表征金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌在双种植入物相关生物膜中的相互作用。

IF 9.2 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Amita Sekar, Fawaz Ben Malick, Shweta Uma Deepak, Nicoletta Inverardi, Dillon Murugesan, Orhun K Muratoglu, Ebru Oral
{"title":"表征金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌在双种植入物相关生物膜中的相互作用。","authors":"Amita Sekar, Fawaz Ben Malick, Shweta Uma Deepak, Nicoletta Inverardi, Dillon Murugesan, Orhun K Muratoglu, Ebru Oral","doi":"10.1038/s41522-025-00754-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While Staphylococcus aureus is the predominant pathogen in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), polymicrobial infections involving Gram-negative organisms, such as Escherichia coli, complicate clinical outcomes. Little is known regarding implant-associated polymicrobial interactions; consequently, current PJI treatments are not optimized for their treatment. This study explored the dynamics of S. aureus-E. coli dual-species biofilms, focusing on biofilm properties, antibiotic susceptibility, and molecular interactions. Co-culture experiments revealed that E. coli significantly suppressed S. aureus biofilm viability, observed for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Microscopic analyses demonstrated enhanced E. coli attachment facilitated by S. aureus matrix proteins; however, over time, E. coli dominated the biofilm composition. In the presence of E. coli, MSSA biofilm exhibited improved gentamicin susceptibility while MRSA showed limited change, underscoring strain-specific interactions. Notably, E. coli biofilms exhibited enhanced resistance to gentamicin in dual-species settings. Gene expression profiling revealed molecular adaptation in S. aureus and E. coli, triggered by the differential regulation of stress, adhesion, virulence, and biofilm-associated genes within a dual-species implant-associated biofilm. The suppression of S. aureus by E. coli presents potential therapeutic avenues, and in vivo studies and mechanistic investigations are crucial for optimizing treatment strategies targeting polymicrobial PJIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19370,"journal":{"name":"npj Biofilms and Microbiomes","volume":"11 1","pages":"189"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12475442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing interactions of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in dual-species implant-associated biofilms.\",\"authors\":\"Amita Sekar, Fawaz Ben Malick, Shweta Uma Deepak, Nicoletta Inverardi, Dillon Murugesan, Orhun K Muratoglu, Ebru Oral\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41522-025-00754-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While Staphylococcus aureus is the predominant pathogen in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), polymicrobial infections involving Gram-negative organisms, such as Escherichia coli, complicate clinical outcomes. Little is known regarding implant-associated polymicrobial interactions; consequently, current PJI treatments are not optimized for their treatment. This study explored the dynamics of S. aureus-E. coli dual-species biofilms, focusing on biofilm properties, antibiotic susceptibility, and molecular interactions. Co-culture experiments revealed that E. coli significantly suppressed S. aureus biofilm viability, observed for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Microscopic analyses demonstrated enhanced E. coli attachment facilitated by S. aureus matrix proteins; however, over time, E. coli dominated the biofilm composition. In the presence of E. coli, MSSA biofilm exhibited improved gentamicin susceptibility while MRSA showed limited change, underscoring strain-specific interactions. Notably, E. coli biofilms exhibited enhanced resistance to gentamicin in dual-species settings. Gene expression profiling revealed molecular adaptation in S. aureus and E. coli, triggered by the differential regulation of stress, adhesion, virulence, and biofilm-associated genes within a dual-species implant-associated biofilm. The suppression of S. aureus by E. coli presents potential therapeutic avenues, and in vivo studies and mechanistic investigations are crucial for optimizing treatment strategies targeting polymicrobial PJIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"npj Biofilms and Microbiomes\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12475442/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"npj Biofilms and Microbiomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-025-00754-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Biofilms and Microbiomes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-025-00754-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然金黄色葡萄球菌是假体周围关节感染(PJI)的主要病原体,但涉及革兰氏阴性菌(如大肠杆菌)的多微生物感染使临床结果复杂化。关于植入物相关的多微生物相互作用知之甚少;因此,目前的PJI治疗方法并没有针对其治疗进行优化。本研究探讨了金黄色葡萄球菌的动力学。大肠杆菌双物种生物膜,重点研究生物膜特性、抗生素敏感性和分子相互作用。共培养实验发现,大肠杆菌对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的生物膜活性均有显著抑制作用。显微镜分析表明,金黄色葡萄球菌基质蛋白促进了大肠杆菌的附着;然而,随着时间的推移,大肠杆菌主导了生物膜的组成。在大肠杆菌存在的情况下,MSSA生物膜表现出对庆大霉素的敏感性,而MRSA则表现出有限的变化,强调菌株特异性相互作用。值得注意的是,大肠杆菌生物膜在双物种环境下对庆大霉素的耐药性增强。基因表达谱揭示了金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的分子适应性,这是由两种植入物相关生物膜中应激、粘附、毒力和生物膜相关基因的差异调控引发的。大肠杆菌对金黄色葡萄球菌的抑制提供了潜在的治疗途径,体内研究和机制研究对于优化针对多微生物PJIs的治疗策略至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Characterizing interactions of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in dual-species implant-associated biofilms.

Characterizing interactions of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in dual-species implant-associated biofilms.

Characterizing interactions of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in dual-species implant-associated biofilms.

Characterizing interactions of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in dual-species implant-associated biofilms.

While Staphylococcus aureus is the predominant pathogen in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), polymicrobial infections involving Gram-negative organisms, such as Escherichia coli, complicate clinical outcomes. Little is known regarding implant-associated polymicrobial interactions; consequently, current PJI treatments are not optimized for their treatment. This study explored the dynamics of S. aureus-E. coli dual-species biofilms, focusing on biofilm properties, antibiotic susceptibility, and molecular interactions. Co-culture experiments revealed that E. coli significantly suppressed S. aureus biofilm viability, observed for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Microscopic analyses demonstrated enhanced E. coli attachment facilitated by S. aureus matrix proteins; however, over time, E. coli dominated the biofilm composition. In the presence of E. coli, MSSA biofilm exhibited improved gentamicin susceptibility while MRSA showed limited change, underscoring strain-specific interactions. Notably, E. coli biofilms exhibited enhanced resistance to gentamicin in dual-species settings. Gene expression profiling revealed molecular adaptation in S. aureus and E. coli, triggered by the differential regulation of stress, adhesion, virulence, and biofilm-associated genes within a dual-species implant-associated biofilm. The suppression of S. aureus by E. coli presents potential therapeutic avenues, and in vivo studies and mechanistic investigations are crucial for optimizing treatment strategies targeting polymicrobial PJIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Biofilms and Microbiomes is a comprehensive platform that promotes research on biofilms and microbiomes across various scientific disciplines. The journal facilitates cross-disciplinary discussions to enhance our understanding of the biology, ecology, and communal functions of biofilms, populations, and communities. It also focuses on applications in the medical, environmental, and engineering domains. The scope of the journal encompasses all aspects of the field, ranging from cell-cell communication and single cell interactions to the microbiomes of humans, animals, plants, and natural and built environments. The journal also welcomes research on the virome, phageome, mycome, and fungome. It publishes both applied science and theoretical work. As an open access and interdisciplinary journal, its primary goal is to publish significant scientific advancements in microbial biofilms and microbiomes. The journal enables discussions that span multiple disciplines and contributes to our understanding of the social behavior of microbial biofilm populations and communities, and their impact on life, human health, and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信