用标本PET-CT (BIMAP)评估乳腺癌术中边缘。

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Anne-Sofie De Crem, Philippe Tummers, Herman Depypere, Geert Braems, Rawand Salihi, Glenn Vergauwen, Giovanni Cisternino, Koen Van de Vijver, Pieter De Visschere, Kathia De Man, Bliede Van den Broeck, Sigi Hendrickx, Liv Veldeman, Christel Monten, Jens M Debacker, Hannelore Denys, Menekse Göker
{"title":"用标本PET-CT (BIMAP)评估乳腺癌术中边缘。","authors":"Anne-Sofie De Crem, Philippe Tummers, Herman Depypere, Geert Braems, Rawand Salihi, Glenn Vergauwen, Giovanni Cisternino, Koen Van de Vijver, Pieter De Visschere, Kathia De Man, Bliede Van den Broeck, Sigi Hendrickx, Liv Veldeman, Christel Monten, Jens M Debacker, Hannelore Denys, Menekse Göker","doi":"10.1038/s41523-025-00818-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Positive surgical margins in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer occur in 20% of cases, making intraoperative margin assessment (IMA) crucial to avoid re-operations. This study evaluated specimen PET-CT imaging for IMA in 41 patients undergoing BCS. Specimen PET-CT imaging was performed with the ß-CUBE/X-CUBE (MOLECUBES) or the AURA 10 (XEOS). Seven physicians, with varying experience, assessed margin status postoperatively as positive, close (≤1 mm), or negative using PET-CT images at 10 min acquisition time and low reconstructed [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG dose (0.8MBq/kg). Close margins on PET-CT were analyzed once as positive and once as negative. Histopathology was the gold standard. The proposed technique showed 91% sensitivity and 86% specificity for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Histopathology identified 9 positive margins in 31 IDC cases; 88% were detected by all physicians on specimen PET-CT whereas standard of care identified 44%. Therefore, specimen PET-CT will improve IMA in BCS and potentially reduce re-operation rates. The trial is registered since 20/01/2020 on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04343079) with the title: \"Intra-operative PET-CT: a Novel Approach to Determine Excision Margins in Lumpectomy Breast Cancer\".</p>","PeriodicalId":19247,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Breast Cancer","volume":"11 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast cancer Intraoperative Margin Assessment using specimen PET-CT (BIMAP).\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Sofie De Crem, Philippe Tummers, Herman Depypere, Geert Braems, Rawand Salihi, Glenn Vergauwen, Giovanni Cisternino, Koen Van de Vijver, Pieter De Visschere, Kathia De Man, Bliede Van den Broeck, Sigi Hendrickx, Liv Veldeman, Christel Monten, Jens M Debacker, Hannelore Denys, Menekse Göker\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41523-025-00818-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Positive surgical margins in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer occur in 20% of cases, making intraoperative margin assessment (IMA) crucial to avoid re-operations. This study evaluated specimen PET-CT imaging for IMA in 41 patients undergoing BCS. Specimen PET-CT imaging was performed with the ß-CUBE/X-CUBE (MOLECUBES) or the AURA 10 (XEOS). Seven physicians, with varying experience, assessed margin status postoperatively as positive, close (≤1 mm), or negative using PET-CT images at 10 min acquisition time and low reconstructed [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG dose (0.8MBq/kg). Close margins on PET-CT were analyzed once as positive and once as negative. Histopathology was the gold standard. The proposed technique showed 91% sensitivity and 86% specificity for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Histopathology identified 9 positive margins in 31 IDC cases; 88% were detected by all physicians on specimen PET-CT whereas standard of care identified 44%. Therefore, specimen PET-CT will improve IMA in BCS and potentially reduce re-operation rates. The trial is registered since 20/01/2020 on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04343079) with the title: \\\"Intra-operative PET-CT: a Novel Approach to Determine Excision Margins in Lumpectomy Breast Cancer\\\".</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Breast Cancer\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474864/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Breast Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-025-00818-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-025-00818-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳腺癌保乳手术(BCS)的手术切缘阳性发生率为20%,因此术中切缘评估(IMA)对于避免再次手术至关重要。本研究评估了41例BCS患者IMA的标本PET-CT成像。采用ß-CUBE/X-CUBE (MOLECUBES)或AURA 10 (XEOS)对标本进行PET-CT成像。7位具有不同经验的医生在10分钟采集时间和低重构[18F]FDG剂量(0.8MBq/kg)下使用PET-CT图像评估术后切缘状态为阳性、闭合(≤1mm)或阴性。PET-CT闭合边缘分析一次为阳性,一次为阴性。组织病理学是金标准。该技术对浸润性导管癌(IDC)的敏感性为91%,特异性为86%。31例IDC中,组织病理学发现9个阳性切缘;88%被所有医生在标本PET-CT上检测到,而标准护理鉴定为44%。因此,标本PET-CT将改善BCS的IMA,并可能降低再手术率。该试验于2020年1月20日在ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04343079)注册,标题为:“术中PET-CT:一种确定乳房肿瘤切除术乳腺癌切除边缘的新方法”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breast cancer Intraoperative Margin Assessment using specimen PET-CT (BIMAP).

Positive surgical margins in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer occur in 20% of cases, making intraoperative margin assessment (IMA) crucial to avoid re-operations. This study evaluated specimen PET-CT imaging for IMA in 41 patients undergoing BCS. Specimen PET-CT imaging was performed with the ß-CUBE/X-CUBE (MOLECUBES) or the AURA 10 (XEOS). Seven physicians, with varying experience, assessed margin status postoperatively as positive, close (≤1 mm), or negative using PET-CT images at 10 min acquisition time and low reconstructed [18F]FDG dose (0.8MBq/kg). Close margins on PET-CT were analyzed once as positive and once as negative. Histopathology was the gold standard. The proposed technique showed 91% sensitivity and 86% specificity for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Histopathology identified 9 positive margins in 31 IDC cases; 88% were detected by all physicians on specimen PET-CT whereas standard of care identified 44%. Therefore, specimen PET-CT will improve IMA in BCS and potentially reduce re-operation rates. The trial is registered since 20/01/2020 on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04343079) with the title: "Intra-operative PET-CT: a Novel Approach to Determine Excision Margins in Lumpectomy Breast Cancer".

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Breast Cancer
NPJ Breast Cancer Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Breast Cancer publishes original research articles, reviews, brief correspondence, meeting reports, editorial summaries and hypothesis generating observations which could be unexplained or preliminary findings from experiments, novel ideas, or the framing of new questions that need to be solved. Featured topics of the journal include imaging, immunotherapy, molecular classification of disease, mechanism-based therapies largely targeting signal transduction pathways, carcinogenesis including hereditary susceptibility and molecular epidemiology, survivorship issues including long-term toxicities of treatment and secondary neoplasm occurrence, the biophysics of cancer, mechanisms of metastasis and their perturbation, and studies of the tumor microenvironment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信