叠加式力传感器的设计与研究。

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Micromachines Pub Date : 2025-09-22 DOI:10.3390/mi16091069
Genshang Wu, Jinggan Shao, Yicun Xu, Zhanshu He, Shifei Liu
{"title":"叠加式力传感器的设计与研究。","authors":"Genshang Wu, Jinggan Shao, Yicun Xu, Zhanshu He, Shifei Liu","doi":"10.3390/mi16091069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The measurement accuracy and equipment stability of superposition-type force sensors are primarily influenced by the layout and number of individual force sensors. Analyzing this impact effect through experimental testing for each configuration would consume significant manpower, material resources, and financial costs. To efficiently analyze the influence of the number of paralleled individual sensors and their layout within a superposition-type force measurement instrument on overall device stability and force measurement accuracy, this paper employs SolidWorks to establish models of force instruments based on common superposition schemes. Subsequently, ANSYS is utilized to perform finite element analysis on models of different schemes, obtaining corresponding data on total deformation, stress, and simulated force values. The analysis results indicate that a relatively sparse sensor layout with symmetric arrangement around the center point of the base plate enhances overall stability, and the force measurement error can be controlled within several ten-thousandths. Furthermore, the more stable and higher-accuracy schemes identified through simulation analysis were compared with practical experimental results to analyze theoretical versus actual errors. The test results showed that when the three single force sensors are placed in a \"Pin font\" shape, the sum of the forces measured by each individual sensor differs from the sum of the forces measured by the superimposed sensors by only a few ten-thousandths, which is within the acceptable range.</p>","PeriodicalId":18508,"journal":{"name":"Micromachines","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12471882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and Research of Superimposed Force Sensor.\",\"authors\":\"Genshang Wu, Jinggan Shao, Yicun Xu, Zhanshu He, Shifei Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/mi16091069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The measurement accuracy and equipment stability of superposition-type force sensors are primarily influenced by the layout and number of individual force sensors. Analyzing this impact effect through experimental testing for each configuration would consume significant manpower, material resources, and financial costs. To efficiently analyze the influence of the number of paralleled individual sensors and their layout within a superposition-type force measurement instrument on overall device stability and force measurement accuracy, this paper employs SolidWorks to establish models of force instruments based on common superposition schemes. Subsequently, ANSYS is utilized to perform finite element analysis on models of different schemes, obtaining corresponding data on total deformation, stress, and simulated force values. The analysis results indicate that a relatively sparse sensor layout with symmetric arrangement around the center point of the base plate enhances overall stability, and the force measurement error can be controlled within several ten-thousandths. Furthermore, the more stable and higher-accuracy schemes identified through simulation analysis were compared with practical experimental results to analyze theoretical versus actual errors. The test results showed that when the three single force sensors are placed in a \\\"Pin font\\\" shape, the sum of the forces measured by each individual sensor differs from the sum of the forces measured by the superimposed sensors by only a few ten-thousandths, which is within the acceptable range.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Micromachines\",\"volume\":\"16 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12471882/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Micromachines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16091069\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Micromachines","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16091069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

叠加式力传感器的测量精度和设备稳定性主要受单个力传感器的布局和数量的影响。通过对每个配置进行实验测试来分析这种影响将消耗大量的人力、物力和财务成本。为了有效分析叠加式测力仪内并联单个传感器的数量及其布局对整体装置稳定性和测力精度的影响,本文采用SolidWorks基于常用的叠加方案建立了测力仪的模型。随后,利用ANSYS对不同方案的模型进行有限元分析,得到相应的总变形、应力和模拟力值数据。分析结果表明,相对稀疏的传感器布局,围绕底板中心点对称布置,提高了整体稳定性,测力误差可控制在万分之几以内。此外,通过仿真分析确定了更稳定、精度更高的方案,并对实际实验结果进行了比较,分析了理论误差与实际误差。试验结果表明,当三个单力传感器以“Pin字型”的形式放置时,单个传感器测得的力与叠加传感器测得的力之和相差只有万分之几,在可接受的范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Design and Research of Superimposed Force Sensor.

Design and Research of Superimposed Force Sensor.

Design and Research of Superimposed Force Sensor.

Design and Research of Superimposed Force Sensor.

The measurement accuracy and equipment stability of superposition-type force sensors are primarily influenced by the layout and number of individual force sensors. Analyzing this impact effect through experimental testing for each configuration would consume significant manpower, material resources, and financial costs. To efficiently analyze the influence of the number of paralleled individual sensors and their layout within a superposition-type force measurement instrument on overall device stability and force measurement accuracy, this paper employs SolidWorks to establish models of force instruments based on common superposition schemes. Subsequently, ANSYS is utilized to perform finite element analysis on models of different schemes, obtaining corresponding data on total deformation, stress, and simulated force values. The analysis results indicate that a relatively sparse sensor layout with symmetric arrangement around the center point of the base plate enhances overall stability, and the force measurement error can be controlled within several ten-thousandths. Furthermore, the more stable and higher-accuracy schemes identified through simulation analysis were compared with practical experimental results to analyze theoretical versus actual errors. The test results showed that when the three single force sensors are placed in a "Pin font" shape, the sum of the forces measured by each individual sensor differs from the sum of the forces measured by the superimposed sensors by only a few ten-thousandths, which is within the acceptable range.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Micromachines
Micromachines NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY-INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.70%
发文量
1862
审稿时长
16.31 days
期刊介绍: Micromachines (ISSN 2072-666X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to micro-scaled machines and micromachinery. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信