澳大利亚医疗事务专业人员能力框架的发展。

IF 4.5 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Andrew Weekes, Matthew Britland, Cathey Saha, Simon McErlane, Niloufar Ansari, Daniel Thurley, Victoria Elegant, Orin Chisholm
{"title":"澳大利亚医疗事务专业人员能力框架的发展。","authors":"Andrew Weekes, Matthew Britland, Cathey Saha, Simon McErlane, Niloufar Ansari, Daniel Thurley, Victoria Elegant, Orin Chisholm","doi":"10.1007/s40290-025-00585-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Medical Affairs (MA) plays a critical role in bridging the gap between research, clinical practice and business strategy. With the rapid growth in this field, it is essential to have a competency framework to support individuals' professional development. A well-defined competency framework will not only empower MA professionals to excel and develop in their roles but also contribute to better patient outcomes and improved stakeholder engagement. This paper discusses the development of a competency framework for Medical Affairs professionals in Australasia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MA competency framework was developed using an iterative method by a team of MA professionals across Australia through a series of workshops and surveys over 2 years with the cooperation of the local MA community. The core development team debated and finessed the final framework over this time via meetings and discussions to arrive at the draft framework. This was pilot tested by a local pharmaceutical organisation and feedback informed some minor changes to the final framework. This was then endorsed by the Medical Affairs of Australasia (MAPA) Executive Committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The framework consists of six domains: Scientific/Technical Knowledge, Evidence Generation, Compliance, Governance and Ethics, Leadership/Professionalism, Communication and Collaboration and Business Acumen, each with specific competencies and across four clearly defined levels from novice to expert.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This framework has been endorsed by the Medical Affairs Professionals of Australasia Executive Committee and provides a clear framework for the professional development of medical affairs professionals across our region. It is also applicable to MA professionals more broadly.</p>","PeriodicalId":19778,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Competency Framework for Medical Affairs Professionals in Australasia.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Weekes, Matthew Britland, Cathey Saha, Simon McErlane, Niloufar Ansari, Daniel Thurley, Victoria Elegant, Orin Chisholm\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40290-025-00585-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Medical Affairs (MA) plays a critical role in bridging the gap between research, clinical practice and business strategy. With the rapid growth in this field, it is essential to have a competency framework to support individuals' professional development. A well-defined competency framework will not only empower MA professionals to excel and develop in their roles but also contribute to better patient outcomes and improved stakeholder engagement. This paper discusses the development of a competency framework for Medical Affairs professionals in Australasia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MA competency framework was developed using an iterative method by a team of MA professionals across Australia through a series of workshops and surveys over 2 years with the cooperation of the local MA community. The core development team debated and finessed the final framework over this time via meetings and discussions to arrive at the draft framework. This was pilot tested by a local pharmaceutical organisation and feedback informed some minor changes to the final framework. This was then endorsed by the Medical Affairs of Australasia (MAPA) Executive Committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The framework consists of six domains: Scientific/Technical Knowledge, Evidence Generation, Compliance, Governance and Ethics, Leadership/Professionalism, Communication and Collaboration and Business Acumen, each with specific competencies and across four clearly defined levels from novice to expert.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This framework has been endorsed by the Medical Affairs Professionals of Australasia Executive Committee and provides a clear framework for the professional development of medical affairs professionals across our region. It is also applicable to MA professionals more broadly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-025-00585-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-025-00585-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:医学事务(MA)在弥合研究,临床实践和商业战略之间的差距方面发挥着关键作用。随着该领域的快速发展,有一个能力框架来支持个人的专业发展是至关重要的。良好定义的胜任力框架不仅可以使MA专业人员在他们的角色中脱颖而出和发展,还有助于改善患者的治疗效果和提高利益相关者的参与度。本文讨论了澳大利亚医疗事务专业人员能力框架的发展。方法:MA能力框架是由澳大利亚的MA专业团队在当地MA社区的合作下,通过两年多的一系列研讨会和调查,使用迭代方法开发的。在这段时间里,核心开发团队通过会议和讨论对最终框架进行了辩论和改进,最终形成了框架草案。这是由当地一家制药组织进行的试点测试,反馈通知了对最终框架的一些小改动。这随后得到了澳大拉西亚医疗事务执行委员会的认可。结果:该框架由六个领域组成:科学/技术知识、证据生成、合规、治理和道德、领导力/专业精神、沟通和协作以及商业头脑,每个领域都有特定的能力,并跨越从新手到专家的四个明确定义的级别。结论:该框架已得到澳大拉西亚医疗事务专业人员执行委员会的认可,并为本地区医疗事务专业人员的专业发展提供了明确的框架。它也适用于更广泛的硕士专业人士。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Competency Framework for Medical Affairs Professionals in Australasia.

Background and objectives: Medical Affairs (MA) plays a critical role in bridging the gap between research, clinical practice and business strategy. With the rapid growth in this field, it is essential to have a competency framework to support individuals' professional development. A well-defined competency framework will not only empower MA professionals to excel and develop in their roles but also contribute to better patient outcomes and improved stakeholder engagement. This paper discusses the development of a competency framework for Medical Affairs professionals in Australasia.

Methods: The MA competency framework was developed using an iterative method by a team of MA professionals across Australia through a series of workshops and surveys over 2 years with the cooperation of the local MA community. The core development team debated and finessed the final framework over this time via meetings and discussions to arrive at the draft framework. This was pilot tested by a local pharmaceutical organisation and feedback informed some minor changes to the final framework. This was then endorsed by the Medical Affairs of Australasia (MAPA) Executive Committee.

Results: The framework consists of six domains: Scientific/Technical Knowledge, Evidence Generation, Compliance, Governance and Ethics, Leadership/Professionalism, Communication and Collaboration and Business Acumen, each with specific competencies and across four clearly defined levels from novice to expert.

Conclusion: This framework has been endorsed by the Medical Affairs Professionals of Australasia Executive Committee and provides a clear framework for the professional development of medical affairs professionals across our region. It is also applicable to MA professionals more broadly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Medicine
Pharmaceutical Medicine PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Medicine is a specialist discipline concerned with medical aspects of the discovery, development, evaluation, registration, regulation, monitoring, marketing, distribution and pricing of medicines, drug-device and drug-diagnostic combinations. The Journal disseminates information to support the community of professionals working in these highly inter-related functions. Key areas include translational medicine, clinical trial design, pharmacovigilance, clinical toxicology, drug regulation, clinical pharmacology, biostatistics and pharmacoeconomics. The Journal includes:Overviews of contentious or emerging issues.Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on topical issues.Systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by PRISMA statement.Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to wider areas of clinical research.Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Pharmaceutical Medicine may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信