资源受限物联网平台上轻量级加密算法性能对比分析。

IF 3.5 3区 综合性期刊 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Sensors Pub Date : 2025-09-20 DOI:10.3390/s25185887
Tiberius-George Sorescu, Vlad-Mihai Chiriac, Mario-Alexandru Stoica, Ciprian-Romeo Comsa, Iustin-Gabriel Soroaga, Alexandru Contac
{"title":"资源受限物联网平台上轻量级加密算法性能对比分析。","authors":"Tiberius-George Sorescu, Vlad-Mihai Chiriac, Mario-Alexandru Stoica, Ciprian-Romeo Comsa, Iustin-Gabriel Soroaga, Alexandru Contac","doi":"10.3390/s25185887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increase in Internet of Things (IoT) devices has introduced significant security challenges, primarily due to their inherent constraints in computational power, memory, and energy. This study provides a comparative performance analysis of selected modern cryptographic algorithms on a resource-constrained IoT platform, the Nordic Thingy:53. We evaluated a set of ciphers including the NIST lightweight standard ASCON, eSTREAM finalists Salsa20, Rabbit, Sosemanuk, HC-256, and the extended-nonce variant XChaCha20. Using a dual test-bench methodology, we measured energy consumption and performance under two distinct scenarios: a low-data-rate Bluetooth mesh network and a high-throughput bulk data transfer. The results reveal significant performance variations among the algorithms. In high-throughput tests, ciphers like XChaCha20, Salsa20, and ASCON32 demonstrated superior speed, while HC-256 proved impractically slow for large payloads. The Bluetooth mesh experiments quantified the direct relationship between network activity and power draw, underscoring the critical impact of cryptographic choice on battery life. These findings offer an empirical basis for selecting appropriate cryptographic solutions that balance security, energy efficiency, and performance requirements for real-world IoT applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":21698,"journal":{"name":"Sensors","volume":"25 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Performance Analysis of Lightweight Cryptographic Algorithms on Resource-Constrained IoT Platforms.\",\"authors\":\"Tiberius-George Sorescu, Vlad-Mihai Chiriac, Mario-Alexandru Stoica, Ciprian-Romeo Comsa, Iustin-Gabriel Soroaga, Alexandru Contac\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/s25185887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The increase in Internet of Things (IoT) devices has introduced significant security challenges, primarily due to their inherent constraints in computational power, memory, and energy. This study provides a comparative performance analysis of selected modern cryptographic algorithms on a resource-constrained IoT platform, the Nordic Thingy:53. We evaluated a set of ciphers including the NIST lightweight standard ASCON, eSTREAM finalists Salsa20, Rabbit, Sosemanuk, HC-256, and the extended-nonce variant XChaCha20. Using a dual test-bench methodology, we measured energy consumption and performance under two distinct scenarios: a low-data-rate Bluetooth mesh network and a high-throughput bulk data transfer. The results reveal significant performance variations among the algorithms. In high-throughput tests, ciphers like XChaCha20, Salsa20, and ASCON32 demonstrated superior speed, while HC-256 proved impractically slow for large payloads. The Bluetooth mesh experiments quantified the direct relationship between network activity and power draw, underscoring the critical impact of cryptographic choice on battery life. These findings offer an empirical basis for selecting appropriate cryptographic solutions that balance security, energy efficiency, and performance requirements for real-world IoT applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sensors\",\"volume\":\"25 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473500/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sensors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185887\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物联网(IoT)设备的增加带来了重大的安全挑战,主要是由于它们在计算能力、内存和能源方面的固有限制。本研究在资源受限的物联网平台Nordic Thingy:53上对选定的现代加密算法进行了性能比较分析。我们评估了一组密码,包括NIST轻量级标准ASCON、eSTREAM决赛选手Salsa20、Rabbit、Sosemanuk、HC-256和扩展的nonce变体XChaCha20。使用双测试台方法,我们测量了两种不同场景下的能耗和性能:低数据速率蓝牙网状网络和高吞吐量批量数据传输。结果显示了不同算法之间的显著性能差异。在高吞吐量测试中,像xchachha20、Salsa20和ASCON32这样的密码显示出了更高的速度,而HC-256对于大的有效负载被证明是不实际的慢。蓝牙网格实验量化了网络活动和功耗之间的直接关系,强调了加密选择对电池寿命的关键影响。这些发现为选择合适的加密解决方案提供了经验基础,这些解决方案可以平衡现实世界物联网应用的安全性、能效和性能要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative Performance Analysis of Lightweight Cryptographic Algorithms on Resource-Constrained IoT Platforms.

Comparative Performance Analysis of Lightweight Cryptographic Algorithms on Resource-Constrained IoT Platforms.

Comparative Performance Analysis of Lightweight Cryptographic Algorithms on Resource-Constrained IoT Platforms.

Comparative Performance Analysis of Lightweight Cryptographic Algorithms on Resource-Constrained IoT Platforms.

The increase in Internet of Things (IoT) devices has introduced significant security challenges, primarily due to their inherent constraints in computational power, memory, and energy. This study provides a comparative performance analysis of selected modern cryptographic algorithms on a resource-constrained IoT platform, the Nordic Thingy:53. We evaluated a set of ciphers including the NIST lightweight standard ASCON, eSTREAM finalists Salsa20, Rabbit, Sosemanuk, HC-256, and the extended-nonce variant XChaCha20. Using a dual test-bench methodology, we measured energy consumption and performance under two distinct scenarios: a low-data-rate Bluetooth mesh network and a high-throughput bulk data transfer. The results reveal significant performance variations among the algorithms. In high-throughput tests, ciphers like XChaCha20, Salsa20, and ASCON32 demonstrated superior speed, while HC-256 proved impractically slow for large payloads. The Bluetooth mesh experiments quantified the direct relationship between network activity and power draw, underscoring the critical impact of cryptographic choice on battery life. These findings offer an empirical basis for selecting appropriate cryptographic solutions that balance security, energy efficiency, and performance requirements for real-world IoT applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sensors
Sensors 工程技术-电化学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
8430
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of sensors and biosensors. It publishes reviews (including comprehensive reviews on the complete sensors products), regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信