制备方法对毒伞制品中铅、镉含量的影响。

IF 4.1 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Toxics Pub Date : 2025-08-30 DOI:10.3390/toxics13090734
Michal Ordak, Wiktoria Gorecka, Pawel Konieczynski, Marek Wesolowski, Alina Plenis, Nasierowski Tadeusz, Bujalska-Zadrozny Magdalena
{"title":"制备方法对毒伞制品中铅、镉含量的影响。","authors":"Michal Ordak, Wiktoria Gorecka, Pawel Konieczynski, Marek Wesolowski, Alina Plenis, Nasierowski Tadeusz, Bujalska-Zadrozny Magdalena","doi":"10.3390/toxics13090734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, the consumption of <i>Amanita muscaria</i> has gained popularity as a perceived natural alternative to psychoactive substances, often promoted online for its supposed therapeutic properties. However, the safety of such preparations remains largely unverified, particularly with regard to toxic element content. The present study focused on evaluating how different preparation methods affect the concentrations of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) in the most commonly consumed <i>Amanita muscaria</i> products. A total of 50 mushroom caps were collected in October 2024 from the Stąporków Forest District in central Poland. Seven types of preparations were analyzed: dried with skin, dried without skin, tincture (mineralized and direct), boiled, fermented, infusion, and decoction. Samples were analyzed using atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS); depending on the preparation type, some underwent acid digestion prior to measurement. Statistically significant differences in lead concentrations were observed between the various preparation types (<i>p</i> = 0.002; η<sup>2</sup> = 0.97). Lead levels in the direct tincture were significantly higher than those in the boiled (<i>p</i> = 0.001), infusion (<i>p</i> = 0.001), decoction (<i>p</i> = 0.009), and dried without skin (<i>p</i> = 0.04) forms. Significant differences in cadmium concentrations were also found (<i>p</i> = 0.006; η<sup>2</sup> = 0.94), with lower Cd levels in the decoction compared to the dried with skin (<i>p</i> = 0.009) and without skin (<i>p</i> = 0.001), as well as in the fermented form compared to the dried samples (<i>p</i> = 0.03 and <i>p</i> = 0.004, respectively). These findings demonstrate that the type of preparation significantly influences the levels of cadmium and lead in <i>Amanita muscaria</i> products. While aqueous and fermented preparations showed reduced metal concentrations, none can be considered entirely safe, as even lower levels of Cd and Pb may pose health risks with frequent or excessive consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Preparation Methods on the Concentrations of Lead and Cadmium in <i>Amanita muscaria</i> Products.\",\"authors\":\"Michal Ordak, Wiktoria Gorecka, Pawel Konieczynski, Marek Wesolowski, Alina Plenis, Nasierowski Tadeusz, Bujalska-Zadrozny Magdalena\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/toxics13090734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In recent years, the consumption of <i>Amanita muscaria</i> has gained popularity as a perceived natural alternative to psychoactive substances, often promoted online for its supposed therapeutic properties. However, the safety of such preparations remains largely unverified, particularly with regard to toxic element content. The present study focused on evaluating how different preparation methods affect the concentrations of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) in the most commonly consumed <i>Amanita muscaria</i> products. A total of 50 mushroom caps were collected in October 2024 from the Stąporków Forest District in central Poland. Seven types of preparations were analyzed: dried with skin, dried without skin, tincture (mineralized and direct), boiled, fermented, infusion, and decoction. Samples were analyzed using atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS); depending on the preparation type, some underwent acid digestion prior to measurement. Statistically significant differences in lead concentrations were observed between the various preparation types (<i>p</i> = 0.002; η<sup>2</sup> = 0.97). Lead levels in the direct tincture were significantly higher than those in the boiled (<i>p</i> = 0.001), infusion (<i>p</i> = 0.001), decoction (<i>p</i> = 0.009), and dried without skin (<i>p</i> = 0.04) forms. Significant differences in cadmium concentrations were also found (<i>p</i> = 0.006; η<sup>2</sup> = 0.94), with lower Cd levels in the decoction compared to the dried with skin (<i>p</i> = 0.009) and without skin (<i>p</i> = 0.001), as well as in the fermented form compared to the dried samples (<i>p</i> = 0.03 and <i>p</i> = 0.004, respectively). These findings demonstrate that the type of preparation significantly influences the levels of cadmium and lead in <i>Amanita muscaria</i> products. While aqueous and fermented preparations showed reduced metal concentrations, none can be considered entirely safe, as even lower levels of Cd and Pb may pose health risks with frequent or excessive consumption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxics\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474102/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13090734\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13090734","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,毒金刚伞作为一种被认为是精神活性物质的天然替代品而受到欢迎,经常因其所谓的治疗特性而在网上推广。然而,这种制剂的安全性在很大程度上仍未得到证实,特别是在有毒元素含量方面。本研究的重点是评估不同的制备方法如何影响最常见的毒伞产品中镉(Cd)和铅(Pb)的浓度。2024年10月,在波兰中部Stąporków森林地区共收集了50个蘑菇帽。分析了7种制剂:带皮干燥、无皮干燥、酊剂(矿化和直接)、水煮、发酵、输液和煎煮。样品采用原子吸收光谱法(AAS)进行分析;根据制剂类型的不同,有些在测定前要进行酸消化。不同制剂间铅浓度差异有统计学意义(p = 0.002; η2 = 0.97)。直接酊剂中的铅含量显著高于煮沸(p = 0.001)、输液(p = 0.001)、煎煮(p = 0.009)和无皮干燥(p = 0.04)形式。镉浓度也存在显著差异(p = 0.006; η2 = 0.94),其中煎煮液中的镉含量低于带皮干燥样品(p = 0.009)和无皮干燥样品(p = 0.001),发酵样品中的镉含量低于干燥样品(p = 0.03和p = 0.004)。这些发现表明,制备类型显著影响毒蝇制品中镉和铅的含量。虽然水制剂和发酵制剂显示金属浓度降低,但没有一种制剂可以被认为是完全安全的,因为即使是更低水平的Cd和Pb也可能在频繁或过量食用时构成健康风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Influence of Preparation Methods on the Concentrations of Lead and Cadmium in <i>Amanita muscaria</i> Products.

