电子烟最低法定销售年龄:模型政策组件实施的定性研究。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ginny Chadwick, Gina R Kruse, Maeve Stover, Cameron Alyssa Reitan, Victoria Lopez Mendez, Hattie M Kahl, Douglas E Levy
{"title":"电子烟最低法定销售年龄:模型政策组件实施的定性研究。","authors":"Ginny Chadwick, Gina R Kruse, Maeve Stover, Cameron Alyssa Reitan, Victoria Lopez Mendez, Hattie M Kahl, Douglas E Levy","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>All 50 states have e-cigarette minimum legal sales age (MLSA) policies. In 2019, national tobacco control organizations released a model MLSA policy providing guidance on how tobacco policies should be structured to effectively prevent underage sales. We explored state e-cigarette MLSA implementation in relation to the model policy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Key informant (KI) interviews were conducted with state personnel involved in MLSA implementation from a purposive sample of states. Informants were asked about policy components, implementation facilitators, challenges, and processes, based on Bullock's determinants of policy implementation framework. Interviews were coded by framework domains and analyzed for themes related to implementing model policy components. Key components included product definitions, age restrictions, licensure, funding, education, preemption, ID verification, signage, enforcement agency and protocols, compliance checks, penalties, and prosecution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between April 2023 and July 2024, 24 MLSA interviews were conducted with 32 KIs from 23 states, yielding 4589 coded passages. KIs reported engaging with model policy components during the implementation process, though states varied in their alignment with the model's recommendations, with areas of more common deviation including penalty structures, whether clerks or retailers were penalized, and required compliance checks. Several implementation factors absent from the model also emerged as important, including online sales, license transfer, \"decoy buy\" products, complaint-driven compliance checks, and product disposal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>States' e-cigarette MLSA policy implementation experiences in relation to model policy recommendations identified areas where states could improve (e.g., penalties) and novel issues (e.g., online sales) whose implementation is worthy of ongoing attention.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Insights from the state MLSA implementation experiences should inform advocates, bureaucrats, and elected officials about potential solutions to implementation barriers for e-cigarette MLSA. Findings highlight implementation facilitators and identify existing model policy components that may be improved in future guidance. Key elements for revising state policies and/or the model include shifting penalties from clerks to retailers, setting a minimum number of compliance checks, coordinating compliance programs, reconsidering criminal penalty structures, regulating online sales, preventing illegitimate license transfers, establishing complaint-driven enforcement, and requiring the inclusion of e-cigarette products in a minimum percentage of decoy buys.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimum legal sales age for e-cigarettes: A qualitative study on the implementation of model policy components.\",\"authors\":\"Ginny Chadwick, Gina R Kruse, Maeve Stover, Cameron Alyssa Reitan, Victoria Lopez Mendez, Hattie M Kahl, Douglas E Levy\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntaf197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>All 50 states have e-cigarette minimum legal sales age (MLSA) policies. In 2019, national tobacco control organizations released a model MLSA policy providing guidance on how tobacco policies should be structured to effectively prevent underage sales. We explored state e-cigarette MLSA implementation in relation to the model policy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Key informant (KI) interviews were conducted with state personnel involved in MLSA implementation from a purposive sample of states. Informants were asked about policy components, implementation facilitators, challenges, and processes, based on Bullock's determinants of policy implementation framework. Interviews were coded by framework domains and analyzed for themes related to implementing model policy components. Key components included product definitions, age restrictions, licensure, funding, education, preemption, ID verification, signage, enforcement agency and protocols, compliance checks, penalties, and prosecution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between April 2023 and July 2024, 24 MLSA interviews were conducted with 32 KIs from 23 states, yielding 4589 coded passages. KIs reported engaging with model policy components during the implementation process, though states varied in their alignment with the model's recommendations, with areas of more common deviation including penalty structures, whether clerks or retailers were penalized, and required compliance checks. Several implementation factors absent from the model also emerged as important, including online sales, license transfer, \\\"decoy buy\\\" products, complaint-driven compliance checks, and product disposal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>States' e-cigarette MLSA policy implementation experiences in relation to model policy recommendations identified areas where states could improve (e.g., penalties) and novel issues (e.g., online sales) whose implementation is worthy of ongoing attention.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Insights from the state MLSA implementation experiences should inform advocates, bureaucrats, and elected officials about potential solutions to implementation barriers for e-cigarette MLSA. Findings highlight implementation facilitators and identify existing model policy components that may be improved in future guidance. Key elements for revising state policies and/or the model include shifting penalties from clerks to retailers, setting a minimum number of compliance checks, coordinating compliance programs, reconsidering criminal penalty structures, regulating online sales, preventing illegitimate license transfers, establishing complaint-driven enforcement, and requiring the inclusion of e-cigarette products in a minimum percentage of decoy buys.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf197\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所有50个州都有电子烟最低合法销售年龄(MLSA)政策。2019年,国家烟草控制组织发布了一项示范MLSA政策,为如何制定烟草政策以有效防止未成年人销售提供指导。我们探讨了与模型政策相关的州电子烟MLSA实施。方法:从有目的的州样本中,对参与MLSA实施的州工作人员进行关键举报人访谈。根据布洛克的政策实施框架的决定因素,被问及政策组成部分、实施促进因素、挑战和过程。访谈按框架域编码,并分析与实现模型策略组件相关的主题。关键组成部分包括产品定义、年龄限制、许可证、资金、教育、抢占、身份验证、标识、执行机构和协议、合规性检查、处罚和起诉。结果:在2023年4月至2024年7月期间,对来自23个州的32名ki进行了24次MLSA访谈,产生了4589个编码段落。KIs报告说,在实施过程中与模型策略组件进行了接触,尽管各州与模型建议的一致性有所不同,但更常见的偏差领域包括惩罚结构,是否对职员或零售商进行了处罚,以及是否需要进行合规性检查。模型中缺少的几个实现因素也变得很重要,包括在线销售、许可证转让、“诱饵购买”产品、投诉驱动的遵从性检查和产品处理。结论:各州与示范政策建议相关的电子烟MLSA政策实施经验确定了各州可以改进的领域(例如,处罚)和新问题(例如,在线销售),其实施值得持续关注。启示:来自州MLSA实施经验的见解应该告知倡导者、官僚和民选官员关于电子烟MLSA实施障碍的潜在解决方案。调查结果突出了实施的促进因素,并确定了可能在未来指导中加以改进的现有模式政策组成部分。修改州政策和/或模式的关键要素包括将处罚从职员转移到零售商,设定最低数量的合规检查,协调合规计划,重新考虑刑事处罚结构,规范在线销售,防止非法许可证转让,建立投诉驱动的执法,并要求将电子烟产品纳入最低比例的诱饵购买。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimum legal sales age for e-cigarettes: A qualitative study on the implementation of model policy components.

