质重于量:日常社会互动与孤独感之间的关系。

3区 综合性期刊
Siyun Peng, Adam R Roth
{"title":"质重于量:日常社会互动与孤独感之间的关系。","authors":"Siyun Peng, Adam R Roth","doi":"10.3390/ijerph22091411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding what aspects of daily life protect against loneliness is increasingly important for promoting well-being among older adults. This study investigates how different types of everyday social interactions are associated with chronic loneliness. We analyze data that were collected via in-home surveys and an ecological momentary assessment module from a probability-based sample of 272 adults aged 55 and older residing in Indiana. Participants were prompted four times per day over the course of seven days to report on their current activities and social experiences. Contrary to common assumptions, the quantitative measures of daily social interactions, such as the proportion of moments spent alone, the proportion of moments spent socializing, and the mean number of interaction partners during the study period were not significantly related to loneliness. However, the qualitative measures of social interactions-specifically, the presence of bonding social capital (e.g., emotional closeness) and the absence of stressful interactions-were associated with lower levels of loneliness. These findings underscore the importance of emotionally meaningful engagement and social strain over the sheer frequency or quantity of interactions, suggesting that the quality of daily social experiences is a key factor in supporting mental well-being in later life.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"22 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality over Quantity: The Association Between Daily Social Interactions and Loneliness.\",\"authors\":\"Siyun Peng, Adam R Roth\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ijerph22091411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding what aspects of daily life protect against loneliness is increasingly important for promoting well-being among older adults. This study investigates how different types of everyday social interactions are associated with chronic loneliness. We analyze data that were collected via in-home surveys and an ecological momentary assessment module from a probability-based sample of 272 adults aged 55 and older residing in Indiana. Participants were prompted four times per day over the course of seven days to report on their current activities and social experiences. Contrary to common assumptions, the quantitative measures of daily social interactions, such as the proportion of moments spent alone, the proportion of moments spent socializing, and the mean number of interaction partners during the study period were not significantly related to loneliness. However, the qualitative measures of social interactions-specifically, the presence of bonding social capital (e.g., emotional closeness) and the absence of stressful interactions-were associated with lower levels of loneliness. These findings underscore the importance of emotionally meaningful engagement and social strain over the sheer frequency or quantity of interactions, suggesting that the quality of daily social experiences is a key factor in supporting mental well-being in later life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"22 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470029/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091411\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解日常生活的哪些方面可以防止孤独,对于促进老年人的健康越来越重要。这项研究调查了不同类型的日常社会互动与慢性孤独感的关系。我们分析了通过家庭调查和生态瞬间评估模块收集的数据,这些数据来自居住在印第安纳州的272名55岁及以上成年人的基于概率的样本。研究人员在七天的时间里,每天四次要求参与者报告他们目前的活动和社交经历。与通常的假设相反,在研究期间,日常社会互动的定量指标,如独处时间的比例、社交时间的比例以及互动伙伴的平均数量,与孤独感没有显著关系。然而,社会互动的定性测量-特别是,结合社会资本的存在(例如,情感亲密)和缺乏压力互动-与较低的孤独感水平相关。这些发现强调了情感上有意义的参与和社会压力的重要性,而不仅仅是互动的频率或数量,这表明日常社交体验的质量是支持晚年心理健康的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Quality over Quantity: The Association Between Daily Social Interactions and Loneliness.

Quality over Quantity: The Association Between Daily Social Interactions and Loneliness.

Quality over Quantity: The Association Between Daily Social Interactions and Loneliness.

Quality over Quantity: The Association Between Daily Social Interactions and Loneliness.

Understanding what aspects of daily life protect against loneliness is increasingly important for promoting well-being among older adults. This study investigates how different types of everyday social interactions are associated with chronic loneliness. We analyze data that were collected via in-home surveys and an ecological momentary assessment module from a probability-based sample of 272 adults aged 55 and older residing in Indiana. Participants were prompted four times per day over the course of seven days to report on their current activities and social experiences. Contrary to common assumptions, the quantitative measures of daily social interactions, such as the proportion of moments spent alone, the proportion of moments spent socializing, and the mean number of interaction partners during the study period were not significantly related to loneliness. However, the qualitative measures of social interactions-specifically, the presence of bonding social capital (e.g., emotional closeness) and the absence of stressful interactions-were associated with lower levels of loneliness. These findings underscore the importance of emotionally meaningful engagement and social strain over the sheer frequency or quantity of interactions, suggesting that the quality of daily social experiences is a key factor in supporting mental well-being in later life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信