通过基因组和分子筛选发现巴西城市废水中的DENV, CHIKV和ZIKV。

IF 4.2 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Juliana Calabria de Araujo, Ana Paula A Carvalho, Talita Adelino, Felipe Campos M Iani, Natalia Rocha Guimaraes, Sara Candida F Santos, Cintia D Leal, Manuelle Natividade, Mauricio Lima, Mariana Almada, Ana Carolina Bertuce, Augusto Guerra, Maria Cristina M Costa, Flavia Saia, Vagner Fonseca, Marta Giovanetti, Livia V Frutuoso, Luiz Carlos Junior Alcantara
{"title":"通过基因组和分子筛选发现巴西城市废水中的DENV, CHIKV和ZIKV。","authors":"Juliana Calabria de Araujo, Ana Paula A Carvalho, Talita Adelino, Felipe Campos M Iani, Natalia Rocha Guimaraes, Sara Candida F Santos, Cintia D Leal, Manuelle Natividade, Mauricio Lima, Mariana Almada, Ana Carolina Bertuce, Augusto Guerra, Maria Cristina M Costa, Flavia Saia, Vagner Fonseca, Marta Giovanetti, Livia V Frutuoso, Luiz Carlos Junior Alcantara","doi":"10.3390/microorganisms13092164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated and compared molecular methods (Whole Genome Sequencing-WGS, MinION, and RT-qPCR) for the detection of arboviruses Dengue (DENV), Chikungunya (CHIKV), and Zika (ZIKV) in 63 hospital and municipal wastewater samples collected from July 2022 to May 2023 in the region of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Detection rates varied substantially across the methods (WGS, MinION, and RT-qPCR). DENV was identified in 24% (15/63) of samples using a hybrid capture method of WGS and MinION sequencing and in 66.6% (20/30) using only WGS but was not detected using the CDC Trioplex RT-PCR Assay Kit or ZDC (IBMP). CHIKV was detected in 19.0% (12/63) of the samples by WGS and MinION and in 85.7% (12/14) using only MinION sequencing. Using the RT-qPCR kit to detect CHIKV yielded a rate of 4.7% (3/63) in false positives. ZIKV was found in only one sample (1/63) by WGS, while RT-qPCR yielded a high false positive rate (65.1%, 41/63). These findings highlight the operational advantage of these methods (WGS and MinION) for enhancing early-warning surveillance where standard RT-qPCR might underperform in low-prevalence settings. This is the first study that has compared these methods to detect and genetically characterize DENV, CHICK, and ZIKV in wastewater in Brazil and has indicated that hospital wastewater can be used as a sentinel system for arbovirus surveillance. The relative effectiveness of genomic wastewater surveillance for arboviruses was demonstrated, and it was found that diagnostic RT-qPCR kits used for clinical samples were not directly suitable for environmental surveillance. The feasibility of arbovirus wastewater surveillance as an epidemiological tool was demonstrated, although absolute quantifications were not performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18667,"journal":{"name":"Microorganisms","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncovering DENV, CHIKV, and ZIKV in Urban Wastewater in Brazil Through Genomic and Molecular Screening.\",\"authors\":\"Juliana Calabria de Araujo, Ana Paula A Carvalho, Talita Adelino, Felipe Campos M Iani, Natalia Rocha Guimaraes, Sara Candida F Santos, Cintia D Leal, Manuelle Natividade, Mauricio Lima, Mariana Almada, Ana Carolina Bertuce, Augusto Guerra, Maria Cristina M Costa, Flavia Saia, Vagner Fonseca, Marta Giovanetti, Livia V Frutuoso, Luiz Carlos Junior Alcantara\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/microorganisms13092164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated and compared molecular methods (Whole Genome Sequencing-WGS, MinION, and RT-qPCR) for the detection of arboviruses Dengue (DENV), Chikungunya (CHIKV), and Zika (ZIKV) in 63 hospital and municipal wastewater samples collected from July 2022 to May 2023 in the region of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Detection rates varied substantially across the methods (WGS, MinION, and RT-qPCR). DENV was identified in 24% (15/63) of samples using a hybrid capture method of WGS and MinION sequencing and in 66.6% (20/30) using only WGS but was not detected using the CDC Trioplex RT-PCR Assay Kit or ZDC (IBMP). CHIKV was detected in 19.0% (12/63) of the samples by WGS and MinION and in 85.7% (12/14) using only MinION sequencing. Using the RT-qPCR kit to detect CHIKV yielded a rate of 4.7% (3/63) in false positives. ZIKV was found in only one sample (1/63) by WGS, while RT-qPCR yielded a high false positive rate (65.1%, 41/63). These findings highlight the operational advantage of these methods (WGS and MinION) for enhancing early-warning surveillance where standard RT-qPCR might underperform in low-prevalence settings. This is the first study that has compared these methods to detect and genetically characterize DENV, CHICK, and ZIKV in wastewater in Brazil and has indicated that hospital wastewater can be used as a sentinel system for arbovirus surveillance. The relative effectiveness of genomic wastewater surveillance for arboviruses was demonstrated, and it was found that diagnostic RT-qPCR kits used for clinical samples were not directly suitable for environmental surveillance. The feasibility of arbovirus wastewater surveillance as an epidemiological tool was demonstrated, although absolute quantifications were not performed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microorganisms\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472667/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microorganisms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13092164\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microorganisms","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13092164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估和比较了2022年7月至2023年5月在巴西贝洛奥里藏特地区收集的63家医院和城市废水样本中检测登革热(DENV)、基孔肯雅(CHIKV)和寨卡(ZIKV)虫媒病毒的分子方法(全基因组测序- wgs、MinION和RT-qPCR)。不同方法(WGS、MinION和RT-qPCR)的检出率差异很大。使用WGS和MinION测序的混合捕获方法,24%(15/63)的样本中检测到DENV, 66.6%(20/30)的样本仅使用WGS,但使用CDC Trioplex RT-PCR Assay Kit或ZDC (IBMP)未检测到DENV。使用WGS和MinION测序检测到CHIKV的检出率为19.0%(12/63),仅使用MinION测序检测到85.7%(12/14)。使用RT-qPCR试剂盒检测CHIKV的假阳性率为4.7%(3/63)。WGS检测仅检出1份(1/63)寨卡病毒,而RT-qPCR的假阳性率较高(65.1%,41/63)。这些发现突出了这些方法(WGS和MinION)在加强早期预警监测方面的操作优势,在低患病率环境中,标准RT-qPCR可能表现不佳。这是第一个比较巴西废水中DENV、CHICK和ZIKV检测方法和遗传特征的研究,并表明医院废水可以用作虫媒病毒监测的哨点系统。研究证实了虫媒病毒基因组废水监测的相对有效性,并发现用于临床样本的诊断性RT-qPCR试剂盒不直接适用于环境监测。证明了虫媒病毒废水监测作为流行病学工具的可行性,尽管没有进行绝对量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Uncovering DENV, CHIKV, and ZIKV in Urban Wastewater in Brazil Through Genomic and Molecular Screening.

