Amal Ali Alharbi, Wesam Taher Almagharbeh, Hazem AbdulKareem Alfanash, Khaldoon Aied Alnawafleh, Amal Ali Alasmari, Sameer A Alkubati, Malik A Altayar, Nesreen AbdelMonaem AbouZeid, Khulud Ahmad Rezq, Elham H Othman
{"title":"护理教育中的全患者技术：学生和教师观念的横断面分析。","authors":"Amal Ali Alharbi, Wesam Taher Almagharbeh, Hazem AbdulKareem Alfanash, Khaldoon Aied Alnawafleh, Amal Ali Alasmari, Sameer A Alkubati, Malik A Altayar, Nesreen AbdelMonaem AbouZeid, Khulud Ahmad Rezq, Elham H Othman","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03856-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Holopatient technology, a mixed reality simulation tool, is increasingly used in nursing education to enhance clinical reasoning and student engagement. However, differences in perception between students and faculty remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 126 participants (84 nursing students and 42 faculty members) at a Saudi Arabian nursing college. All participants had prior exposure to Holopatient scenarios, including adult medical-surgical and maternal health cases. A researcher-developed, 20-item Likert-scale questionnaire assessed four domains: perceived effectiveness, overall satisfaction, ease of use, and implementation challenges. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multiple regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students rated perceived effectiveness significantly higher (mean [M] = 4.2, standard deviation [SD] = 0.6) than faculty (M = 3.8, SD = 0.8; p < 0.01). Satisfaction was also higher among students (M = 4.1, SD = 0.7) than faculty (M = 3.7, SD = 0.9). Ease of use was similar (M = 4.0 vs. 3.9), while faculty reported more implementation challenges (M = 3.5, SD = 0.9) than students (M = 3.0, SD = 0.6). A significant association was found between faculty teaching experience and perceived challenges (χ<sup>2</sup> (4) = 15.78, p < 0.05). Regression analysis showed that prior simulation exposure (β = 0.35, p < 0.001), digital literacy (β = 0.28, p = 0.01), and fewer teaching years (β = -0.15, p = 0.05) predicted more positive perceptions. The model explained 35% of the variance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Students expressed more favourable perceptions of Holopatient technology than faculty. Digital literacy and prior simulation exposure were strong predictors of acceptance, while longer teaching experience was linked to lower enthusiasm. Faculty development and targeted support are essential for successful adoption.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"1192"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Holopatient technology in nursing education: a cross-sectional analysis of student and faculty perceptions.\",\"authors\":\"Amal Ali Alharbi, Wesam Taher Almagharbeh, Hazem AbdulKareem Alfanash, Khaldoon Aied Alnawafleh, Amal Ali Alasmari, Sameer A Alkubati, Malik A Altayar, Nesreen AbdelMonaem AbouZeid, Khulud Ahmad Rezq, Elham H Othman\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12912-025-03856-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Holopatient technology, a mixed reality simulation tool, is increasingly used in nursing education to enhance clinical reasoning and student engagement. However, differences in perception between students and faculty remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 126 participants (84 nursing students and 42 faculty members) at a Saudi Arabian nursing college. All participants had prior exposure to Holopatient scenarios, including adult medical-surgical and maternal health cases. A researcher-developed, 20-item Likert-scale questionnaire assessed four domains: perceived effectiveness, overall satisfaction, ease of use, and implementation challenges. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multiple regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students rated perceived effectiveness significantly higher (mean [M] = 4.2, standard deviation [SD] = 0.6) than faculty (M = 3.8, SD = 0.8; p < 0.01). Satisfaction was also higher among students (M = 4.1, SD = 0.7) than faculty (M = 3.7, SD = 0.9). Ease of use was similar (M = 4.0 vs. 3.9), while faculty reported more implementation challenges (M = 3.5, SD = 0.9) than students (M = 3.0, SD = 0.6). A significant association was found between faculty teaching experience and perceived challenges (χ<sup>2</sup> (4) = 15.78, p < 0.05). Regression analysis showed that prior simulation exposure (β = 0.35, p < 0.001), digital literacy (β = 0.28, p = 0.01), and fewer teaching years (β = -0.15, p = 0.05) predicted more positive perceptions. The model explained 35% of the variance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Students expressed more favourable perceptions of Holopatient technology than faculty. Digital literacy and prior simulation exposure were strong predictors of acceptance, while longer teaching experience was linked to lower enthusiasm. Faculty development and targeted support are essential for successful adoption.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465255/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03856-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03856-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景：Holopatient技术是一种混合现实模拟工具，越来越多地应用于护理教育中，以提高临床推理能力和学生参与度。然而，学生和教师之间的认知差异仍未得到充分研究。方法：采用横断面调查的方法，对沙特阿拉伯一所护理学院的126名参与者（84名护理专业学生和42名教职员工）进行调查。所有参与者之前都接触过全息病人方案，包括成人内科手术和产妇保健案例。研究人员开发了一份20项李克特量表问卷，评估了四个领域：感知有效性、总体满意度、易用性和实施挑战。采用描述性统计、卡方检验和多元回归分析。结果：学生对感知效能的评价（平均[M] = 4.2，标准差[SD] = 0.6）显著高于教师（M = 3.8, SD = 0.8; p 2 (4) = 15.78, p 2 = 0.35）。结论：学生对holopentent技术的好感度高于教师。数字素养和之前的模拟接触是接受度的有力预测因素，而较长的教学经验与较低的热情有关。教师发展和有针对性的支持是成功采用的关键。临床试验号：不适用。
Holopatient technology in nursing education: a cross-sectional analysis of student and faculty perceptions.
Background: Holopatient technology, a mixed reality simulation tool, is increasingly used in nursing education to enhance clinical reasoning and student engagement. However, differences in perception between students and faculty remain underexplored.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 126 participants (84 nursing students and 42 faculty members) at a Saudi Arabian nursing college. All participants had prior exposure to Holopatient scenarios, including adult medical-surgical and maternal health cases. A researcher-developed, 20-item Likert-scale questionnaire assessed four domains: perceived effectiveness, overall satisfaction, ease of use, and implementation challenges. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multiple regression analyses were performed.
Results: Students rated perceived effectiveness significantly higher (mean [M] = 4.2, standard deviation [SD] = 0.6) than faculty (M = 3.8, SD = 0.8; p < 0.01). Satisfaction was also higher among students (M = 4.1, SD = 0.7) than faculty (M = 3.7, SD = 0.9). Ease of use was similar (M = 4.0 vs. 3.9), while faculty reported more implementation challenges (M = 3.5, SD = 0.9) than students (M = 3.0, SD = 0.6). A significant association was found between faculty teaching experience and perceived challenges (χ2 (4) = 15.78, p < 0.05). Regression analysis showed that prior simulation exposure (β = 0.35, p < 0.001), digital literacy (β = 0.28, p = 0.01), and fewer teaching years (β = -0.15, p = 0.05) predicted more positive perceptions. The model explained 35% of the variance (R2 = 0.35).
Conclusions: Students expressed more favourable perceptions of Holopatient technology than faculty. Digital literacy and prior simulation exposure were strong predictors of acceptance, while longer teaching experience was linked to lower enthusiasm. Faculty development and targeted support are essential for successful adoption.
期刊介绍：
BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
