role of obesity in developing metabolic alterations is related to the distribution of adipose tissue, and visceral fat predisposes people to a higher risk than subcutaneous fat. The effect of different forms of periodization of combined training is still unknown in reducing cardiometabolic risk in adults with obesity. This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effects of 16 weeks of periodized combined training with fixed and linear increase intensities on individuals with obesity, using the visceral adiposity index (VAI) and metabolic phenotype. Methods: In total, 59 adults with obesity (61.0% female) were allocated into three groups: control (CG, 34.4 ± 6.9 years; BMI, 33.0 ± 2.5 kg.m-2), combined training with fixed intensity (FG, 33.6 ± 8.4 years; BMI, 32.9 ± 2.3 kg.m-2), and linear increase intensity (LG, 34.5 ± 6.0 years; BMI, 33.4 ± 2.8 kg.m-2) in a 1:1:1 ratio. VAI equations were used with waist circumference, triglycerides, BMI, and HDL-c. The metabolic phenotype was defined by the presence of >3 abnormalities of the following: systolic/diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, HDL-c, fasting blood glucose, and waist circumference, classified as metabolically healthy and unhealthy (MHO; MUO). Intra- and intergroup analyses were performed per protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) using the Generalized Estimated Equations method. p < 0.10 was the level of significance adopted for interaction, and p < 0.05 was the level of significance for the isolated effect of time and/or group. Results: VAI decreased in FG (p < 0.001) in PP and ITT analyses, but not in LG in either analysis (p > 0.05). There was a higher number of MUO in FG compared to LG, only in PP, considering the effect of group analysis (p < 0.01), but not of time or group * time or ITT analyses (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Combined training with fixed intensity improved VAI but was insufficient to affect metabolic phenotype. These findings suggest minimal differences between fixed intensity and linear increase protocols in reducing the risk of metabolic complications during obesity treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信