COVID-19大流行期间缅因州COVID-19传播潜力和非药物干预措施

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Ina Sze-Ting Lee, Sylvia K Ofori, Doyinsola A Babatunde, Emmanuel A Akowuah, Kin On Kwok, Gerardo Chowell, Isaac Chun-Hai Fung
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间缅因州COVID-19传播潜力和非药物干预措施","authors":"Ina Sze-Ting Lee, Sylvia K Ofori, Doyinsola A Babatunde, Emmanuel A Akowuah, Kin On Kwok, Gerardo Chowell, Isaac Chun-Hai Fung","doi":"10.3390/pathogens14090893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aimed to evaluate regional variation in SARS-CoV-2 transmission and assess associations between public health interventions and the time-varying reproduction number (Rt) across Maine from January 2020 to February 2023. Daily confirmed COVID-19 case counts were adjusted for reporting anomalies and delays using deconvolution. Infection counts were estimated by applying a Poisson-distributed multiplier of 4 to account for underreporting. Rt was estimated using <i>EpiEstim</i> with a 7-day sliding window from January 2020 through February 2023. The analysis of associations between Rt and public health interventions was limited to 2020, concluding just before COVID-19 vaccines became available in Maine in December 2020. <i>EpiEstim</i> was parameterized with an Omicron-specific serial interval distribution (main analysis) and an early-pandemic serial interval distribution (sensitivity analysis). Maine experienced four major COVID-19 waves. Rt values fluctuated but remained close to 1 at both the statewide and district levels. No statistically significant changes in Rt were observed in association with any interventions implemented in 2020. Our findings underscore the challenges of quantifying intervention impacts in rural settings, where low incidence and sparse data can obscure the effects of interventions. This highlights the need for enhanced surveillance tools tailored to the unique constraints of rural public health contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 Transmission Potential and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions in Maine During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Ina Sze-Ting Lee, Sylvia K Ofori, Doyinsola A Babatunde, Emmanuel A Akowuah, Kin On Kwok, Gerardo Chowell, Isaac Chun-Hai Fung\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pathogens14090893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study aimed to evaluate regional variation in SARS-CoV-2 transmission and assess associations between public health interventions and the time-varying reproduction number (Rt) across Maine from January 2020 to February 2023. Daily confirmed COVID-19 case counts were adjusted for reporting anomalies and delays using deconvolution. Infection counts were estimated by applying a Poisson-distributed multiplier of 4 to account for underreporting. Rt was estimated using <i>EpiEstim</i> with a 7-day sliding window from January 2020 through February 2023. The analysis of associations between Rt and public health interventions was limited to 2020, concluding just before COVID-19 vaccines became available in Maine in December 2020. <i>EpiEstim</i> was parameterized with an Omicron-specific serial interval distribution (main analysis) and an early-pandemic serial interval distribution (sensitivity analysis). Maine experienced four major COVID-19 waves. Rt values fluctuated but remained close to 1 at both the statewide and district levels. No statistically significant changes in Rt were observed in association with any interventions implemented in 2020. Our findings underscore the challenges of quantifying intervention impacts in rural settings, where low incidence and sparse data can obscure the effects of interventions. This highlights the need for enhanced surveillance tools tailored to the unique constraints of rural public health contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathogens\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472373/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathogens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090893\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究旨在评估2020年1月至2023年2月缅因州SARS-CoV-2传播的区域差异,并评估公共卫生干预措施与时变繁殖数(Rt)之间的关系。每日确诊的COVID-19病例数使用反卷积进行调整,以报告异常和延误。感染计数通过应用泊松分布乘数4来估计,以解释漏报。从2020年1月到2023年2月,使用EpiEstim进行7天滑动窗口估计Rt。对Rt与公共卫生干预措施之间关系的分析仅限于2020年,该分析是在2020年12月缅因州推出COVID-19疫苗之前得出的。EpiEstim参数化为omicron特异性序列间隔分布(主要分析)和大流行早期序列间隔分布(敏感性分析)。缅因州经历了四次主要的COVID-19浪潮。Rt值有所波动,但在全州和地区水平上都接近于1。未观察到与2020年实施的任何干预措施相关的Rt有统计学意义的变化。我们的研究结果强调了在农村环境中量化干预影响的挑战,在农村,低发病率和稀疏的数据可能会掩盖干预的效果。这突出表明需要加强监测工具,使其适应农村公共卫生环境的独特限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 Transmission Potential and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions in Maine During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The study aimed to evaluate regional variation in SARS-CoV-2 transmission and assess associations between public health interventions and the time-varying reproduction number (Rt) across Maine from January 2020 to February 2023. Daily confirmed COVID-19 case counts were adjusted for reporting anomalies and delays using deconvolution. Infection counts were estimated by applying a Poisson-distributed multiplier of 4 to account for underreporting. Rt was estimated using EpiEstim with a 7-day sliding window from January 2020 through February 2023. The analysis of associations between Rt and public health interventions was limited to 2020, concluding just before COVID-19 vaccines became available in Maine in December 2020. EpiEstim was parameterized with an Omicron-specific serial interval distribution (main analysis) and an early-pandemic serial interval distribution (sensitivity analysis). Maine experienced four major COVID-19 waves. Rt values fluctuated but remained close to 1 at both the statewide and district levels. No statistically significant changes in Rt were observed in association with any interventions implemented in 2020. Our findings underscore the challenges of quantifying intervention impacts in rural settings, where low incidence and sparse data can obscure the effects of interventions. This highlights the need for enhanced surveillance tools tailored to the unique constraints of rural public health contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信