EXPRESS:猫椎间盘疾病——一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Robin Ebeling, Nina D Lorenz, Yury Zablotski, Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg, Matthias Kornmayer
{"title":"EXPRESS:猫椎间盘疾病——一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Robin Ebeling, Nina D Lorenz, Yury Zablotski, Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg, Matthias Kornmayer","doi":"10.1177/1098612X251385878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Feline intervertebral disc disease (IVDD), historically an uncommonly described problem, is being increasingly documented in the current literature.The objective of this systematic review is to consolidate existing knowledge of feline IVDD, identify possible prognostic factors and assist by offering clearer guidelines when managing a feline spinal patient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of two databases was conducted using keywords related to feline IVDD. Studies with cats diagnosed with IVDD, including treatment and outcome details, were reviewed. Prognostic factors were evaluated for their impact on overall outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 57 studies with 1113 cats were identified, after the reviewing process, 23 studies with 93 cats remained for statistical analysis. Most cats (59%) had lumbar spine involvement, followed by thoracolumbar (31%) and cervical (5%) segments. Intervertebral disc extrusion (IVDE) was the most common diagnosis (65/93), followed by intervertebral disc protrusion (IVDP) (16/93) and acute non-compressive nucleus pulposus extrusion (ANNPE) (12/93). Deep pain perception was preserved in 87% of cats. Surgical intervention was performed in 75/93 cats while 17/93 were treated conservatively, 1/93 being euthanized intraoperatively. Overall, 85% of cats had a positive outcome, 11% had a negative outcome, and outcomes were undetermined in 4% of cases. Possible influencing factors analyzed included the breed, sex, age (in years and life stage), weight, affected spinal segment, number of affected discs, micturition status, treatment choice, deep pain perception and IVDD type.No statistically significant prognostic factors (p>0.05) were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Although no specific prognostic factors could be identified, the systematic review suggests that feline IVDD has a predominantly positive prognosis regardless of treatment choice. Given the low evidence level and small sample size, further multicenter, prospective studies with larger cohorts are required to establish reliable prognostic factors for feline IVDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1098612X251385878"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: Feline intervertebral disc disease - a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Robin Ebeling, Nina D Lorenz, Yury Zablotski, Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg, Matthias Kornmayer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1098612X251385878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Feline intervertebral disc disease (IVDD), historically an uncommonly described problem, is being increasingly documented in the current literature.The objective of this systematic review is to consolidate existing knowledge of feline IVDD, identify possible prognostic factors and assist by offering clearer guidelines when managing a feline spinal patient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of two databases was conducted using keywords related to feline IVDD. Studies with cats diagnosed with IVDD, including treatment and outcome details, were reviewed. Prognostic factors were evaluated for their impact on overall outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 57 studies with 1113 cats were identified, after the reviewing process, 23 studies with 93 cats remained for statistical analysis. Most cats (59%) had lumbar spine involvement, followed by thoracolumbar (31%) and cervical (5%) segments. Intervertebral disc extrusion (IVDE) was the most common diagnosis (65/93), followed by intervertebral disc protrusion (IVDP) (16/93) and acute non-compressive nucleus pulposus extrusion (ANNPE) (12/93). Deep pain perception was preserved in 87% of cats. Surgical intervention was performed in 75/93 cats while 17/93 were treated conservatively, 1/93 being euthanized intraoperatively. Overall, 85% of cats had a positive outcome, 11% had a negative outcome, and outcomes were undetermined in 4% of cases. Possible influencing factors analyzed included the breed, sex, age (in years and life stage), weight, affected spinal segment, number of affected discs, micturition status, treatment choice, deep pain perception and IVDD type.No statistically significant prognostic factors (p>0.05) were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Although no specific prognostic factors could be identified, the systematic review suggests that feline IVDD has a predominantly positive prognosis regardless of treatment choice. Given the low evidence level and small sample size, further multicenter, prospective studies with larger cohorts are required to establish reliable prognostic factors for feline IVDD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1098612X251385878\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X251385878\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X251385878","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:猫椎间盘疾病(IVDD)在历史上是一个不常见的问题,在当前的文献中越来越多地被记录下来。本系统综述的目的是巩固现有的猫科动物IVDD知识,确定可能的预后因素,并通过提供更清晰的指导方针来帮助管理猫科动物脊柱患者。方法:采用与猫IVDD相关的关键词对两个数据库进行系统检索。本文回顾了对诊断为IVDD的猫的研究,包括治疗和结果细节。评估预后因素对总体结果的影响。结果:共鉴定出57项研究,共1113只猫,经过审查过程,剩余23项研究,共93只猫进行统计分析。大多数猫(59%)累及腰椎,其次是胸腰椎(31%)和颈椎(5%)节段。椎间盘突出(IVDE)是最常见的诊断(65/93),其次是椎间盘突出(IVDP)(16/93)和急性非压缩性髓核挤压(ANNPE)(12/93)。87%的猫保持了深度疼痛感知。75/93只猫进行手术干预,17/93只猫进行保守治疗,1/93只猫在术中安乐死。总体而言,85%的猫有阳性结果,11%有阴性结果,4%的病例结果不确定。分析可能的影响因素包括犬种、性别、年龄(以年龄和生命阶段计算)、体重、受累脊柱节段、受累椎间盘数目、排尿状况、治疗选择、深痛感觉和IVDD类型。未发现有统计学意义的预后因素(p < 0.05)。结论和相关性:虽然没有确定具体的预后因素,但系统评价表明,无论治疗选择如何,猫IVDD的预后主要是积极的。鉴于证据水平低且样本量小,需要进一步开展多中心、更大队列的前瞻性研究,以确定可靠的猫IVDD预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EXPRESS: Feline intervertebral disc disease - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: Feline intervertebral disc disease (IVDD), historically an uncommonly described problem, is being increasingly documented in the current literature.The objective of this systematic review is to consolidate existing knowledge of feline IVDD, identify possible prognostic factors and assist by offering clearer guidelines when managing a feline spinal patient.

