磷石膏和硼石膏作为可持续和高性能3d打印混凝土的添加剂。

IF 4.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 POLYMER SCIENCE
Polymers Pub Date : 2025-09-19 DOI:10.3390/polym17182530
Yeşim Tarhan, Berrin Atalay
{"title":"磷石膏和硼石膏作为可持续和高性能3d打印混凝土的添加剂。","authors":"Yeşim Tarhan, Berrin Atalay","doi":"10.3390/polym17182530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>3D-printable concretes often require high binder content. This study evaluates the use of industrial gypsum by-products, phosphogypsum (PG) and borogypsum (BG), as partial cement replacements to enhance sustainability without compromising printability. PG and BG were incorporated at 2.5-10 wt% to replace the gypsum fraction in cement-based mortars containing fly ash (FA) or ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), with and without fibers. The fresh properties (spread flow diameter, open time, air content, density, and pH) and compressive strength were measured. At 28 days, the highest strength was achieved with a 7.5% PG addition to the GGBS system (~51 MPa), which exceeded the strength of the GGBS control C1 (~47.6 MPa). In the FA system, 2.5% PG reached 42.5 MPa, comparable to the FA control C2 (41.2 MPa). BG caused pronounced strength penalties at ≥7.5% across both binder systems, indicating a practical BG ceiling of ≤5%. Open time increased from ~0.75 h in the controls to ~2-2.5 h in BG-FA mixes with fibers, whereas PG mixes generally maintained a stable, printable window close to control levels. Overall, adding 5-7.5% PG, particularly in the presence of GGBS, improved mechanical performance without compromising workability. However, BG should be limited to ≤5% unless extended open time is the primary objective. These findings provide quantitative guidance on selecting PG/BG dosages and FA/GGBS systems to balance strength and printability in cement-based, 3D-printable concretes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20416,"journal":{"name":"Polymers","volume":"17 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473474/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phosphogypsum and Borogypsum as Additives for Sustainable and High-Performance 3D-Printable Concrete.\",\"authors\":\"Yeşim Tarhan, Berrin Atalay\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/polym17182530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>3D-printable concretes often require high binder content. This study evaluates the use of industrial gypsum by-products, phosphogypsum (PG) and borogypsum (BG), as partial cement replacements to enhance sustainability without compromising printability. PG and BG were incorporated at 2.5-10 wt% to replace the gypsum fraction in cement-based mortars containing fly ash (FA) or ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), with and without fibers. The fresh properties (spread flow diameter, open time, air content, density, and pH) and compressive strength were measured. At 28 days, the highest strength was achieved with a 7.5% PG addition to the GGBS system (~51 MPa), which exceeded the strength of the GGBS control C1 (~47.6 MPa). In the FA system, 2.5% PG reached 42.5 MPa, comparable to the FA control C2 (41.2 MPa). BG caused pronounced strength penalties at ≥7.5% across both binder systems, indicating a practical BG ceiling of ≤5%. Open time increased from ~0.75 h in the controls to ~2-2.5 h in BG-FA mixes with fibers, whereas PG mixes generally maintained a stable, printable window close to control levels. Overall, adding 5-7.5% PG, particularly in the presence of GGBS, improved mechanical performance without compromising workability. However, BG should be limited to ≤5% unless extended open time is the primary objective. These findings provide quantitative guidance on selecting PG/BG dosages and FA/GGBS systems to balance strength and printability in cement-based, 3D-printable concretes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polymers\",\"volume\":\"17 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473474/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polymers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17182530\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLYMER SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polymers","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17182530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

3d打印混凝土通常需要高粘结剂含量。本研究评估了工业石膏副产品磷石膏(PG)和硼石膏(BG)作为部分水泥替代品的使用,以提高可持续性,同时不影响印刷性。PG和BG以2.5-10 wt%的比例掺入,以取代含有粉煤灰(FA)或磨粒高炉渣(GGBS)的水泥基砂浆中的石膏部分,无论是否含有纤维。测量了新鲜性能(扩散流径、打开时间、空气含量、密度和pH值)和抗压强度。28 d时,添加7.5% PG的GGBS体系强度最高(~51 MPa),超过了GGBS对照C1 (~47.6 MPa)的强度。在FA系统中,2.5% PG达到42.5 MPa,与FA控制C2 (41.2 MPa)相当。在两种粘结剂体系中,BG在≥7.5%时造成明显的强度损失,这表明实际的BG上限≤5%。打开时间从对照组的~0.75 h增加到BG-FA混合纤维的~2-2.5 h,而PG混合纤维通常保持稳定的可打印窗口,接近控制水平。总的来说,添加5-7.5% PG,特别是在GGBS存在的情况下,在不影响和易性的情况下提高了机械性能。然而,BG应限制在≤5%,除非延长打开时间是主要目标。这些发现为选择PG/BG剂量和FA/GGBS系统来平衡水泥基3d打印混凝土的强度和可打印性提供了定量指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phosphogypsum and Borogypsum as Additives for Sustainable and High-Performance 3D-Printable Concrete.

3D-printable concretes often require high binder content. This study evaluates the use of industrial gypsum by-products, phosphogypsum (PG) and borogypsum (BG), as partial cement replacements to enhance sustainability without compromising printability. PG and BG were incorporated at 2.5-10 wt% to replace the gypsum fraction in cement-based mortars containing fly ash (FA) or ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), with and without fibers. The fresh properties (spread flow diameter, open time, air content, density, and pH) and compressive strength were measured. At 28 days, the highest strength was achieved with a 7.5% PG addition to the GGBS system (~51 MPa), which exceeded the strength of the GGBS control C1 (~47.6 MPa). In the FA system, 2.5% PG reached 42.5 MPa, comparable to the FA control C2 (41.2 MPa). BG caused pronounced strength penalties at ≥7.5% across both binder systems, indicating a practical BG ceiling of ≤5%. Open time increased from ~0.75 h in the controls to ~2-2.5 h in BG-FA mixes with fibers, whereas PG mixes generally maintained a stable, printable window close to control levels. Overall, adding 5-7.5% PG, particularly in the presence of GGBS, improved mechanical performance without compromising workability. However, BG should be limited to ≤5% unless extended open time is the primary objective. These findings provide quantitative guidance on selecting PG/BG dosages and FA/GGBS systems to balance strength and printability in cement-based, 3D-printable concretes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polymers
Polymers POLYMER SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
4697
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: Polymers (ISSN 2073-4360) is an international, open access journal of polymer science. It publishes research papers, short communications and review papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Polymers provides an interdisciplinary forum for publishing papers which advance the fields of (i) polymerization methods, (ii) theory, simulation, and modeling, (iii) understanding of new physical phenomena, (iv) advances in characterization techniques, and (v) harnessing of self-assembly and biological strategies for producing complex multifunctional structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信