Palacos和Simplex丙烯酸水泥中庆大霉素和妥布霉素缓释及抗菌效果的比较研究。

IF 4.2 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Débora Coraça-Huber, Martina Humez, Klaus-Dieter Kühn
{"title":"Palacos和Simplex丙烯酸水泥中庆大霉素和妥布霉素缓释及抗菌效果的比较研究。","authors":"Débora Coraça-Huber, Martina Humez, Klaus-Dieter Kühn","doi":"10.3390/microorganisms13092174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibiotic-loaded bone cements (ALBCs) are used to prevent and treat periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). This study compares the in vitro release and antibacterial effectiveness of gentamicin from Palacos<sup>®</sup> R+G and tobramycin from Simplex<sup>®</sup> T. Standardized cylindrical specimens of Palacos<sup>®</sup> R+G and Simplex<sup>®</sup> T were incubated in phosphate-buffered saline. Antibiotic release was quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) over 14 and 42 days. Antibacterial efficacy was assessed using inhibition zone tests (IZT) against <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, and <i>Escherichia coli</i> over 42 days. Palacos<sup>®</sup> R+G exhibited a significantly higher and more sustained antibiotic release of gentamicin compared to tobramycin from Simplex<sup>®</sup> T. The cumulative release of gentamicin from Palacos<sup>®</sup> R+G was 1.148 µg/cm<sup>2</sup>, while Simplex<sup>®</sup> T released 198.87 µg/cm<sup>2</sup> tobramycin over 14 days. Inhibition zone tests showed that Palacos<sup>®</sup> R+G maintained antibacterial activity for 42 days, while Simplex<sup>®</sup> T's activity diminished after 14 days. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences in antibacterial efficacy between the two cements. Palacos<sup>®</sup> R+G demonstrated superior gentamicin release and sustained antibacterial activity compared to tobramycin from Simplex<sup>®</sup> T. These findings suggest that Palacos<sup>®</sup> R+G may offer better clinical outcomes in preventing and treating PJIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":18667,"journal":{"name":"Microorganisms","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Extended Gentamicin and Tobramycin Release and Antibacterial Efficacy from Palacos and Simplex Acrylic Cements.\",\"authors\":\"Débora Coraça-Huber, Martina Humez, Klaus-Dieter Kühn\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/microorganisms13092174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antibiotic-loaded bone cements (ALBCs) are used to prevent and treat periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). This study compares the in vitro release and antibacterial effectiveness of gentamicin from Palacos<sup>®</sup> R+G and tobramycin from Simplex<sup>®</sup> T. Standardized cylindrical specimens of Palacos<sup>®</sup> R+G and Simplex<sup>®</sup> T were incubated in phosphate-buffered saline. Antibiotic release was quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) over 14 and 42 days. Antibacterial efficacy was assessed using inhibition zone tests (IZT) against <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, and <i>Escherichia coli</i> over 42 days. Palacos<sup>®</sup> R+G exhibited a significantly higher and more sustained antibiotic release of gentamicin compared to tobramycin from Simplex<sup>®</sup> T. The cumulative release of gentamicin from Palacos<sup>®</sup> R+G was 1.148 µg/cm<sup>2</sup>, while Simplex<sup>®</sup> T released 198.87 µg/cm<sup>2</sup> tobramycin over 14 days. Inhibition zone tests showed that Palacos<sup>®</sup> R+G maintained antibacterial activity for 42 days, while Simplex<sup>®</sup> T's activity diminished after 14 days. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences in antibacterial efficacy between the two cements. Palacos<sup>®</sup> R+G demonstrated superior gentamicin release and sustained antibacterial activity compared to tobramycin from Simplex<sup>®</sup> T. These findings suggest that Palacos<sup>®</sup> R+G may offer better clinical outcomes in preventing and treating PJIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microorganisms\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473054/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microorganisms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13092174\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microorganisms","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13092174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

载抗生素骨水泥(ALBCs)用于预防和治疗假体周围关节感染(PJI)。本研究比较了Palacos®R+G中庆大霉素和Simplex®T中妥布霉素的体外释放和抗菌效果。Palacos®R+G和Simplex®T的标准圆柱形标本在磷酸盐缓冲盐水中培养。采用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定14和42 d的抗生素释放量。采用抑菌区试验(IZT)对金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌进行42天的抑菌效果评价。与Simplex®T相比,Palacos®R+G的庆大霉素释放量明显更高且更持久。在14天内,Palacos®R+G的庆大霉素累积释放量为1.148µG /cm2,而Simplex®T的庆大霉素累积释放量为198.87µG /cm2。抑制区试验表明,Palacos®R+G的抑菌活性维持了42天,而Simplex®T的抑菌活性在14天后下降。统计分析证实两种水泥的抗菌效果有显著差异。与Simplex®t的妥布霉素相比,Palacos®R+G显示出更好的庆大霉素释放和持续的抗菌活性。这些研究结果表明,Palacos®R+G可能在预防和治疗PJIs方面提供更好的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Comparative Study of Extended Gentamicin and Tobramycin Release and Antibacterial Efficacy from Palacos and Simplex Acrylic Cements.

A Comparative Study of Extended Gentamicin and Tobramycin Release and Antibacterial Efficacy from Palacos and Simplex Acrylic Cements.

A Comparative Study of Extended Gentamicin and Tobramycin Release and Antibacterial Efficacy from Palacos and Simplex Acrylic Cements.

A Comparative Study of Extended Gentamicin and Tobramycin Release and Antibacterial Efficacy from Palacos and Simplex Acrylic Cements.

Antibiotic-loaded bone cements (ALBCs) are used to prevent and treat periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). This study compares the in vitro release and antibacterial effectiveness of gentamicin from Palacos® R+G and tobramycin from Simplex® T. Standardized cylindrical specimens of Palacos® R+G and Simplex® T were incubated in phosphate-buffered saline. Antibiotic release was quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) over 14 and 42 days. Antibacterial efficacy was assessed using inhibition zone tests (IZT) against Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Escherichia coli over 42 days. Palacos® R+G exhibited a significantly higher and more sustained antibiotic release of gentamicin compared to tobramycin from Simplex® T. The cumulative release of gentamicin from Palacos® R+G was 1.148 µg/cm2, while Simplex® T released 198.87 µg/cm2 tobramycin over 14 days. Inhibition zone tests showed that Palacos® R+G maintained antibacterial activity for 42 days, while Simplex® T's activity diminished after 14 days. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences in antibacterial efficacy between the two cements. Palacos® R+G demonstrated superior gentamicin release and sustained antibacterial activity compared to tobramycin from Simplex® T. These findings suggest that Palacos® R+G may offer better clinical outcomes in preventing and treating PJIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microorganisms
Microorganisms Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2168
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: Microorganisms (ISSN 2076-2607) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and prions. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信