厌氧消化和土壤中典型PPCPs的降解。

IF 4.1 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Toxics Pub Date : 2025-09-15 DOI:10.3390/toxics13090780
Min Guo, Linyue Xu, Liguo Guo, Jie Hu, Ru Liu
{"title":"厌氧消化和土壤中典型PPCPs的降解。","authors":"Min Guo, Linyue Xu, Liguo Guo, Jie Hu, Ru Liu","doi":"10.3390/toxics13090780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Degradation is a key natural attenuation mechanism governing the fate of PPCPs during anaerobic digestion (AD) and subsequent soil exposure. Nevertheless, the combined impact of this sequential treatment (AD followed by land application) remains poorly understood. This study evaluated the degradation characteristics of nine PPCPs during mesophilic AD in three distinct soil types. The concentration changes in the nine PPCPs were monitored after 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 days of anaerobic incubation at 38 °C, as well as after 0, 2, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20, and 30 days of dark incubation at 25 °C with humidity at 75% in three soils. AD effectively removed sulfamethoxydiazine, ciprofloxacin, and oxytetracycline (>80%). The removal efficiencies for carbamazepine, progesterone, triclosan, naproxen, and megestrol acetate were relatively poor, with the removal rates ranging from 50% to 80%, while gemfibrozil exhibited minimal degradation (<50%). The degradation behavior of nine PPCPs fits well with first-order kinetic equations. Calculated half-lives (days) in the three soils were as follows: sulfamethoxydiazine (20.39 to 23.10), carbamazepine (36.48 to 77.02), megestrol acetate (11.18 to 20.39), progesterone (6.08 to 23.90), ciprofloxacin (11.75 to 63.01), oxytetracycline (13.08 to 30.14), naproxen (7.79 to 40.77), gemfibrozil (8.45 to 30.14), and triclosan (14.75 to 46.21). The corresponding R<sup>2</sup> values ranged from 0.8882 to 0.9320 for sulfamethoxydiazine, 0.8579 to 0.9248 for carbamazepine, 0.8745 to 0.9658 for megestrol acetate, 0.9026 to 0.9560 for progesterone, 0.8147 to 0.9571 for ciprofloxacin, 0.8136 to 0.9063 for oxytetracycline, 0.8961 to 0.9156 for naproxen, 0.8802 to 0.9497 for gemfibrozil, and 0.9099 to 0.9457 for triclosan. Soil physicochemical properties significantly influenced PPCP degradation rates. Gemfibrozil warrants immediate attention due to its poor degradation; the five PPCPs presenting moderate concern-namely carbamazepine, ciprofloxacin, oxytetracycline, naproxen, and triclosan-require further risk assessment, while sulfamethoxydiazine, megestrol acetate, and progesterone pose low persistence risk according to current evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Degradation of Typical PPCPs During Anaerobic Digestion and in Soil.\",\"authors\":\"Min Guo, Linyue Xu, Liguo Guo, Jie Hu, Ru Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/toxics13090780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Degradation is a key natural attenuation mechanism governing the fate of PPCPs during anaerobic digestion (AD) and subsequent soil exposure. Nevertheless, the combined impact of this sequential treatment (AD followed by land application) remains poorly understood. This study evaluated the degradation characteristics of nine PPCPs during mesophilic AD in three distinct soil types. The concentration changes in the nine PPCPs were monitored after 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 days of anaerobic incubation at 38 °C, as well as after 0, 2, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20, and 30 days of dark incubation at 25 °C with humidity at 75% in three soils. AD effectively removed sulfamethoxydiazine, ciprofloxacin, and oxytetracycline (>80%). The removal efficiencies for carbamazepine, progesterone, triclosan, naproxen, and megestrol acetate were relatively poor, with the removal rates ranging from 50% to 80%, while gemfibrozil exhibited minimal degradation (<50%). The degradation behavior of nine PPCPs fits well with first-order kinetic equations. Calculated half-lives (days) in the three soils were as follows: sulfamethoxydiazine (20.39 to 23.10), carbamazepine (36.48 to 77.02), megestrol acetate (11.18 to 20.39), progesterone (6.08 to 23.90), ciprofloxacin (11.75 to 63.01), oxytetracycline (13.08 to 30.14), naproxen (7.79 to 40.77), gemfibrozil (8.45 to 30.14), and triclosan (14.75 to 46.21). The corresponding R<sup>2</sup> values ranged from 0.8882 to 0.9320 for sulfamethoxydiazine, 0.8579 to 0.9248 for carbamazepine, 0.8745 to 0.9658 for megestrol acetate, 0.9026 to 0.9560 for progesterone, 0.8147 to 0.9571 for ciprofloxacin, 0.8136 to 0.9063 for oxytetracycline, 0.8961 to 0.9156 for naproxen, 0.8802 to 0.9497 for gemfibrozil, and 0.9099 to 0.9457 for triclosan. Soil physicochemical properties significantly influenced PPCP degradation rates. Gemfibrozil warrants immediate attention due to its poor degradation; the five PPCPs presenting moderate concern-namely carbamazepine, ciprofloxacin, oxytetracycline, naproxen, and triclosan-require further risk assessment, while sulfamethoxydiazine, megestrol acetate, and progesterone pose low persistence risk according to current evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxics\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474287/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13090780\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13090780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

