尼日利亚南部非洲猪瘟的主动监测和养殖场风险评估。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Alhaji S Olono, Olusola A Ogunsanya, Ayotunde E Sijuwola, Femi M Saibu, Oluwatobi Adedokun, Akeemat O Ayinla, John Fadele, Harouna Soumare, Eugenie Y Tchokote, John O Abiola, Bonto Faburay, Corrie Brown, Christian T Happi, Anise N Happi
{"title":"尼日利亚南部非洲猪瘟的主动监测和养殖场风险评估。","authors":"Alhaji S Olono, Olusola A Ogunsanya, Ayotunde E Sijuwola, Femi M Saibu, Oluwatobi Adedokun, Akeemat O Ayinla, John Fadele, Harouna Soumare, Eugenie Y Tchokote, John O Abiola, Bonto Faburay, Corrie Brown, Christian T Happi, Anise N Happi","doi":"10.3390/pathogens14090934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pig farms in Southern Nigeria face recurrent threats from enzootic viral infections, yet active surveillance remains limited. This study implemented an active surveillance approach targeting African swine fever virus (ASFV) to assess its circulation across four states. We sampled 40 pig farms and two abattoirs, collecting swine blood and ticks for molecular and serological analysis. Sampling was conducted during both African swine fever (ASF) outbreak (<i>n</i> = 27 pigs) and non-outbreak (<i>n</i> = 204 pigs) periods, resulting in 231 samples tested for ASFV DNA. Additionally, 46 plasma samples from the non-outbreak period were screened for ASFV-specific antibodies. ASFV was detected in all pigs sampled during outbreak periods (27/27; 100%), whereas none of the pigs sampled during non-outbreak periods tested positive (0/204). Of the 27 positives, sequencing generated 7 genomes characterized as genotype II. Serological testing of the 46 plasma samples from non-outbreak pigs revealed no ASFV seropositivity. All tick samples were negative for ASFV DNA. Farm-level risk evaluations revealed widespread biosecurity lapses, suggesting these deficiencies as potential drivers of ASFV circulation. These findings underscore the urgent need to strengthen farm-level biosecurity and demonstrate the pivotal role of active surveillance and genome sequencing in detecting and characterizing ASF outbreaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Active Surveillance and Farm-Level Risk Evaluation of African Swine Fever in Southern Nigeria.\",\"authors\":\"Alhaji S Olono, Olusola A Ogunsanya, Ayotunde E Sijuwola, Femi M Saibu, Oluwatobi Adedokun, Akeemat O Ayinla, John Fadele, Harouna Soumare, Eugenie Y Tchokote, John O Abiola, Bonto Faburay, Corrie Brown, Christian T Happi, Anise N Happi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pathogens14090934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pig farms in Southern Nigeria face recurrent threats from enzootic viral infections, yet active surveillance remains limited. This study implemented an active surveillance approach targeting African swine fever virus (ASFV) to assess its circulation across four states. We sampled 40 pig farms and two abattoirs, collecting swine blood and ticks for molecular and serological analysis. Sampling was conducted during both African swine fever (ASF) outbreak (<i>n</i> = 27 pigs) and non-outbreak (<i>n</i> = 204 pigs) periods, resulting in 231 samples tested for ASFV DNA. Additionally, 46 plasma samples from the non-outbreak period were screened for ASFV-specific antibodies. ASFV was detected in all pigs sampled during outbreak periods (27/27; 100%), whereas none of the pigs sampled during non-outbreak periods tested positive (0/204). Of the 27 positives, sequencing generated 7 genomes characterized as genotype II. Serological testing of the 46 plasma samples from non-outbreak pigs revealed no ASFV seropositivity. All tick samples were negative for ASFV DNA. Farm-level risk evaluations revealed widespread biosecurity lapses, suggesting these deficiencies as potential drivers of ASFV circulation. These findings underscore the urgent need to strengthen farm-level biosecurity and demonstrate the pivotal role of active surveillance and genome sequencing in detecting and characterizing ASF outbreaks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathogens\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472251/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathogens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090934\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090934","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尼日利亚南部的养猪场经常面临地方性流行性病毒感染的威胁,但积极的监测仍然有限。本研究实施了针对非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)的主动监测方法,以评估其在四个州的传播情况。我们对40个猪场和2个屠宰场进行采样,采集猪血和蜱进行分子和血清学分析。在非洲猪瘟暴发(n = 27头猪)和非暴发(n = 204头猪)期间进行了采样,对231份样本进行了ASFV DNA检测。此外,对非暴发时期的46份血浆样本进行了非洲猪瘟病毒特异性抗体筛查。在疫情期间取样的所有猪中均检测到非洲猪瘟病毒(27/27;100%),而在非疫情期间取样的猪均未检测出阳性(0/204)。在27个阳性基因中,测序产生了7个基因型为II型的基因组。对未暴发猪的46个血浆样本进行血清学检测未发现非洲猪瘟病毒血清阳性。所有蜱虫样本均呈非洲猪瘟病毒DNA阴性。农场层面的风险评估揭示了广泛存在的生物安全漏洞,表明这些缺陷是非洲猪瘟传播的潜在驱动因素。这些发现强调了加强农场层面生物安全的迫切需要,并证明了主动监测和基因组测序在发现和表征非洲猪瘟暴发方面的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Active Surveillance and Farm-Level Risk Evaluation of African Swine Fever in Southern Nigeria.

Pig farms in Southern Nigeria face recurrent threats from enzootic viral infections, yet active surveillance remains limited. This study implemented an active surveillance approach targeting African swine fever virus (ASFV) to assess its circulation across four states. We sampled 40 pig farms and two abattoirs, collecting swine blood and ticks for molecular and serological analysis. Sampling was conducted during both African swine fever (ASF) outbreak (n = 27 pigs) and non-outbreak (n = 204 pigs) periods, resulting in 231 samples tested for ASFV DNA. Additionally, 46 plasma samples from the non-outbreak period were screened for ASFV-specific antibodies. ASFV was detected in all pigs sampled during outbreak periods (27/27; 100%), whereas none of the pigs sampled during non-outbreak periods tested positive (0/204). Of the 27 positives, sequencing generated 7 genomes characterized as genotype II. Serological testing of the 46 plasma samples from non-outbreak pigs revealed no ASFV seropositivity. All tick samples were negative for ASFV DNA. Farm-level risk evaluations revealed widespread biosecurity lapses, suggesting these deficiencies as potential drivers of ASFV circulation. These findings underscore the urgent need to strengthen farm-level biosecurity and demonstrate the pivotal role of active surveillance and genome sequencing in detecting and characterizing ASF outbreaks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信