3级神经内分泌肿瘤患者全身治疗疗效的多中心回顾性研究(JOSC-2001)。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Hiroyuki Okuyama, Taro Shibuki, Naohiro Okano, Takuro Mizukami, Hiroaki Yanagimoto, Mao Okada, Emiri Kita, Noritoshi Kobayashi, Satoshi Kobayashi, Takaaki Furukawa, Hiroyuki Asama, Hidetaka Tsumura, Ken Kamata, Kumiko Umemoto, Yasuo Hamamoto, Yuko Suzuki, Shigeru Horiguchi, Atsushi Naganuma, Akinori Asagi, Kunihiro Tsuji, Ryoji Takada, Kazuhito Kawata, Motohiro Kojima, Hiroshi Imaoka, Takeshi Terashima, Masato Ozaka, Makoto Ueno, Masafumi Ikeda
{"title":"3级神经内分泌肿瘤患者全身治疗疗效的多中心回顾性研究(JOSC-2001)。","authors":"Hiroyuki Okuyama, Taro Shibuki, Naohiro Okano, Takuro Mizukami, Hiroaki Yanagimoto, Mao Okada, Emiri Kita, Noritoshi Kobayashi, Satoshi Kobayashi, Takaaki Furukawa, Hiroyuki Asama, Hidetaka Tsumura, Ken Kamata, Kumiko Umemoto, Yasuo Hamamoto, Yuko Suzuki, Shigeru Horiguchi, Atsushi Naganuma, Akinori Asagi, Kunihiro Tsuji, Ryoji Takada, Kazuhito Kawata, Motohiro Kojima, Hiroshi Imaoka, Takeshi Terashima, Masato Ozaka, Makoto Ueno, Masafumi Ikeda","doi":"10.1159/000548614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuroendocrine tumor G3 (NET G3) is a new category introduced in the WHO 2017 classification. Accordingly, evidence regarding chemotherapy for NET G3 is limited. A multicenter, retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the outcomes of systemic therapy for NET G3 and to identify the optimal regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient demographic and treatment outcome data were retrospectively collected for 73 patients with pathologically diagnosed NET G3 who started chemotherapy at participating institutions between January 2011 and December 2019, excluding those who were ineligible by central pathological review. The chemotherapy regimens used and their efficacies were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 73 patients, 47 had pancreatic NETs, 10 had gastrointestinal NETs, and 16 had NETs at other sites. Central pathological review was performed for 44 patients, with a concordance rate of 95%. Initial treatment regimens included NET-based treatment (somatostatin analogue, molecular-targeted agent, cytotoxic chemotherapy such as streptozocin and temozolomide) for 37 patients, NEC-based treatment (platinum-containing chemotherapy) for 32 patients, and other regimens for 2 patients. There were no significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS) between patients receiving NET-based and NEC-based treatment, or among the individual treatment regimens. However, the response rate (RR) was higher for NET-based cytotoxic chemotherapy (50%) compared with NEC-based treatment (16%), suggesting greater efficacy of NET-based cytotoxic chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although no significant difference in PFS or OS was found among the chemotherapy regimens for NET G3, RR was notably higher for NET-based cytotoxic chemotherapy than for NEC-based treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19117,"journal":{"name":"Neuroendocrinology","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter Retrospective Study of Efficacy of Systemic Therapy in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumor Grade 3 (JOSC-2001).\",\"authors\":\"Hiroyuki Okuyama, Taro Shibuki, Naohiro Okano, Takuro Mizukami, Hiroaki Yanagimoto, Mao Okada, Emiri Kita, Noritoshi Kobayashi, Satoshi Kobayashi, Takaaki Furukawa, Hiroyuki Asama, Hidetaka Tsumura, Ken Kamata, Kumiko Umemoto, Yasuo Hamamoto, Yuko Suzuki, Shigeru Horiguchi, Atsushi Naganuma, Akinori Asagi, Kunihiro Tsuji, Ryoji Takada, Kazuhito Kawata, Motohiro Kojima, Hiroshi Imaoka, Takeshi Terashima, Masato Ozaka, Makoto Ueno, Masafumi Ikeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000548614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuroendocrine tumor G3 (NET G3) is a new category introduced in the WHO 2017 classification. Accordingly, evidence regarding chemotherapy for NET G3 is limited. A multicenter, retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the outcomes of systemic therapy for NET G3 and to identify the optimal regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient demographic and treatment outcome data were retrospectively collected for 73 patients with pathologically diagnosed NET G3 who started chemotherapy at participating institutions between January 2011 and December 2019, excluding those who were ineligible by central pathological review. The chemotherapy regimens used and their efficacies were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 73 patients, 47 had pancreatic NETs, 10 had gastrointestinal NETs, and 16 had NETs at other sites. Central pathological review was performed for 44 patients, with a concordance rate of 95%. Initial treatment regimens included NET-based treatment (somatostatin analogue, molecular-targeted agent, cytotoxic chemotherapy such as streptozocin and temozolomide) for 37 patients, NEC-based treatment (platinum-containing chemotherapy) for 32 patients, and other regimens for 2 patients. There were no significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS) between patients receiving NET-based and NEC-based treatment, or among the individual treatment regimens. However, the response rate (RR) was higher for NET-based cytotoxic chemotherapy (50%) compared with NEC-based treatment (16%), suggesting greater efficacy of NET-based cytotoxic chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although no significant difference in PFS or OS was found among the chemotherapy regimens for NET G3, RR was notably higher for NET-based cytotoxic chemotherapy than for NEC-based treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroendocrinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroendocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548614\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548614","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经内分泌肿瘤G3 (NET G3)是WHO 2017年分类中引入的一个新类别。因此,关于NET G3的化疗证据有限。采用多中心回顾性分析来评估NET G3全身治疗的结果,并确定最佳方案。方法:回顾性收集2011年1月至2019年12月在参与机构开始化疗的73例病理诊断为NET G3的患者的患者人口统计学和治疗结果数据,不包括中心病理检查不合格的患者。对所采用的化疗方案及其疗效进行评价。结果:73例患者中,47例为胰腺NETs, 10例为胃肠道NETs, 16例为其他部位NETs。44例患者行中央病理复查,符合率95%。初始治疗方案包括37例以net为基础的治疗(生长抑素类似物、分子靶向药物、细胞毒性化疗如链脲佐菌素和替莫唑胺),32例以nec为基础的治疗(含铂化疗),2例其他方案。在接受net和nec治疗的患者之间,或在个别治疗方案之间,无进展生存期(PFS)或总生存期(OS)没有显著差异。然而,基于net的细胞毒性化疗的缓解率(RR)(50%)高于基于nec的治疗(16%),表明基于net的细胞毒性化疗更有效。结论:尽管NET G3的化疗方案在PFS和OS方面没有显著差异,但基于NET的细胞毒化疗的RR明显高于基于nec的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicenter Retrospective Study of Efficacy of Systemic Therapy in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumor Grade 3 (JOSC-2001).

