葡萄样品中‘番茄候选植物原体’的液滴数字PCR检测与定量研究。

IF 3.5 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Lucia Landi, Sergio Murolo, Gianfranco Romanazzi
{"title":"葡萄样品中‘番茄候选植物原体’的液滴数字PCR检测与定量研究。","authors":"Lucia Landi, Sergio Murolo, Gianfranco Romanazzi","doi":"10.3390/biology14091251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>'<i>Candidatus</i> Phytoplasma solani' is the causal agent of the Bois noir (BN), affecting grapevine worldwide. The complex epidemiology of BN, which involves multiple '<i>Ca</i>. P. solani' host plants and insect vectors, as well as the occurrence of recovery (loss of symptoms on grapevine canopy), makes disease investigations and containment in vineyards difficult. To achieve early detection of '<i>Ca</i>. P. solani', a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-based approach and quantitative (q)PCR assay were compared, testing specific primers based on the elongation factor Tu (<i>tuf</i>) gene using SYBR Green chemistry. The regression curve analysis of the ddPCR assay showed good linearity. Compared with the qPCR method, the sensitivity of ddPCR improved about 10-fold. The analysis of grapevine roots spiked with serial dilutions of '<i>Ca</i> P. solani'. PCR <i>tuf</i> fragments showed that qPCR was inhibited, while ddPCR was not affected. Testing 66 grapevine samples from 50 grapevine plants, the ddPCR provided superior diagnostic performance compared to qPCR in roots of symptomatic plants (75% detected by ddPCR, 41.6% by qPCR), roots of recovered plants (58.8% detected by ddPCR, 25% by qPCR), and asymptomatic leaf tissues from recovered plants (75% detected by ddPCR, 25% by qPCR). The ddPCR analysis allowed us to detect '<i>Ca</i>. P. solani' on 40% of leaf samples from recovered plants and 20% of roots from asymptomatic plants. No differences among ddPCR and qPCR were found in detecting phytoplasma on symptomatic leaf samples. The ddPCR assay allowed the absolute quantification of '<i>Ca</i>. P. solani' in complex matrices, such as roots, and when low titer of phytoplasma is present.</p>","PeriodicalId":48624,"journal":{"name":"Biology-Basel","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Droplet Digital PCR Assay for Detection and Quantification of '<i>Candidatus</i> Phytoplasma solani' in Grapevine Samples.\",\"authors\":\"Lucia Landi, Sergio Murolo, Gianfranco Romanazzi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/biology14091251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>'<i>Candidatus</i> Phytoplasma solani' is the causal agent of the Bois noir (BN), affecting grapevine worldwide. The complex epidemiology of BN, which involves multiple '<i>Ca</i>. P. solani' host plants and insect vectors, as well as the occurrence of recovery (loss of symptoms on grapevine canopy), makes disease investigations and containment in vineyards difficult. To achieve early detection of '<i>Ca</i>. P. solani', a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-based approach and quantitative (q)PCR assay were compared, testing specific primers based on the elongation factor Tu (<i>tuf</i>) gene using SYBR Green chemistry. The regression curve analysis of the ddPCR assay showed good linearity. Compared with the qPCR method, the sensitivity of ddPCR improved about 10-fold. The analysis of grapevine roots spiked with serial dilutions of '<i>Ca</i> P. solani'. PCR <i>tuf</i> fragments showed that qPCR was inhibited, while ddPCR was not affected. Testing 66 grapevine samples from 50 grapevine plants, the ddPCR provided superior diagnostic performance compared to qPCR in roots of symptomatic plants (75% detected by ddPCR, 41.6% by qPCR), roots of recovered plants (58.8% detected by ddPCR, 25% by qPCR), and asymptomatic leaf tissues from recovered plants (75% detected by ddPCR, 25% by qPCR). The ddPCR analysis allowed us to detect '<i>Ca</i>. P. solani' on 40% of leaf samples from recovered plants and 20% of roots from asymptomatic plants. No differences among ddPCR and qPCR were found in detecting phytoplasma on symptomatic leaf samples. The ddPCR assay allowed the absolute quantification of '<i>Ca</i>. P. solani' in complex matrices, such as roots, and when low titer of phytoplasma is present.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology-Basel\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467802/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14091251\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14091251","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