降解是控制PPCPs在厌氧消化(AD)和随后的土壤暴露过程中命运的关键自然衰减机制。然而,这种顺序处理(AD后土地应用)的综合影响仍然知之甚少。本研究评估了3种不同土壤类型中温环境下9种PPCPs的降解特征。在38°C条件下厌氧培养0、5、10、15、20、25和30天,以及在25°C条件下湿度为75%的黑暗培养0、2、5、8、10、12、15、20和30天,对3种土壤中9种PPCPs的浓度变化进行监测。AD有效去除磺胺甲氧基二嗪、环丙沙星和土霉素(bbb80 %)。对卡马西平、黄体酮、三氯生、萘普生和醋酸甲地孕酮的去除率较差,去除率在50% ~ 80%之间,而吉非罗吉则表现出最小的降解能力(2值范围:磺胺甲氧基二嗪为0.8882 ~ 0.9320,卡马西平为0.8579 ~ 0.9248,醋酸甲地孕酮为0.8745 ~ 0.9658,黄体酮为0.9026 ~ 0.9560,环丙沙星为0.8147 ~ 0.9571,土霉素为0.8136 ~ 0.9063,萘普生为0.8961 ~ 0.9156;吉非罗齐为0.8802 ~ 0.9497,三氯生为0.9099 ~ 0.9457。土壤理化性质显著影响PPCP的降解速率。由于其降解性差,应立即予以关注;目前的证据表明,卡马西平、环丙沙星、土霉素、萘普生和三氯生这五种PPCPs存在中度风险,需要进一步的风险评估,而磺胺甲氧基二嗪、醋酸甲地孕酮和孕酮具有较低的持久性风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Degradation of Typical PPCPs During Anaerobic Digestion and in Soil.

Degradation of Typical PPCPs During Anaerobic Digestion and in Soil.

Degradation of Typical PPCPs During Anaerobic Digestion and in Soil.

Degradation of Typical PPCPs During Anaerobic Digestion and in Soil.

Degradation is a key natural attenuation mechanism governing the fate of PPCPs during anaerobic digestion (AD) and subsequent soil exposure. Nevertheless, the combined impact of this sequential treatment (AD followed by land application) remains poorly understood. This study evaluated the degradation characteristics of nine PPCPs during mesophilic AD in three distinct soil types. The concentration changes in the nine PPCPs were monitored after 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 days of anaerobic incubation at 38 °C, as well as after 0, 2, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20, and 30 days of dark incubation at 25 °C with humidity at 75% in three soils. AD effectively removed sulfamethoxydiazine, ciprofloxacin, and oxytetracycline (>80%). The removal efficiencies for carbamazepine, progesterone, triclosan, naproxen, and megestrol acetate were relatively poor, with the removal rates ranging from 50% to 80%, while gemfibrozil exhibited minimal degradation (<50%). The degradation behavior of nine PPCPs fits well with first-order kinetic equations. Calculated half-lives (days) in the three soils were as follows: sulfamethoxydiazine (20.39 to 23.10), carbamazepine (36.48 to 77.02), megestrol acetate (11.18 to 20.39), progesterone (6.08 to 23.90), ciprofloxacin (11.75 to 63.01), oxytetracycline (13.08 to 30.14), naproxen (7.79 to 40.77), gemfibrozil (8.45 to 30.14), and triclosan (14.75 to 46.21). The corresponding R2 values ranged from 0.8882 to 0.9320 for sulfamethoxydiazine, 0.8579 to 0.9248 for carbamazepine, 0.8745 to 0.9658 for megestrol acetate, 0.9026 to 0.9560 for progesterone, 0.8147 to 0.9571 for ciprofloxacin, 0.8136 to 0.9063 for oxytetracycline, 0.8961 to 0.9156 for naproxen, 0.8802 to 0.9497 for gemfibrozil, and 0.9099 to 0.9457 for triclosan. Soil physicochemical properties significantly influenced PPCP degradation rates. Gemfibrozil warrants immediate attention due to its poor degradation; the five PPCPs presenting moderate concern-namely carbamazepine, ciprofloxacin, oxytetracycline, naproxen, and triclosan-require further risk assessment, while sulfamethoxydiazine, megestrol acetate, and progesterone pose low persistence risk according to current evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxics
Toxics Chemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信