[病例式助产护理的出生结局:一项回顾性队列研究]。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lea-Ori Schlatter, Lissa Egger, Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin
{"title":"[病例式助产护理的出生结局:一项回顾性队列研究]。","authors":"Lea-Ori Schlatter, Lissa Egger, Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin","doi":"10.1055/a-2678-7930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While international studies highlight the positive impact on birth outcomes associated with caseload midwives, no comprehensive assessment of the Swiss situation has been performed.This study aimed to assess birth outcomes in Swiss hospitals and in low-risk pregnancies in relation to birth care provided by hospital-based staff midwives compared to attending caseload midwives.For this retrospective cohort study, we used data of n=55,518 low-risk births collected between 2018 and 2021 through voluntary data collection in Swiss hospitals. We performed a descriptive analysis as well as non-parametric correlative and logistic regression analysis using SPSS.Women with caseload midwives were more often multiparous than women with hospital-based staff midwives. The adjusted regression analysis showed that care by attending caseload midwives increased the ratio of spontaneous delivery compared to hospital-based staff midwives (83.1% vs. 70.2%, aOR 1.97, p<0.001). The C-section rate was lower in women in the caseload care system (9.2% vs. 16.6%, aOR 0.55, p<0.001) as well as the rate of vacuum extractions (7.6% vs. 13.0%, aOR 0.63, p<0.001). Care by a caseload midwife was associated with fewer interventions during labour and birth in general. Caseload midwives commonly improve birth outcomes compared to hospital-based staff midwives with respect to mitigating presumably unnecessary interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Birth Outcomes in Caseload Midwifery Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study].\",\"authors\":\"Lea-Ori Schlatter, Lissa Egger, Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2678-7930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While international studies highlight the positive impact on birth outcomes associated with caseload midwives, no comprehensive assessment of the Swiss situation has been performed.This study aimed to assess birth outcomes in Swiss hospitals and in low-risk pregnancies in relation to birth care provided by hospital-based staff midwives compared to attending caseload midwives.For this retrospective cohort study, we used data of n=55,518 low-risk births collected between 2018 and 2021 through voluntary data collection in Swiss hospitals. We performed a descriptive analysis as well as non-parametric correlative and logistic regression analysis using SPSS.Women with caseload midwives were more often multiparous than women with hospital-based staff midwives. The adjusted regression analysis showed that care by attending caseload midwives increased the ratio of spontaneous delivery compared to hospital-based staff midwives (83.1% vs. 70.2%, aOR 1.97, p<0.001). The C-section rate was lower in women in the caseload care system (9.2% vs. 16.6%, aOR 0.55, p<0.001) as well as the rate of vacuum extractions (7.6% vs. 13.0%, aOR 0.63, p<0.001). Care by a caseload midwife was associated with fewer interventions during labour and birth in general. Caseload midwives commonly improve birth outcomes compared to hospital-based staff midwives with respect to mitigating presumably unnecessary interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2678-7930\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2678-7930","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然国际研究强调了与病例助产士相关的分娩结果的积极影响,但尚未对瑞士的情况进行全面评估。本研究旨在评估瑞士医院和低风险妊娠的分娩结果与医院工作人员助产士提供的分娩护理的关系,并与参加病例助产士进行比较。在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们使用了2018年至2021年期间通过瑞士医院自愿收集的n=55,518例低风险新生儿的数据。我们使用SPSS进行了描述性分析以及非参数相关和逻辑回归分析。有接生员的妇女比有医院接生员的妇女更容易多产。调整后的回归分析显示,与医院工作人员助产士相比,参加病例接生员的护理增加了自然分娩的比例(83.1%对70.2%,aOR 1.97, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Birth Outcomes in Caseload Midwifery Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study].

While international studies highlight the positive impact on birth outcomes associated with caseload midwives, no comprehensive assessment of the Swiss situation has been performed.This study aimed to assess birth outcomes in Swiss hospitals and in low-risk pregnancies in relation to birth care provided by hospital-based staff midwives compared to attending caseload midwives.For this retrospective cohort study, we used data of n=55,518 low-risk births collected between 2018 and 2021 through voluntary data collection in Swiss hospitals. We performed a descriptive analysis as well as non-parametric correlative and logistic regression analysis using SPSS.Women with caseload midwives were more often multiparous than women with hospital-based staff midwives. The adjusted regression analysis showed that care by attending caseload midwives increased the ratio of spontaneous delivery compared to hospital-based staff midwives (83.1% vs. 70.2%, aOR 1.97, p<0.001). The C-section rate was lower in women in the caseload care system (9.2% vs. 16.6%, aOR 0.55, p<0.001) as well as the rate of vacuum extractions (7.6% vs. 13.0%, aOR 0.63, p<0.001). Care by a caseload midwife was associated with fewer interventions during labour and birth in general. Caseload midwives commonly improve birth outcomes compared to hospital-based staff midwives with respect to mitigating presumably unnecessary interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gynäkologen, Geburtshelfer, Hebammen, Neonatologen, Pädiater
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信