Uncovering DENV, CHIKV, and ZIKV in Urban Wastewater in Brazil Through Genomic and Molecular Screening.

This study evaluated and compared molecular methods (Whole Genome Sequencing-WGS, MinION, and RT-qPCR) for the detection of arboviruses Dengue (DENV), Chikungunya (CHIKV), and Zika (ZIKV) in 63 hospital and municipal wastewater samples collected from July 2022 to May 2023 in the region of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Detection rates varied substantially across the methods (WGS, MinION, and RT-qPCR). DENV was identified in 24% (15/63) of samples using a hybrid capture method of WGS and MinION sequencing and in 66.6% (20/30) using only WGS but was not detected using the CDC Trioplex RT-PCR Assay Kit or ZDC (IBMP). CHIKV was detected in 19.0% (12/63) of the samples by WGS and MinION and in 85.7% (12/14) using only MinION sequencing. Using the RT-qPCR kit to detect CHIKV yielded a rate of 4.7% (3/63) in false positives. ZIKV was found in only one sample (1/63) by WGS, while RT-qPCR yielded a high false positive rate (65.1%, 41/63). These findings highlight the operational advantage of these methods (WGS and MinION) for enhancing early-warning surveillance where standard RT-qPCR might underperform in low-prevalence settings. This is the first study that has compared these methods to detect and genetically characterize DENV, CHICK, and ZIKV in wastewater in Brazil and has indicated that hospital wastewater can be used as a sentinel system for arbovirus surveillance. The relative effectiveness of genomic wastewater surveillance for arboviruses was demonstrated, and it was found that diagnostic RT-qPCR kits used for clinical samples were not directly suitable for environmental surveillance. The feasibility of arbovirus wastewater surveillance as an epidemiological tool was demonstrated, although absolute quantifications were not performed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microorganisms
Microorganisms Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2168
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: Microorganisms (ISSN 2076-2607) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and prions. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信