临时骨水泥垫片治疗复杂桡骨头骨折1例报告。

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
César Alejandro Jiménez-Aroche, Mishelle Pérez de León, Arturo Saldivar-Moreno, Mariela Hernández-Pavón
{"title":"临时骨水泥垫片治疗复杂桡骨头骨折1例报告。","authors":"César Alejandro Jiménez-Aroche, Mishelle Pérez de León, Arturo Saldivar-Moreno, Mariela Hernández-Pavón","doi":"10.12659/AJCR.948197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND The management of comminuted and displaced radial head fractures (Mason III), particularly when associated with dislocation (Mason IV) or Essex-Lopresti injury, presents a complex surgical challenge. Treatment options include conservative management, surgical fixation, arthroplasty, or radial head resection; however, no consensus exists regarding the optimal approach for all injury types. Radial head resection is often preferred in complex cases with multiple fragments where reconstruction is unfeasible. While functional and radiological outcomes vary widely, there is a growing trend toward the use of prosthetic implants as the initial treatment to maintain elbow function and stability, with temporary implants employed when definitive ones are unavailable. CASE REPORT We present the case of a 46-year-old patient who underwent radial head resection and received a cemented radial head spacer as temporary management due to the unavailability of a definitive implant. Functional status was monitored over a 21-month period. Our aim was to identify a readily available operating room material capable of effectively neutralizing valgus and axial forces. Since the spacer is intended as a temporary solution, it must be removed or replaced with a definitive implant approximately 4-6 months postoperatively, once stability is reestablished. Beyond this period, bone lysis has been observed. CONCLUSIONS The significance of this case report lies in highlighting alternative options for radial head replacement in complex, irreparable fractures, proposing an easily accessible solution available in any orthopedic operating room. It is further distinguished by its extended follow-up period (21 months) and by providing evidence of the long-term tolerability of cemented spacers - an aspect that has been infrequently reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":39064,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Case Reports","volume":"26 ","pages":"e948197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporary Cemented Spacer for Complex Radial Head Fractures: A Case Report.\",\"authors\":\"César Alejandro Jiménez-Aroche, Mishelle Pérez de León, Arturo Saldivar-Moreno, Mariela Hernández-Pavón\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/AJCR.948197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND The management of comminuted and displaced radial head fractures (Mason III), particularly when associated with dislocation (Mason IV) or Essex-Lopresti injury, presents a complex surgical challenge. Treatment options include conservative management, surgical fixation, arthroplasty, or radial head resection; however, no consensus exists regarding the optimal approach for all injury types. Radial head resection is often preferred in complex cases with multiple fragments where reconstruction is unfeasible. While functional and radiological outcomes vary widely, there is a growing trend toward the use of prosthetic implants as the initial treatment to maintain elbow function and stability, with temporary implants employed when definitive ones are unavailable. CASE REPORT We present the case of a 46-year-old patient who underwent radial head resection and received a cemented radial head spacer as temporary management due to the unavailability of a definitive implant. Functional status was monitored over a 21-month period. Our aim was to identify a readily available operating room material capable of effectively neutralizing valgus and axial forces. Since the spacer is intended as a temporary solution, it must be removed or replaced with a definitive implant approximately 4-6 months postoperatively, once stability is reestablished. Beyond this period, bone lysis has been observed. CONCLUSIONS The significance of this case report lies in highlighting alternative options for radial head replacement in complex, irreparable fractures, proposing an easily accessible solution available in any orthopedic operating room. It is further distinguished by its extended follow-up period (21 months) and by providing evidence of the long-term tolerability of cemented spacers - an aspect that has been infrequently reported.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"e948197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482758/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.948197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.948197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

粉碎性和移位性桡骨头骨折(Mason III型)的治疗,特别是合并脱位(Mason IV型)或Essex-Lopresti损伤时,是一个复杂的手术挑战。治疗方案包括保守管理、手术固定、关节成形术或桡骨头切除术;然而,对于所有损伤类型的最佳治疗方法尚无共识。桡骨头切除术往往是首选的复杂情况下,多碎片重建是不可行的。虽然功能和放射学结果差异很大,但越来越多的趋势是使用假体植入物作为维持肘关节功能和稳定性的初始治疗,当无法获得确定的植入物时使用临时植入物。病例报告我们报告了一例46岁的患者,由于无法获得明确的植入物,他接受了桡骨头切除术,并接受了骨水泥桡骨头垫片作为临时治疗。在21个月的时间里监测功能状态。我们的目的是确定一种易于获得的手术室材料,能够有效地中和外翻和轴向力。由于隔离器是一种临时解决方案,因此在术后4-6个月,一旦恢复稳定,必须将其移除或替换为确定的植入物。在此之后,观察到骨溶解。结论:本病例报告的意义在于强调了复杂、不可修复骨折桡骨头置换术的替代方案,提出了一种在任何骨科手术室都可获得的易于获得的解决方案。它的进一步特点是其延长的随访期(21个月),并提供了胶结隔离剂长期耐受性的证据——这方面很少报道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporary Cemented Spacer for Complex Radial Head Fractures: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND The management of comminuted and displaced radial head fractures (Mason III), particularly when associated with dislocation (Mason IV) or Essex-Lopresti injury, presents a complex surgical challenge. Treatment options include conservative management, surgical fixation, arthroplasty, or radial head resection; however, no consensus exists regarding the optimal approach for all injury types. Radial head resection is often preferred in complex cases with multiple fragments where reconstruction is unfeasible. While functional and radiological outcomes vary widely, there is a growing trend toward the use of prosthetic implants as the initial treatment to maintain elbow function and stability, with temporary implants employed when definitive ones are unavailable. CASE REPORT We present the case of a 46-year-old patient who underwent radial head resection and received a cemented radial head spacer as temporary management due to the unavailability of a definitive implant. Functional status was monitored over a 21-month period. Our aim was to identify a readily available operating room material capable of effectively neutralizing valgus and axial forces. Since the spacer is intended as a temporary solution, it must be removed or replaced with a definitive implant approximately 4-6 months postoperatively, once stability is reestablished. Beyond this period, bone lysis has been observed. CONCLUSIONS The significance of this case report lies in highlighting alternative options for radial head replacement in complex, irreparable fractures, proposing an easily accessible solution available in any orthopedic operating room. It is further distinguished by its extended follow-up period (21 months) and by providing evidence of the long-term tolerability of cemented spacers - an aspect that has been infrequently reported.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Case Reports
American Journal of Case Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
599
期刊介绍: American Journal of Case Reports is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes single and series case reports in all medical fields. American Journal of Case Reports is issued on a continuous basis as a primary electronic journal. Print copies of a single article or a set of articles can be ordered on demand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信