候选植物原体(Candidatus Phytoplasma solani)是引起Bois noir (BN)的病原菌,影响全世界的葡萄。BN的复杂流行病学,涉及多种“茄茄Ca. P. solani”寄主植物和昆虫媒介,以及恢复的发生(葡萄藤树冠上的症状消失),使葡萄园的疾病调查和控制变得困难。为了实现“Ca. P. solani”的早期检测,比较了基于液滴数字PCR (ddPCR)的方法和定量PCR (q)方法,使用SYBR Green化学检测基于延伸因子Tu (tuf)基因的特异性引物。回归曲线分析显示,ddPCR法线性良好。与qPCR方法相比,ddPCR的灵敏度提高了约10倍。连续稀释‘Ca P. solani’对葡萄根茎的分析。PCR簇状片段显示qPCR被抑制,而ddPCR不受影响。对50株葡萄植株的66份葡萄样品进行了检测,结果表明,与qPCR相比,ddPCR对有症状植株根系(ddPCR检测75%,qPCR检测41.6%)、恢复植株根系(ddPCR检测58.8%,qPCR检测25%)和恢复植株无症状叶片组织(ddPCR检测75%,qPCR检测25%)的诊断效果更好。ddPCR分析使我们能够在恢复植物的40%的叶片样品和20%的无症状植物的根样品中检测到“Ca. P. solani”。ddPCR与qPCR在有症状叶片上检测植原体的效果无显著差异。ddPCR检测允许在复杂基质(如根)和存在低滴度植原体的情况下绝对定量‘Ca. P. solani’。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Droplet Digital PCR Assay for Detection and Quantification of 'Candidatus Phytoplasma solani' in Grapevine Samples.

'Candidatus Phytoplasma solani' is the causal agent of the Bois noir (BN), affecting grapevine worldwide. The complex epidemiology of BN, which involves multiple 'Ca. P. solani' host plants and insect vectors, as well as the occurrence of recovery (loss of symptoms on grapevine canopy), makes disease investigations and containment in vineyards difficult. To achieve early detection of 'Ca. P. solani', a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-based approach and quantitative (q)PCR assay were compared, testing specific primers based on the elongation factor Tu (tuf) gene using SYBR Green chemistry. The regression curve analysis of the ddPCR assay showed good linearity. Compared with the qPCR method, the sensitivity of ddPCR improved about 10-fold. The analysis of grapevine roots spiked with serial dilutions of 'Ca P. solani'. PCR tuf fragments showed that qPCR was inhibited, while ddPCR was not affected. Testing 66 grapevine samples from 50 grapevine plants, the ddPCR provided superior diagnostic performance compared to qPCR in roots of symptomatic plants (75% detected by ddPCR, 41.6% by qPCR), roots of recovered plants (58.8% detected by ddPCR, 25% by qPCR), and asymptomatic leaf tissues from recovered plants (75% detected by ddPCR, 25% by qPCR). The ddPCR analysis allowed us to detect 'Ca. P. solani' on 40% of leaf samples from recovered plants and 20% of roots from asymptomatic plants. No differences among ddPCR and qPCR were found in detecting phytoplasma on symptomatic leaf samples. The ddPCR assay allowed the absolute quantification of 'Ca. P. solani' in complex matrices, such as roots, and when low titer of phytoplasma is present.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology-Basel
Biology-Basel Biological Science-Biological Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1618
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology (ISSN 2079-7737) is an international, peer-reviewed, quick-refereeing open access journal of Biological Science published by MDPI online. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications in all areas of biology and at the interface of related disciplines. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信