Introduction: All 50 states have e-cigarette minimum legal sales age (MLSA) policies. In 2019, national tobacco control organizations released a model MLSA policy providing guidance on how tobacco policies should be structured to effectively prevent underage sales. We explored state e-cigarette MLSA implementation in relation to the model policy.

Methods: Key informant (KI) interviews were conducted with state personnel involved in MLSA implementation from a purposive sample of states. Informants were asked about policy components, implementation facilitators, challenges, and processes, based on Bullock's determinants of policy implementation framework. Interviews were coded by framework domains and analyzed for themes related to implementing model policy components. Key components included product definitions, age restrictions, licensure, funding, education, preemption, ID verification, signage, enforcement agency and protocols, compliance checks, penalties, and prosecution.

Results: Between April 2023 and July 2024, 24 MLSA interviews were conducted with 32 KIs from 23 states, yielding 4589 coded passages. KIs reported engaging with model policy components during the implementation process, though states varied in their alignment with the model's recommendations, with areas of more common deviation including penalty structures, whether clerks or retailers were penalized, and required compliance checks. Several implementation factors absent from the model also emerged as important, including online sales, license transfer, "decoy buy" products, complaint-driven compliance checks, and product disposal.

Conclusion: States' e-cigarette MLSA policy implementation experiences in relation to model policy recommendations identified areas where states could improve (e.g., penalties) and novel issues (e.g., online sales) whose implementation is worthy of ongoing attention.

Implications: Insights from the state MLSA implementation experiences should inform advocates, bureaucrats, and elected officials about potential solutions to implementation barriers for e-cigarette MLSA. Findings highlight implementation facilitators and identify existing model policy components that may be improved in future guidance. Key elements for revising state policies and/or the model include shifting penalties from clerks to retailers, setting a minimum number of compliance checks, coordinating compliance programs, reconsidering criminal penalty structures, regulating online sales, preventing illegitimate license transfers, establishing complaint-driven enforcement, and requiring the inclusion of e-cigarette products in a minimum percentage of decoy buys.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信