Methods: A systematic search of two databases was conducted using keywords related to feline IVDD. Studies with cats diagnosed with IVDD, including treatment and outcome details, were reviewed. Prognostic factors were evaluated for their impact on overall outcomes.

Results: A total of 57 studies with 1113 cats were identified, after the reviewing process, 23 studies with 93 cats remained for statistical analysis. Most cats (59%) had lumbar spine involvement, followed by thoracolumbar (31%) and cervical (5%) segments. Intervertebral disc extrusion (IVDE) was the most common diagnosis (65/93), followed by intervertebral disc protrusion (IVDP) (16/93) and acute non-compressive nucleus pulposus extrusion (ANNPE) (12/93). Deep pain perception was preserved in 87% of cats. Surgical intervention was performed in 75/93 cats while 17/93 were treated conservatively, 1/93 being euthanized intraoperatively. Overall, 85% of cats had a positive outcome, 11% had a negative outcome, and outcomes were undetermined in 4% of cases. Possible influencing factors analyzed included the breed, sex, age (in years and life stage), weight, affected spinal segment, number of affected discs, micturition status, treatment choice, deep pain perception and IVDD type.No statistically significant prognostic factors (p>0.05) were identified.

Conclusion and relevance: Although no specific prognostic factors could be identified, the systematic review suggests that feline IVDD has a predominantly positive prognosis regardless of treatment choice. Given the low evidence level and small sample size, further multicenter, prospective studies with larger cohorts are required to establish reliable prognostic factors for feline IVDD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
254
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: JFMS is an international, peer-reviewed journal aimed at both practitioners and researchers with an interest in the clinical veterinary healthcare of domestic cats. The journal is published monthly in two formats: ‘Classic’ editions containing high-quality original papers on all aspects of feline medicine and surgery, including basic research relevant to clinical practice; and dedicated ‘Clinical Practice’ editions primarily containing opinionated review articles providing state-of-the-art information for feline clinicians, along with other relevant articles such as consensus guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信