意大利有视力障碍和无视力障碍儿童大肌肉运动技能表现的评估。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Giulia Chiara Castiglioni, Giulia Hirn, Marco Lippolis, Matteo Porro
{"title":"意大利有视力障碍和无视力障碍儿童大肌肉运动技能表现的评估。","authors":"Giulia Chiara Castiglioni, Giulia Hirn, Marco Lippolis, Matteo Porro","doi":"10.3390/children12091197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Vision plays a key role in acquiring and automating fundamental movement skills. Evidence from Italy is scarce. This study compared Test of Gross Motor Development-2 (TGMD-2) performance between Italian children with visual impairment (VI) and sighted peers and explored differences by degree of VI (severe VI vs. blindness).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study including 38 children (VI: <i>n</i> = 19, 5-12 y; sighted: <i>n</i> = 19, 5-11 y). VI was classified per the WHO criteria. TGMD-2 was administered with adaptations suitable for VI (e.g., high-contrast cones, auditory balls, verbal cueing). Group differences (VI vs. sighted; blindness vs. severe VI; severe VI vs. sighted) were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U (α = 0.05). For participants > 10 y, raw scores were analyzed and age-equivalent scores were summarized to calculate developmental gaps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children with VI scored lower than sighted peers on locomotor, object control, and total TGMD-2 scores (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). Within VI, blindness was associated with lower locomotor, object control, and total scores than severe VI (<i>p</i> = 0.013; <i>p</i> = 0.043; <i>p</i> = 0.013). Children with severe VI also scored lower than sighted peers across outcomes (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). Based on age-equivalent estimates, average gross motor performance in VI was ~4-5 years below chronological age; values < 3 years were set to 3 years for calculation (the floor effect).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Italian children with VI show reduced gross motor competence compared with sighted peers, with a substantial developmental lag. Findings support early adapted physical education and structured movement opportunities to promote participation and inclusion. Future studies should examine long-term outcomes and contextual factors shaping motor competence in youth with VI.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Gross Motor Skills Performance in Italian Children with and Without Visual Impairment.\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Chiara Castiglioni, Giulia Hirn, Marco Lippolis, Matteo Porro\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/children12091197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Vision plays a key role in acquiring and automating fundamental movement skills. Evidence from Italy is scarce. This study compared Test of Gross Motor Development-2 (TGMD-2) performance between Italian children with visual impairment (VI) and sighted peers and explored differences by degree of VI (severe VI vs. blindness).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study including 38 children (VI: <i>n</i> = 19, 5-12 y; sighted: <i>n</i> = 19, 5-11 y). VI was classified per the WHO criteria. TGMD-2 was administered with adaptations suitable for VI (e.g., high-contrast cones, auditory balls, verbal cueing). Group differences (VI vs. sighted; blindness vs. severe VI; severe VI vs. sighted) were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U (α = 0.05). For participants > 10 y, raw scores were analyzed and age-equivalent scores were summarized to calculate developmental gaps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children with VI scored lower than sighted peers on locomotor, object control, and total TGMD-2 scores (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). Within VI, blindness was associated with lower locomotor, object control, and total scores than severe VI (<i>p</i> = 0.013; <i>p</i> = 0.043; <i>p</i> = 0.013). Children with severe VI also scored lower than sighted peers across outcomes (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). Based on age-equivalent estimates, average gross motor performance in VI was ~4-5 years below chronological age; values < 3 years were set to 3 years for calculation (the floor effect).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Italian children with VI show reduced gross motor competence compared with sighted peers, with a substantial developmental lag. Findings support early adapted physical education and structured movement opportunities to promote participation and inclusion. Future studies should examine long-term outcomes and contextual factors shaping motor competence in youth with VI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children-Basel\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468307/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091197\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目标:视觉在获得和自动化基本运动技能中起着关键作用。来自意大利的证据很少。本研究比较了意大利视力障碍儿童(VI)与正常同龄人大肌肉运动发育测试(TGMD-2)的表现,并探讨了VI程度(严重VI与失明)的差异。方法:这是一项横断面研究,包括38名儿童(VI: n = 19,5 -12岁;视力:n = 19,5 -11岁)。根据世卫组织的标准对VI进行了分类。TGMD-2给予适合于VI的适应性(例如,高对比度锥体,听觉球,言语提示)。组间差异(VI vs.正常;失明vs.重度VI;重度VI vs.正常)采用Mann-Whitney U分析(α = 0.05)。对于10岁至10岁的参与者,分析原始分数并汇总年龄等效分数以计算发展差距。结果:视障儿童在运动、物体控制和TGMD-2总分上得分低于正常同龄人(均p < 0.001)。在VI中,与严重VI相比,失明与较低的运动、物体控制和总分相关(p = 0.013; p = 0.043; p = 0.013)。严重VI患儿的得分也低于视力正常的同龄人(均p < 0.001)。根据年龄等效估计,六年级大肌肉运动的平均表现比实足年龄低4-5岁;< 3年的值设为3年计算(地板效应)。结论:意大利的VI儿童与视力正常的同龄人相比,大肌肉运动能力下降,发育滞后。研究结果支持早期适应性体育教育和有组织的运动机会,以促进参与和包容。未来的研究应该检查长期结果和环境因素塑造运动能力的青少年VI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessment of Gross Motor Skills Performance in Italian Children with and Without Visual Impairment.

Assessment of Gross Motor Skills Performance in Italian Children with and Without Visual Impairment.

Assessment of Gross Motor Skills Performance in Italian Children with and Without Visual Impairment.

Assessment of Gross Motor Skills Performance in Italian Children with and Without Visual Impairment.

Background/objectives: Vision plays a key role in acquiring and automating fundamental movement skills. Evidence from Italy is scarce. This study compared Test of Gross Motor Development-2 (TGMD-2) performance between Italian children with visual impairment (VI) and sighted peers and explored differences by degree of VI (severe VI vs. blindness).

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study including 38 children (VI: n = 19, 5-12 y; sighted: n = 19, 5-11 y). VI was classified per the WHO criteria. TGMD-2 was administered with adaptations suitable for VI (e.g., high-contrast cones, auditory balls, verbal cueing). Group differences (VI vs. sighted; blindness vs. severe VI; severe VI vs. sighted) were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U (α = 0.05). For participants > 10 y, raw scores were analyzed and age-equivalent scores were summarized to calculate developmental gaps.

Results: Children with VI scored lower than sighted peers on locomotor, object control, and total TGMD-2 scores (all p < 0.001). Within VI, blindness was associated with lower locomotor, object control, and total scores than severe VI (p = 0.013; p = 0.043; p = 0.013). Children with severe VI also scored lower than sighted peers across outcomes (all p < 0.001). Based on age-equivalent estimates, average gross motor performance in VI was ~4-5 years below chronological age; values < 3 years were set to 3 years for calculation (the floor effect).

Conclusions: Italian children with VI show reduced gross motor competence compared with sighted peers, with a substantial developmental lag. Findings support early adapted physical education and structured movement opportunities to promote participation and inclusion. Future studies should examine long-term outcomes and contextual factors shaping motor competence in youth with VI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信