迈向理解青少年心理健康的多层次框架的演化序文:一项国际德尔菲研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Federica Sancassiani, Vanessa Barrui, Fabrizio Bert, Sara Carucci, Fatma Charfi, Giulia Cossu, Arne Holte, Jutta Lindert, Simone Marchini, Alessandra Perra, Samantha Pinna, Antonio Egidio Nardi, Alessandra Scano, Cesar A Soutullo, Massimo Tusconi, Diego Primavera
{"title":"迈向理解青少年心理健康的多层次框架的演化序文:一项国际德尔菲研究。","authors":"Federica Sancassiani, Vanessa Barrui, Fabrizio Bert, Sara Carucci, Fatma Charfi, Giulia Cossu, Arne Holte, Jutta Lindert, Simone Marchini, Alessandra Perra, Samantha Pinna, Antonio Egidio Nardi, Alessandra Scano, Cesar A Soutullo, Massimo Tusconi, Diego Primavera","doi":"10.3390/children12091189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Adolescence is a sensitive developmental window shaped by both vulnerabilities and adaptive potential. From an evolutionary standpoint, mental health difficulties in this period may represent functional responses to environmental stressors rather than mere dysfunctions. Despite increasing interest, integrative models capturing the dynamic interplay of risk and protective factors in adolescent mental health remain limited. This study presents a holistic, multi-level framework grounded in ecological and evolutionary theories to improve understanding and intervention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-round Delphi method was used to develop and validate the framework. Twelve experts in adolescent mental health evaluated a preliminary draft derived from the literature. In Round 1, 12 items were rated across five criteria (YES/NO format), with feedback provided when consensus thresholds were not met. Revisions were made using consensus index scores. In Round 2, the revised draft was assessed across eight broader dimensions. A consensus threshold of 0.75 was used in both rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve out of thirteen experts (92%) agreed to join the panel. Round 1 item scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.85, with an average consensus index of 0.78. In Round 2, ratings improved significantly, ranging from 0.82 to 1.0, with an average of 0.95. The Steering Committee incorporated expert feedback by refining the structure, deepening content, updating sources, and clarifying key components.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The final framework allows for the clustering of indicators across macro-, medium-, and micro-level domains. It offers a robust foundation for future research and the development of targeted, evolutionarily informed mental health interventions for adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evolutionary Preamble Towards a Multilevel Framework to Understand Adolescent Mental Health: An International Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"Federica Sancassiani, Vanessa Barrui, Fabrizio Bert, Sara Carucci, Fatma Charfi, Giulia Cossu, Arne Holte, Jutta Lindert, Simone Marchini, Alessandra Perra, Samantha Pinna, Antonio Egidio Nardi, Alessandra Scano, Cesar A Soutullo, Massimo Tusconi, Diego Primavera\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/children12091189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Adolescence is a sensitive developmental window shaped by both vulnerabilities and adaptive potential. From an evolutionary standpoint, mental health difficulties in this period may represent functional responses to environmental stressors rather than mere dysfunctions. Despite increasing interest, integrative models capturing the dynamic interplay of risk and protective factors in adolescent mental health remain limited. This study presents a holistic, multi-level framework grounded in ecological and evolutionary theories to improve understanding and intervention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-round Delphi method was used to develop and validate the framework. Twelve experts in adolescent mental health evaluated a preliminary draft derived from the literature. In Round 1, 12 items were rated across five criteria (YES/NO format), with feedback provided when consensus thresholds were not met. Revisions were made using consensus index scores. In Round 2, the revised draft was assessed across eight broader dimensions. A consensus threshold of 0.75 was used in both rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve out of thirteen experts (92%) agreed to join the panel. Round 1 item scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.85, with an average consensus index of 0.78. In Round 2, ratings improved significantly, ranging from 0.82 to 1.0, with an average of 0.95. The Steering Committee incorporated expert feedback by refining the structure, deepening content, updating sources, and clarifying key components.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The final framework allows for the clustering of indicators across macro-, medium-, and micro-level domains. It offers a robust foundation for future research and the development of targeted, evolutionarily informed mental health interventions for adolescents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children-Basel\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468673/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091189\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:青春期是由脆弱性和适应潜力共同塑造的一个敏感的发展窗口期。从进化的角度来看,这一时期的心理健康问题可能是对环境压力的功能性反应,而不仅仅是功能障碍。尽管越来越多的兴趣,综合模型捕捉青少年心理健康的风险和保护因素的动态相互作用仍然有限。本研究提出了一个以生态学和进化理论为基础的整体的、多层次的框架,以提高理解和干预策略。方法:采用两轮德尔菲法制定并验证该框架。12位青少年心理健康专家评估了一份来自文献的初步草案。在第一轮中,12个项目根据5个标准(YES/NO格式)进行评分,当共识阈值未达到时提供反馈。使用共识指数得分进行了修订。在第二轮中,修订后的草案从八个更广泛的方面进行了评估。两轮均采用0.75的共识阈值。结果:13位专家中有12位(92%)同意加入专家组。第一轮项目得分从0.72到0.85不等,平均共识指数为0.78。在第二轮中,评分显著提高,从0.82到1.0,平均为0.95。指导委员会通过细化结构、深化内容、更新来源、明确关键组成部分等措施吸纳了专家反馈意见。结论:最终的框架允许跨宏观、中期和微观层面领域的指标聚类。它为未来的研究和发展有针对性的、进化上知情的青少年心理健康干预措施提供了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Evolutionary Preamble Towards a Multilevel Framework to Understand Adolescent Mental Health: An International Delphi Study.

Background/objectives: Adolescence is a sensitive developmental window shaped by both vulnerabilities and adaptive potential. From an evolutionary standpoint, mental health difficulties in this period may represent functional responses to environmental stressors rather than mere dysfunctions. Despite increasing interest, integrative models capturing the dynamic interplay of risk and protective factors in adolescent mental health remain limited. This study presents a holistic, multi-level framework grounded in ecological and evolutionary theories to improve understanding and intervention strategies.

Methods: A two-round Delphi method was used to develop and validate the framework. Twelve experts in adolescent mental health evaluated a preliminary draft derived from the literature. In Round 1, 12 items were rated across five criteria (YES/NO format), with feedback provided when consensus thresholds were not met. Revisions were made using consensus index scores. In Round 2, the revised draft was assessed across eight broader dimensions. A consensus threshold of 0.75 was used in both rounds.

Results: Twelve out of thirteen experts (92%) agreed to join the panel. Round 1 item scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.85, with an average consensus index of 0.78. In Round 2, ratings improved significantly, ranging from 0.82 to 1.0, with an average of 0.95. The Steering Committee incorporated expert feedback by refining the structure, deepening content, updating sources, and clarifying key components.

Conclusions: The final framework allows for the clustering of indicators across macro-, medium-, and micro-level domains. It offers a robust foundation for future research and the development of targeted, evolutionarily informed mental health interventions for adolescents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信