评估人工智能驱动的远程监测系统,以获得可靠的临床照片采集和患者可用性。

IF 3.2 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mohammed H Elnagar, Hilary Nieberg-Baskin, Mary Kay Becher, Zachary Joseph Mellion, Blake R Borello, Brian Wilk, Rayan Skafi
{"title":"评估人工智能驱动的远程监测系统,以获得可靠的临床照片采集和患者可用性。","authors":"Mohammed H Elnagar, Hilary Nieberg-Baskin, Mary Kay Becher, Zachary Joseph Mellion, Blake R Borello, Brian Wilk, Rayan Skafi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the validity and usability of DentalMonitoring (DM), an Artificial Intelligence Driven Remote Monitoring (AIDRM) system, in providing standardized, high-quality photo sets that are clinically suitable for the visual assessment of various clinical parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent prospective multi-centric investigations were conducted: The first, a usability investigation, included 63 patients from five sites in the United States. Its goal was to evaluate the usability of DM across four age groups, including individuals with physical disabilities. Patients provided subjective feedback through a questionnaire, while healthcare professionals conducted an objective evaluation of task performance. The second, a validity investigation, involved 104 patients from five other sites in the United States. This study aimed to compare the visual assessment of DM picture sets against the gold standard of standardized live assessments conducted by the same dental expert. Five clinical parameters per arch were evaluated, resulting in a total of 1,040 visual assessment parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the usability investigation, most patients were able to achieve the steps with relative ease with no significant differences between types of participants. In the validity investigation, the global agreement between the two evaluations for the 1040 results generated for the five clinical parameters pooled was 98.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found that DM was user-friendly for all participants and that the photosets produced by the DM scans were substantially equivalent to the clinical live assessments conducted by dental experts. This suggests that DM is a highly reliable AIDRM tool, allowing healthcare professionals and patients to consistently produce high-quality image sets without requiring assistance or prior experience. This achievement opens the door to a new paradigm in orthodontic patient follow-up and may bring new dental prevention and treatment follow-up strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing an AI-driven remote monitoring system for reliable clinical photo acquisition and patient usability.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed H Elnagar, Hilary Nieberg-Baskin, Mary Kay Becher, Zachary Joseph Mellion, Blake R Borello, Brian Wilk, Rayan Skafi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the validity and usability of DentalMonitoring (DM), an Artificial Intelligence Driven Remote Monitoring (AIDRM) system, in providing standardized, high-quality photo sets that are clinically suitable for the visual assessment of various clinical parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent prospective multi-centric investigations were conducted: The first, a usability investigation, included 63 patients from five sites in the United States. Its goal was to evaluate the usability of DM across four age groups, including individuals with physical disabilities. Patients provided subjective feedback through a questionnaire, while healthcare professionals conducted an objective evaluation of task performance. The second, a validity investigation, involved 104 patients from five other sites in the United States. This study aimed to compare the visual assessment of DM picture sets against the gold standard of standardized live assessments conducted by the same dental expert. Five clinical parameters per arch were evaluated, resulting in a total of 1,040 visual assessment parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the usability investigation, most patients were able to achieve the steps with relative ease with no significant differences between types of participants. In the validity investigation, the global agreement between the two evaluations for the 1040 results generated for the five clinical parameters pooled was 98.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found that DM was user-friendly for all participants and that the photosets produced by the DM scans were substantially equivalent to the clinical live assessments conducted by dental experts. This suggests that DM is a highly reliable AIDRM tool, allowing healthcare professionals and patients to consistently produce high-quality image sets without requiring assistance or prior experience. This achievement opens the door to a new paradigm in orthodontic patient follow-up and may bring new dental prevention and treatment follow-up strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.08.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.08.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估牙科监测(DM),一种人工智能驱动的远程监测(AIDRM)系统,在提供标准化、高质量的照片集方面的有效性和可用性,这些照片集在临床上适用于各种临床参数的视觉评估。方法:进行了两项独立的前瞻性多中心调查:第一项是可用性调查,包括来自美国五个地点的63名患者。其目标是评估糖尿病在四个年龄组的可用性,包括身体残疾的个体。患者通过问卷提供主观反馈,医护人员对任务表现进行客观评价。第二项是有效性调查,涉及来自美国其他五个地方的104名患者。本研究旨在比较DM图片集的视觉评估与由同一牙科专家进行的标准化现场评估的金标准。每弓评估5个临床参数,共1,040个视觉评估参数。结果:在可用性调查中,大多数患者能够相对轻松地完成步骤,受试者类型之间无显著差异。在效度调查中,两种评价对5个临床参数汇总产生的1040个结果的总体一致性为98.9%。结论:研究发现DM对所有参与者都是用户友好的,并且DM扫描产生的照片基本上等同于牙科专家进行的临床现场评估。这表明DM是一种高度可靠的AIDRM工具,允许医疗保健专业人员和患者在不需要帮助或先前经验的情况下始终如一地生成高质量的图像集。这一成果为正畸患者随访开辟了新的范式,并可能带来新的口腔防治随访策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing an AI-driven remote monitoring system for reliable clinical photo acquisition and patient usability.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and usability of DentalMonitoring (DM), an Artificial Intelligence Driven Remote Monitoring (AIDRM) system, in providing standardized, high-quality photo sets that are clinically suitable for the visual assessment of various clinical parameters.

Methods: Two independent prospective multi-centric investigations were conducted: The first, a usability investigation, included 63 patients from five sites in the United States. Its goal was to evaluate the usability of DM across four age groups, including individuals with physical disabilities. Patients provided subjective feedback through a questionnaire, while healthcare professionals conducted an objective evaluation of task performance. The second, a validity investigation, involved 104 patients from five other sites in the United States. This study aimed to compare the visual assessment of DM picture sets against the gold standard of standardized live assessments conducted by the same dental expert. Five clinical parameters per arch were evaluated, resulting in a total of 1,040 visual assessment parameters.

Results: In the usability investigation, most patients were able to achieve the steps with relative ease with no significant differences between types of participants. In the validity investigation, the global agreement between the two evaluations for the 1040 results generated for the five clinical parameters pooled was 98.9%.

Conclusions: The study found that DM was user-friendly for all participants and that the photosets produced by the DM scans were substantially equivalent to the clinical live assessments conducted by dental experts. This suggests that DM is a highly reliable AIDRM tool, allowing healthcare professionals and patients to consistently produce high-quality image sets without requiring assistance or prior experience. This achievement opens the door to a new paradigm in orthodontic patient follow-up and may bring new dental prevention and treatment follow-up strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信