Júlia Elena Fontana Ronsani, Mariana Papini Gabiatti, Anne Ribeiro Streb, Rodrigo Sudatti Delevatti, Giovani Firpo Del Duca, Fernanda Hansen
{"title":"联合训练对肥胖患者内脏脂肪指数和代谢表型的影响:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Júlia Elena Fontana Ronsani, Mariana Papini Gabiatti, Anne Ribeiro Streb, Rodrigo Sudatti Delevatti, Giovani Firpo Del Duca, Fernanda Hansen","doi":"10.3390/ijerph22091462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: The role of obesity in developing metabolic alterations is related to the distribution of adipose tissue, and visceral fat predisposes people to a higher risk than subcutaneous fat. The effect of different forms of periodization of combined training is still unknown in reducing cardiometabolic risk in adults with obesity. This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effects of 16 weeks of periodized combined training with fixed and linear increase intensities on individuals with obesity, using the visceral adiposity index (VAI) and metabolic phenotype. <b>Methods</b>: In total, 59 adults with obesity (61.0% female) were allocated into three groups: control (CG, 34.4 ± 6.9 years; BMI, 33.0 ± 2.5 kg.m<sup>-2</sup>), combined training with fixed intensity (FG, 33.6 ± 8.4 years; BMI, 32.9 ± 2.3 kg.m<sup>-2</sup>), and linear increase intensity (LG, 34.5 ± 6.0 years; BMI, 33.4 ± 2.8 kg.m<sup>-2</sup>) in a 1:1:1 ratio. VAI equations were used with waist circumference, triglycerides, BMI, and HDL-c. The metabolic phenotype was defined by the presence of >3 abnormalities of the following: systolic/diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, HDL-c, fasting blood glucose, and waist circumference, classified as metabolically healthy and unhealthy (MHO; MUO). Intra- and intergroup analyses were performed per protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) using the Generalized Estimated Equations method. <i>p</i> < 0.10 was the level of significance adopted for interaction, and <i>p</i> < 0.05 was the level of significance for the isolated effect of time and/or group. <b>Results</b>: VAI decreased in FG (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in PP and ITT analyses, but not in LG in either analysis (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There was a higher number of MUO in FG compared to LG, only in PP, considering the effect of group analysis (<i>p</i> < 0.01), but not of time or group * time or ITT analyses (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: Combined training with fixed intensity improved VAI but was insufficient to affect metabolic phenotype. These findings suggest minimal differences between fixed intensity and linear increase protocols in reducing the risk of metabolic complications during obesity treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"22 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Combined Training on Visceral Adiposity Index and Metabolic Phenotype in Obesity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Júlia Elena Fontana Ronsani, Mariana Papini Gabiatti, Anne Ribeiro Streb, Rodrigo Sudatti Delevatti, Giovani Firpo Del Duca, Fernanda Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ijerph22091462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: The role of obesity in developing metabolic alterations is related to the distribution of adipose tissue, and visceral fat predisposes people to a higher risk than subcutaneous fat. The effect of different forms of periodization of combined training is still unknown in reducing cardiometabolic risk in adults with obesity. This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effects of 16 weeks of periodized combined training with fixed and linear increase intensities on individuals with obesity, using the visceral adiposity index (VAI) and metabolic phenotype. <b>Methods</b>: In total, 59 adults with obesity (61.0% female) were allocated into three groups: control (CG, 34.4 ± 6.9 years; BMI, 33.0 ± 2.5 kg.m<sup>-2</sup>), combined training with fixed intensity (FG, 33.6 ± 8.4 years; BMI, 32.9 ± 2.3 kg.m<sup>-2</sup>), and linear increase intensity (LG, 34.5 ± 6.0 years; BMI, 33.4 ± 2.8 kg.m<sup>-2</sup>) in a 1:1:1 ratio. VAI equations were used with waist circumference, triglycerides, BMI, and HDL-c. The metabolic phenotype was defined by the presence of >3 abnormalities of the following: systolic/diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, HDL-c, fasting blood glucose, and waist circumference, classified as metabolically healthy and unhealthy (MHO; MUO). Intra- and intergroup analyses were performed per protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) using the Generalized Estimated Equations method. <i>p</i> < 0.10 was the level of significance adopted for interaction, and <i>p</i> < 0.05 was the level of significance for the isolated effect of time and/or group. <b>Results</b>: VAI decreased in FG (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in PP and ITT analyses, but not in LG in either analysis (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There was a higher number of MUO in FG compared to LG, only in PP, considering the effect of group analysis (<i>p</i> < 0.01), but not of time or group * time or ITT analyses (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: Combined training with fixed intensity improved VAI but was insufficient to affect metabolic phenotype. These findings suggest minimal differences between fixed intensity and linear increase protocols in reducing the risk of metabolic complications during obesity treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"22 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469366/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091462\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Combined Training on Visceral Adiposity Index and Metabolic Phenotype in Obesity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Introduction: The role of obesity in developing metabolic alterations is related to the distribution of adipose tissue, and visceral fat predisposes people to a higher risk than subcutaneous fat. The effect of different forms of periodization of combined training is still unknown in reducing cardiometabolic risk in adults with obesity. This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effects of 16 weeks of periodized combined training with fixed and linear increase intensities on individuals with obesity, using the visceral adiposity index (VAI) and metabolic phenotype. Methods: In total, 59 adults with obesity (61.0% female) were allocated into three groups: control (CG, 34.4 ± 6.9 years; BMI, 33.0 ± 2.5 kg.m-2), combined training with fixed intensity (FG, 33.6 ± 8.4 years; BMI, 32.9 ± 2.3 kg.m-2), and linear increase intensity (LG, 34.5 ± 6.0 years; BMI, 33.4 ± 2.8 kg.m-2) in a 1:1:1 ratio. VAI equations were used with waist circumference, triglycerides, BMI, and HDL-c. The metabolic phenotype was defined by the presence of >3 abnormalities of the following: systolic/diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, HDL-c, fasting blood glucose, and waist circumference, classified as metabolically healthy and unhealthy (MHO; MUO). Intra- and intergroup analyses were performed per protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) using the Generalized Estimated Equations method. p < 0.10 was the level of significance adopted for interaction, and p < 0.05 was the level of significance for the isolated effect of time and/or group. Results: VAI decreased in FG (p < 0.001) in PP and ITT analyses, but not in LG in either analysis (p > 0.05). There was a higher number of MUO in FG compared to LG, only in PP, considering the effect of group analysis (p < 0.01), but not of time or group * time or ITT analyses (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Combined training with fixed intensity improved VAI but was insufficient to affect metabolic phenotype. These findings suggest minimal differences between fixed intensity and linear increase protocols in reducing the risk of metabolic complications during obesity treatment.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health.
The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.