Influence of Preparation Methods on the Concentrations of Lead and Cadmium in <i>Amanita muscaria</i> Products.

Influence of Preparation Methods on the Concentrations of Lead and Cadmium in <i>Amanita muscaria</i> Products.

Influence of Preparation Methods on the Concentrations of Lead and Cadmium in Amanita muscaria Products.

In recent years, the consumption of Amanita muscaria has gained popularity as a perceived natural alternative to psychoactive substances, often promoted online for its supposed therapeutic properties. However, the safety of such preparations remains largely unverified, particularly with regard to toxic element content. The present study focused on evaluating how different preparation methods affect the concentrations of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) in the most commonly consumed Amanita muscaria products. A total of 50 mushroom caps were collected in October 2024 from the Stąporków Forest District in central Poland. Seven types of preparations were analyzed: dried with skin, dried without skin, tincture (mineralized and direct), boiled, fermented, infusion, and decoction. Samples were analyzed using atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS); depending on the preparation type, some underwent acid digestion prior to measurement. Statistically significant differences in lead concentrations were observed between the various preparation types (p = 0.002; η2 = 0.97). Lead levels in the direct tincture were significantly higher than those in the boiled (p = 0.001), infusion (p = 0.001), decoction (p = 0.009), and dried without skin (p = 0.04) forms. Significant differences in cadmium concentrations were also found (p = 0.006; η2 = 0.94), with lower Cd levels in the decoction compared to the dried with skin (p = 0.009) and without skin (p = 0.001), as well as in the fermented form compared to the dried samples (p = 0.03 and p = 0.004, respectively). These findings demonstrate that the type of preparation significantly influences the levels of cadmium and lead in Amanita muscaria products. While aqueous and fermented preparations showed reduced metal concentrations, none can be considered entirely safe, as even lower levels of Cd and Pb may pose health risks with frequent or excessive consumption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxics
Toxics Chemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信