Federica Sancassiani, Vanessa Barrui, Fabrizio Bert, Sara Carucci, Fatma Charfi, Giulia Cossu, Arne Holte, Jutta Lindert, Simone Marchini, Alessandra Perra, Samantha Pinna, Antonio Egidio Nardi, Alessandra Scano, Cesar A Soutullo, Massimo Tusconi, Diego Primavera
{"title":"迈向理解青少年心理健康的多层次框架的演化序文:一项国际德尔菲研究。","authors":"Federica Sancassiani, Vanessa Barrui, Fabrizio Bert, Sara Carucci, Fatma Charfi, Giulia Cossu, Arne Holte, Jutta Lindert, Simone Marchini, Alessandra Perra, Samantha Pinna, Antonio Egidio Nardi, Alessandra Scano, Cesar A Soutullo, Massimo Tusconi, Diego Primavera","doi":"10.3390/children12091189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Adolescence is a sensitive developmental window shaped by both vulnerabilities and adaptive potential. From an evolutionary standpoint, mental health difficulties in this period may represent functional responses to environmental stressors rather than mere dysfunctions. Despite increasing interest, integrative models capturing the dynamic interplay of risk and protective factors in adolescent mental health remain limited. This study presents a holistic, multi-level framework grounded in ecological and evolutionary theories to improve understanding and intervention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-round Delphi method was used to develop and validate the framework. Twelve experts in adolescent mental health evaluated a preliminary draft derived from the literature. In Round 1, 12 items were rated across five criteria (YES/NO format), with feedback provided when consensus thresholds were not met. Revisions were made using consensus index scores. In Round 2, the revised draft was assessed across eight broader dimensions. A consensus threshold of 0.75 was used in both rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve out of thirteen experts (92%) agreed to join the panel. Round 1 item scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.85, with an average consensus index of 0.78. In Round 2, ratings improved significantly, ranging from 0.82 to 1.0, with an average of 0.95. The Steering Committee incorporated expert feedback by refining the structure, deepening content, updating sources, and clarifying key components.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The final framework allows for the clustering of indicators across macro-, medium-, and micro-level domains. It offers a robust foundation for future research and the development of targeted, evolutionarily informed mental health interventions for adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evolutionary Preamble Towards a Multilevel Framework to Understand Adolescent Mental Health: An International Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"Federica Sancassiani, Vanessa Barrui, Fabrizio Bert, Sara Carucci, Fatma Charfi, Giulia Cossu, Arne Holte, Jutta Lindert, Simone Marchini, Alessandra Perra, Samantha Pinna, Antonio Egidio Nardi, Alessandra Scano, Cesar A Soutullo, Massimo Tusconi, Diego Primavera\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/children12091189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Adolescence is a sensitive developmental window shaped by both vulnerabilities and adaptive potential. From an evolutionary standpoint, mental health difficulties in this period may represent functional responses to environmental stressors rather than mere dysfunctions. Despite increasing interest, integrative models capturing the dynamic interplay of risk and protective factors in adolescent mental health remain limited. This study presents a holistic, multi-level framework grounded in ecological and evolutionary theories to improve understanding and intervention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-round Delphi method was used to develop and validate the framework. Twelve experts in adolescent mental health evaluated a preliminary draft derived from the literature. In Round 1, 12 items were rated across five criteria (YES/NO format), with feedback provided when consensus thresholds were not met. Revisions were made using consensus index scores. In Round 2, the revised draft was assessed across eight broader dimensions. A consensus threshold of 0.75 was used in both rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve out of thirteen experts (92%) agreed to join the panel. Round 1 item scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.85, with an average consensus index of 0.78. In Round 2, ratings improved significantly, ranging from 0.82 to 1.0, with an average of 0.95. The Steering Committee incorporated expert feedback by refining the structure, deepening content, updating sources, and clarifying key components.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The final framework allows for the clustering of indicators across macro-, medium-, and micro-level domains. It offers a robust foundation for future research and the development of targeted, evolutionarily informed mental health interventions for adolescents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children-Basel\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468673/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091189\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Evolutionary Preamble Towards a Multilevel Framework to Understand Adolescent Mental Health: An International Delphi Study.
Background/objectives: Adolescence is a sensitive developmental window shaped by both vulnerabilities and adaptive potential. From an evolutionary standpoint, mental health difficulties in this period may represent functional responses to environmental stressors rather than mere dysfunctions. Despite increasing interest, integrative models capturing the dynamic interplay of risk and protective factors in adolescent mental health remain limited. This study presents a holistic, multi-level framework grounded in ecological and evolutionary theories to improve understanding and intervention strategies.
Methods: A two-round Delphi method was used to develop and validate the framework. Twelve experts in adolescent mental health evaluated a preliminary draft derived from the literature. In Round 1, 12 items were rated across five criteria (YES/NO format), with feedback provided when consensus thresholds were not met. Revisions were made using consensus index scores. In Round 2, the revised draft was assessed across eight broader dimensions. A consensus threshold of 0.75 was used in both rounds.
Results: Twelve out of thirteen experts (92%) agreed to join the panel. Round 1 item scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.85, with an average consensus index of 0.78. In Round 2, ratings improved significantly, ranging from 0.82 to 1.0, with an average of 0.95. The Steering Committee incorporated expert feedback by refining the structure, deepening content, updating sources, and clarifying key components.
Conclusions: The final framework allows for the clustering of indicators across macro-, medium-, and micro-level domains. It offers a robust foundation for future research and the development of targeted, evolutionarily informed mental health interventions for adolescents.
期刊介绍:
Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries.
The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.