Background: Neuroendocrine tumor G3 (NET G3) is a new category introduced in the WHO 2017 classification. Accordingly, evidence regarding chemotherapy for NET G3 is limited. A multicenter, retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the outcomes of systemic therapy for NET G3 and to identify the optimal regimens.

Methods: Patient demographic and treatment outcome data were retrospectively collected for 73 patients with pathologically diagnosed NET G3 who started chemotherapy at participating institutions between January 2011 and December 2019, excluding those who were ineligible by central pathological review. The chemotherapy regimens used and their efficacies were evaluated.

Results: Of the 73 patients, 47 had pancreatic NETs, 10 had gastrointestinal NETs, and 16 had NETs at other sites. Central pathological review was performed for 44 patients, with a concordance rate of 95%. Initial treatment regimens included NET-based treatment (somatostatin analogue, molecular-targeted agent, cytotoxic chemotherapy such as streptozocin and temozolomide) for 37 patients, NEC-based treatment (platinum-containing chemotherapy) for 32 patients, and other regimens for 2 patients. There were no significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS) between patients receiving NET-based and NEC-based treatment, or among the individual treatment regimens. However, the response rate (RR) was higher for NET-based cytotoxic chemotherapy (50%) compared with NEC-based treatment (16%), suggesting greater efficacy of NET-based cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Conclusions: Although no significant difference in PFS or OS was found among the chemotherapy regimens for NET G3, RR was notably higher for NET-based cytotoxic chemotherapy than for NEC-based treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroendocrinology
Neuroendocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Neuroendocrinology'' publishes papers reporting original research in basic and clinical neuroendocrinology. The journal explores the complex interactions between neuronal networks and endocrine glands (in some instances also immunecells) in both central and peripheral nervous systems. Original contributions cover all aspects of the field, from molecular and cellular neuroendocrinology, physiology, pharmacology, and the neuroanatomy of neuroendocrine systems to neuroendocrine correlates of behaviour, clinical neuroendocrinology and neuroendocrine cancers. Readers also benefit from reviews by noted experts, which highlight especially active areas of current research, and special focus editions of topical interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信