蛙皮同源合成生物碱和蛙皮提取物的急性毒性:小型试验评价大水蚤的毒性。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Michael Méndez-Rivera, Didier Ramírez-Morales, Abel Mora-Machado, Heike Pröhl, Ariel Rodríguez, Takuya Okada, Naoki Toyooka, Roberto Ibáñez, Carlos E Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Giselle Tamayo-Castillo
{"title":"蛙皮同源合成生物碱和蛙皮提取物的急性毒性:小型试验评价大水蚤的毒性。","authors":"Michael Méndez-Rivera, Didier Ramírez-Morales, Abel Mora-Machado, Heike Pröhl, Ariel Rodríguez, Takuya Okada, Naoki Toyooka, Roberto Ibáñez, Carlos E Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Giselle Tamayo-Castillo","doi":"10.1016/j.toxicon.2025.108599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The determination of toxicity in samples from natural extracts or products of organic synthesis represents a challenge due to the low available volume of these kinds of matrices. A miniaturized immobilization acute test in Daphnia magna was implemented at microplate-scale to determine the relative toxicity in 13 synthetic alkaloids, analogous to those found in the skin of frogs, and skin-extracts from 18 individuals of the frog Oophaga vicentei. The test revealed moderate or moderate to low toxicity towards the daphnids for all tested synthetic alkaloids after a 48-h exposure. The correlation of relative toxicity and several parameters in frog samples revealed that: (i) toxicity is not associated with frog coloration (aposematism) or their geographical location; and (ii) toxicity is dependent on the profile of alkaloid composition rather than the total alkaloid content. Results from this work provide an alternative method to assay toxicity in limited-volume samples, useful to elucidate potential aposematic-related differences in dendrobatid frogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23289,"journal":{"name":"Toxicon","volume":" ","pages":"108599"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute toxicity of frog-skin-homologous synthetic alkaloids and frog-skin extracts: miniaturized test to evaluate toxicity with Daphnia magna.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Méndez-Rivera, Didier Ramírez-Morales, Abel Mora-Machado, Heike Pröhl, Ariel Rodríguez, Takuya Okada, Naoki Toyooka, Roberto Ibáñez, Carlos E Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Giselle Tamayo-Castillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.toxicon.2025.108599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The determination of toxicity in samples from natural extracts or products of organic synthesis represents a challenge due to the low available volume of these kinds of matrices. A miniaturized immobilization acute test in Daphnia magna was implemented at microplate-scale to determine the relative toxicity in 13 synthetic alkaloids, analogous to those found in the skin of frogs, and skin-extracts from 18 individuals of the frog Oophaga vicentei. The test revealed moderate or moderate to low toxicity towards the daphnids for all tested synthetic alkaloids after a 48-h exposure. The correlation of relative toxicity and several parameters in frog samples revealed that: (i) toxicity is not associated with frog coloration (aposematism) or their geographical location; and (ii) toxicity is dependent on the profile of alkaloid composition rather than the total alkaloid content. Results from this work provide an alternative method to assay toxicity in limited-volume samples, useful to elucidate potential aposematic-related differences in dendrobatid frogs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"108599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2025.108599\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2025.108599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

天然提取物或有机合成产物样品的毒性测定是一个挑战,因为这类基质的可用体积很小。在微板尺度上对大水蚤进行了小型固定急性试验,以确定13种合成生物碱的相对毒性,这些生物碱类似于青蛙皮肤中发现的生物碱,以及18只青蛙Oophaga vicentei的皮肤提取物。试验结果显示,所有被试合成生物碱在暴露48小时后对水蚤具有中等或中低毒性。青蛙样本的相对毒性与若干参数的相关性显示:(i)毒性与青蛙的颜色(警告)或其地理位置无关;(ii)毒性取决于生物碱组成的轮廓,而不是总生物碱含量。这项工作的结果提供了一种在有限体积样品中测定毒性的替代方法,有助于阐明石斛蛙中潜在的警示相关差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute toxicity of frog-skin-homologous synthetic alkaloids and frog-skin extracts: miniaturized test to evaluate toxicity with Daphnia magna.

The determination of toxicity in samples from natural extracts or products of organic synthesis represents a challenge due to the low available volume of these kinds of matrices. A miniaturized immobilization acute test in Daphnia magna was implemented at microplate-scale to determine the relative toxicity in 13 synthetic alkaloids, analogous to those found in the skin of frogs, and skin-extracts from 18 individuals of the frog Oophaga vicentei. The test revealed moderate or moderate to low toxicity towards the daphnids for all tested synthetic alkaloids after a 48-h exposure. The correlation of relative toxicity and several parameters in frog samples revealed that: (i) toxicity is not associated with frog coloration (aposematism) or their geographical location; and (ii) toxicity is dependent on the profile of alkaloid composition rather than the total alkaloid content. Results from this work provide an alternative method to assay toxicity in limited-volume samples, useful to elucidate potential aposematic-related differences in dendrobatid frogs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicon
Toxicon 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Toxicon has an open access mirror Toxicon: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. An introductory offer Toxicon: X - full waiver of the Open Access fee. Toxicon''s "aims and scope" are to publish: -articles containing the results of original research on problems related to toxins derived from animals, plants and microorganisms -papers on novel findings related to the chemical, pharmacological, toxicological, and immunological properties of natural toxins -molecular biological studies of toxins and other genes from poisonous and venomous organisms that advance understanding of the role or function of toxins -clinical observations on poisoning and envenoming where a new therapeutic principle has been proposed or a decidedly superior clinical result has been obtained. -material on the use of toxins as tools in studying biological processes and material on subjects related to venom and antivenom problems. -articles on the translational application of toxins, for example as drugs and insecticides -epidemiological studies on envenoming or poisoning, so long as they highlight a previously unrecognised medical problem or provide insight into the prevention or medical treatment of envenoming or poisoning. Retrospective surveys of hospital records, especially those lacking species identification, will not be considered for publication. Properly designed prospective community-based surveys are strongly encouraged. -articles describing well-known activities of venoms, such as antibacterial, anticancer, and analgesic activities of arachnid venoms, without any attempt to define the mechanism of action or purify the active component, will not be considered for publication in Toxicon. -review articles on problems related to toxinology. To encourage the exchange of ideas, sections of the journal may be devoted to Short Communications, Letters to the Editor and activities of the affiliated societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信