反刍动物和马胃肠道线虫对主要种类驱虫药耐药性的独立发展。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Jacques Cabaret
{"title":"反刍动物和马胃肠道线虫对主要种类驱虫药耐药性的独立发展。","authors":"Jacques Cabaret","doi":"10.3390/pathogens14090898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resistance to anthelmintics in gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) is highly prevalent, as these parasites have been treated with anthelmintics for decades in ruminants and horses. Anthelmintics belong to different classes, each with a different mode of action. The most used are benzimidazoles and macrocyclic lactones and, to a lesser extent, levamisole and pyrantel in herbivores, as estimated from the literature. Combining these classes should be effective in controlling GIN. However, several farmers' practices tend to promote GIN resistance. Therefore, it is unclear whether the use of anthelmintic associations is a sustainable solution for controlling resistance in natural conditions. It is not easy to establish the association of anthelmintic resistances on farms since rarely several anthelmintics and their combinations are used on a single farm. Composed probability calculations were employed when literature data indicated the presence of resistance (to benzimidazoles, levamisole, or macrocyclic lactones) in several ruminant GIN cases. The efficacy of different anthelmintics (benzimidazoles, pyrantel, or macrocyclic lactones) was evaluated in terms of the correlation between faecal nematode egg counts in horses in the available literature. No associations of anthelmintic resistance were found between the different classes of anthelmintics in either ruminants or horses. However, the association between anthelmintic resistance in GIN may appear in the long term. It is presumed that combining drugs may reduce the development of resistance and allow better control of infection on farms where resistance is already established to a low level.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Independent Development of Resistance to Main Classes of Anthelmintics by Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Ruminants and Horses.\",\"authors\":\"Jacques Cabaret\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pathogens14090898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Resistance to anthelmintics in gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) is highly prevalent, as these parasites have been treated with anthelmintics for decades in ruminants and horses. Anthelmintics belong to different classes, each with a different mode of action. The most used are benzimidazoles and macrocyclic lactones and, to a lesser extent, levamisole and pyrantel in herbivores, as estimated from the literature. Combining these classes should be effective in controlling GIN. However, several farmers' practices tend to promote GIN resistance. Therefore, it is unclear whether the use of anthelmintic associations is a sustainable solution for controlling resistance in natural conditions. It is not easy to establish the association of anthelmintic resistances on farms since rarely several anthelmintics and their combinations are used on a single farm. Composed probability calculations were employed when literature data indicated the presence of resistance (to benzimidazoles, levamisole, or macrocyclic lactones) in several ruminant GIN cases. The efficacy of different anthelmintics (benzimidazoles, pyrantel, or macrocyclic lactones) was evaluated in terms of the correlation between faecal nematode egg counts in horses in the available literature. No associations of anthelmintic resistance were found between the different classes of anthelmintics in either ruminants or horses. However, the association between anthelmintic resistance in GIN may appear in the long term. It is presumed that combining drugs may reduce the development of resistance and allow better control of infection on farms where resistance is already established to a low level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathogens\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473072/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathogens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090898\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090898","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胃肠道线虫(GINs)对驱虫药的耐药性非常普遍,因为这些寄生虫已经在反刍动物和马身上用驱虫药治疗了几十年。驱虫药属于不同的类别,每种都有不同的作用方式。据文献估计,在食草动物中使用最多的是苯并咪唑和大环内酯,其次是左旋咪唑和吡喃酮。将这些类结合起来应该可以有效地控制GIN。然而,一些农民的做法往往会促进对GIN的抵制。因此,目前尚不清楚在自然条件下使用驱虫虫群是否是控制抗性的可持续解决方案。由于很少在一个农场上使用几种驱虫剂及其组合,因此在农场上建立驱虫剂耐药性的关联并不容易。当文献资料显示在几个反刍动物GIN病例中存在耐药性(对苯并咪唑、左旋咪唑或大环内酯)时,采用组合概率计算。在现有文献中,根据马粪便线虫卵数之间的相关性,评估了不同驱虫药(苯并咪唑、吡喃酮或大环内酯)的功效。在反刍动物和马的不同种类的驱虫药之间没有发现抗虫性的关联。然而,在GIN中,虫虫耐药性之间的关联可能会长期出现。据推测,联合用药可能会减少耐药性的产生,并能更好地控制已经形成低耐药性的农场的感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Independent Development of Resistance to Main Classes of Anthelmintics by Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Ruminants and Horses.

Resistance to anthelmintics in gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) is highly prevalent, as these parasites have been treated with anthelmintics for decades in ruminants and horses. Anthelmintics belong to different classes, each with a different mode of action. The most used are benzimidazoles and macrocyclic lactones and, to a lesser extent, levamisole and pyrantel in herbivores, as estimated from the literature. Combining these classes should be effective in controlling GIN. However, several farmers' practices tend to promote GIN resistance. Therefore, it is unclear whether the use of anthelmintic associations is a sustainable solution for controlling resistance in natural conditions. It is not easy to establish the association of anthelmintic resistances on farms since rarely several anthelmintics and their combinations are used on a single farm. Composed probability calculations were employed when literature data indicated the presence of resistance (to benzimidazoles, levamisole, or macrocyclic lactones) in several ruminant GIN cases. The efficacy of different anthelmintics (benzimidazoles, pyrantel, or macrocyclic lactones) was evaluated in terms of the correlation between faecal nematode egg counts in horses in the available literature. No associations of anthelmintic resistance were found between the different classes of anthelmintics in either ruminants or horses. However, the association between anthelmintic resistance in GIN may appear in the long term. It is presumed that combining drugs may reduce the development of resistance and allow better control of infection on farms where resistance is already established to a low level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信