骨科复位机器人治疗老年人低能量骨质疏松性不稳定骨盆骨折的回顾性分析。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Zhe Lu, Hou Xiuxiu, Baorui Xing
{"title":"骨科复位机器人治疗老年人低能量骨质疏松性不稳定骨盆骨折的回顾性分析。","authors":"Zhe Lu, Hou Xiuxiu, Baorui Xing","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-06258-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the Rossum Robot in assisting full-process closed reduction and internal fixation for low-energy osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 37 patients with osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures due to low-energy trauma, who underwent robotic reduction and internal fixation surgery between October 2023 and May 2024. Eighteen patients underwent Rossum Robot-assisted full-process closed reduction and internal fixation (RoRobot group), while 19 patients underwent percutaneous screw fixation with TiRobot assistance (TiRobot group). We compared the excellent and good rate of fracture reduction (EGR), the accuracy of screw placement (ASP), and the degree of fracture healing between the two groups. Efficacy indicators included changes in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and the Majeed score at preoperative, 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. Statistical correlations were assessed using independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and non-parametric tests.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The EGR in the RoRobot assistance group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P = 0.019). No significant difference was observed in fracture healing between the two groups post-surgery (P = 0.157). No significant difference was found in ASP between the RoRobot and TiRobot assistant groups (P = 0.619). No significant difference was observed in the preoperative VAS and Majeed scores between the two groups (P = 0.611, P = 0.939). Both groups showed significant improvement in VAS scores post-surgery. One week and one month after surgery, the VAS score in the RoRobot assisted group was significantly lower than in the TiRobot assisted group (P = 0.000, P = 0.001). Majeed scores significantly increased in both groups post-surgery, and during multiple follow-ups within six months, the RoRobot assisted group showed significantly higher Majeed scores than the TiRobot assisted group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In elderly patients with osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures resulting from low-energy injuries, Rossum robot-assisted pelvic fracture closed reduction and internal fixation surgery leads to less tissue damage, more effective fracture reduction, better postoperative pain relief, and faster recovery compared to TiRobot-assisted internal fixation surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"844"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective analysis of the use of orthopedic reduction robots in treating low-energy osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures in the elderly.\",\"authors\":\"Zhe Lu, Hou Xiuxiu, Baorui Xing\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13018-025-06258-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the Rossum Robot in assisting full-process closed reduction and internal fixation for low-energy osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 37 patients with osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures due to low-energy trauma, who underwent robotic reduction and internal fixation surgery between October 2023 and May 2024. Eighteen patients underwent Rossum Robot-assisted full-process closed reduction and internal fixation (RoRobot group), while 19 patients underwent percutaneous screw fixation with TiRobot assistance (TiRobot group). We compared the excellent and good rate of fracture reduction (EGR), the accuracy of screw placement (ASP), and the degree of fracture healing between the two groups. Efficacy indicators included changes in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and the Majeed score at preoperative, 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. Statistical correlations were assessed using independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and non-parametric tests.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The EGR in the RoRobot assistance group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P = 0.019). No significant difference was observed in fracture healing between the two groups post-surgery (P = 0.157). No significant difference was found in ASP between the RoRobot and TiRobot assistant groups (P = 0.619). No significant difference was observed in the preoperative VAS and Majeed scores between the two groups (P = 0.611, P = 0.939). Both groups showed significant improvement in VAS scores post-surgery. One week and one month after surgery, the VAS score in the RoRobot assisted group was significantly lower than in the TiRobot assisted group (P = 0.000, P = 0.001). Majeed scores significantly increased in both groups post-surgery, and during multiple follow-ups within six months, the RoRobot assisted group showed significantly higher Majeed scores than the TiRobot assisted group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In elderly patients with osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures resulting from low-energy injuries, Rossum robot-assisted pelvic fracture closed reduction and internal fixation surgery leads to less tissue damage, more effective fracture reduction, better postoperative pain relief, and faster recovery compared to TiRobot-assisted internal fixation surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"844\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465602/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06258-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06258-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价Rossum机器人辅助老年低能量骨质疏松性不稳定骨盆骨折全程闭合复位内固定的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2023年10月至2024年5月间行机器人复位内固定手术的37例骨质疏松性不稳定骨盆骨折患者的临床资料。18例患者采用Rossum机器人辅助全过程闭合复位内固定(RoRobot组),19例患者采用TiRobot辅助经皮螺钉固定(TiRobot组)。比较两组骨折复位优良率(EGR)、螺钉置入精度(ASP)和骨折愈合程度。疗效指标包括术前、1周、1个月、3个月和6个月随访时疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Majeed评分的变化。采用独立t检验、卡方检验和非参数检验评估统计相关性。结果:机器人辅助组EGR显著高于对照组(P = 0.019)。两组术后骨折愈合无显著差异(P = 0.157)。RoRobot和TiRobot助手组的ASP差异无统计学意义(P = 0.619)。两组患者术前VAS评分和Majeed评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P = 0.611, P = 0.939)。两组术后VAS评分均有显著改善。术后1周和1个月,RoRobot辅助组VAS评分明显低于TiRobot辅助组(P = 0.000, P = 0.001)。术后两组患者的Majeed评分均显著提高,在6个月内的多次随访中,RoRobot辅助组的Majeed评分明显高于TiRobot辅助组。结论:在老年骨质疏松性不稳定骨盆骨折低能量损伤患者中,Rossum机器人辅助盆腔骨折闭合复位内固定手术与tirobot辅助内固定手术相比,组织损伤更小,骨折复位更有效,术后疼痛缓解更好,恢复更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective analysis of the use of orthopedic reduction robots in treating low-energy osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures in the elderly.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the Rossum Robot in assisting full-process closed reduction and internal fixation for low-energy osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures in elderly patients.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 37 patients with osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures due to low-energy trauma, who underwent robotic reduction and internal fixation surgery between October 2023 and May 2024. Eighteen patients underwent Rossum Robot-assisted full-process closed reduction and internal fixation (RoRobot group), while 19 patients underwent percutaneous screw fixation with TiRobot assistance (TiRobot group). We compared the excellent and good rate of fracture reduction (EGR), the accuracy of screw placement (ASP), and the degree of fracture healing between the two groups. Efficacy indicators included changes in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and the Majeed score at preoperative, 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. Statistical correlations were assessed using independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and non-parametric tests.

Result: The EGR in the RoRobot assistance group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P = 0.019). No significant difference was observed in fracture healing between the two groups post-surgery (P = 0.157). No significant difference was found in ASP between the RoRobot and TiRobot assistant groups (P = 0.619). No significant difference was observed in the preoperative VAS and Majeed scores between the two groups (P = 0.611, P = 0.939). Both groups showed significant improvement in VAS scores post-surgery. One week and one month after surgery, the VAS score in the RoRobot assisted group was significantly lower than in the TiRobot assisted group (P = 0.000, P = 0.001). Majeed scores significantly increased in both groups post-surgery, and during multiple follow-ups within six months, the RoRobot assisted group showed significantly higher Majeed scores than the TiRobot assisted group.

Conclusion: In elderly patients with osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures resulting from low-energy injuries, Rossum robot-assisted pelvic fracture closed reduction and internal fixation surgery leads to less tissue damage, more effective fracture reduction, better postoperative pain relief, and faster recovery compared to TiRobot-assisted internal fixation surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信