为家长和学习治疗师评估学习障碍网站:观察混合方法研究。

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Olga Hermansson, Paula Dümig, Björn Witzel, Lior Weinreich, Susanne Volkmer, Gerd Schulte-Körne, Kristina Moll
{"title":"为家长和学习治疗师评估学习障碍网站:观察混合方法研究。","authors":"Olga Hermansson, Paula Dümig, Björn Witzel, Lior Weinreich, Susanne Volkmer, Gerd Schulte-Körne, Kristina Moll","doi":"10.2196/68365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Between 5% and 15% of children worldwide have a specific learning disorder. This creates a substantial demand for information among both parents and professionals. LONDI (londi.de) is a German-language website that (1) provides evidence-based information on learning disorders and (2) offers a tool to search for relevant diagnostics and intervention measures for professionals (Help System). This paper reports the results of an evaluation study of the website.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to (1) evaluate the website and (2) inform existing theories on technology acceptance and user satisfaction. The study was conducted using the RE-AIM framework for evaluating public health impact and the information system continuance intention framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed methods observational study was conducted online from February 2023 to August 2023 in Germany. Parents of children with learning difficulties and learning therapists participated in a 1.5-hour online session in which they were guided through the website. A pre-post design was used to assess changes in participants' knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy. Additionally, two path models assessing the predicting factors of the intention to further use (ie, continuance intention) and the intention to recommend the website were tested. The first model was based on the widely used information system continuance intention framework and tested expectations confirmation, perceived usefulness, and website satisfaction as predictors of the continuance intention and the intention to recommend the website. The second model focused on usability, content perception, visual aesthetics, and satisfaction as predictors of the same outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 77 parents and 73 learning therapists participated in the study. In the sample of learning therapists, age correlated negatively with usability opinion and website satisfaction. A 2-tailed t test revealed a significant increase in knowledge about learning disorders in both groups (parents: t<sub>76</sub>=12.02, P<.001; learning therapists: t<sub>71</sub>=7.03, P<.001). There was no change in attitudes and self-efficacy in parents (F<sub>1,76</sub>=2.04, P=.14; Wilks lambda=0.95), but there was a significant change for learning therapists (F<sub>1,68</sub>=15.83, P<.001; Wilks lambda=0.68) after using the website. A path analysis revealed that the intention to recommend the website can be included as an additional variable in the information system continuance intention framework. For the informational pages, content perception and visual aesthetics significantly predicted website satisfaction (R<sup>2</sup>=0.59, F<sub>3,143</sub>=69.06, P<.001), and content perception significantly predicted continuance intention (R<sup>2</sup>=0.45, F<sub>3,143</sub>=39.74, P<.001). For the Help System, usability was the only significant predictor of website satisfaction (R<sup>2</sup>=0.45, F<sub>2,67</sub>=28.16, P<.001), continuance intention (R<sup>2</sup>=0.34, F<sub>1,68</sub>=34.57, P<.001), and intention to recommend (R<sup>2</sup>=0.21, F<sub>1,68</sub>=19.02, P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The website has been evaluated positively and has proven useful for the target audience. Predictors of website acceptance and further use are contextual and depend on the website type.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e68365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating a Website on Learning Disorders for Parents and Learning Therapists: Observational Mixed Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Olga Hermansson, Paula Dümig, Björn Witzel, Lior Weinreich, Susanne Volkmer, Gerd Schulte-Körne, Kristina Moll\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/68365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Between 5% and 15% of children worldwide have a specific learning disorder. This creates a substantial demand for information among both parents and professionals. LONDI (londi.de) is a German-language website that (1) provides evidence-based information on learning disorders and (2) offers a tool to search for relevant diagnostics and intervention measures for professionals (Help System). This paper reports the results of an evaluation study of the website.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to (1) evaluate the website and (2) inform existing theories on technology acceptance and user satisfaction. The study was conducted using the RE-AIM framework for evaluating public health impact and the information system continuance intention framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed methods observational study was conducted online from February 2023 to August 2023 in Germany. Parents of children with learning difficulties and learning therapists participated in a 1.5-hour online session in which they were guided through the website. A pre-post design was used to assess changes in participants' knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy. Additionally, two path models assessing the predicting factors of the intention to further use (ie, continuance intention) and the intention to recommend the website were tested. The first model was based on the widely used information system continuance intention framework and tested expectations confirmation, perceived usefulness, and website satisfaction as predictors of the continuance intention and the intention to recommend the website. The second model focused on usability, content perception, visual aesthetics, and satisfaction as predictors of the same outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 77 parents and 73 learning therapists participated in the study. In the sample of learning therapists, age correlated negatively with usability opinion and website satisfaction. A 2-tailed t test revealed a significant increase in knowledge about learning disorders in both groups (parents: t<sub>76</sub>=12.02, P<.001; learning therapists: t<sub>71</sub>=7.03, P<.001). There was no change in attitudes and self-efficacy in parents (F<sub>1,76</sub>=2.04, P=.14; Wilks lambda=0.95), but there was a significant change for learning therapists (F<sub>1,68</sub>=15.83, P<.001; Wilks lambda=0.68) after using the website. A path analysis revealed that the intention to recommend the website can be included as an additional variable in the information system continuance intention framework. For the informational pages, content perception and visual aesthetics significantly predicted website satisfaction (R<sup>2</sup>=0.59, F<sub>3,143</sub>=69.06, P<.001), and content perception significantly predicted continuance intention (R<sup>2</sup>=0.45, F<sub>3,143</sub>=39.74, P<.001). For the Help System, usability was the only significant predictor of website satisfaction (R<sup>2</sup>=0.45, F<sub>2,67</sub>=28.16, P<.001), continuance intention (R<sup>2</sup>=0.34, F<sub>1,68</sub>=34.57, P<.001), and intention to recommend (R<sup>2</sup>=0.21, F<sub>1,68</sub>=19.02, P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The website has been evaluated positively and has proven useful for the target audience. Predictors of website acceptance and further use are contextual and depend on the website type.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e68365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/68365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/68365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全世界有5%到15%的儿童患有特定的学习障碍。这在父母和专业人士之间产生了大量的信息需求。LONDI (LONDI .de)是一个德语网站,它(1)提供有关学习障碍的循证信息,(2)为专业人员提供搜索相关诊断和干预措施的工具(帮助系统)。本文报告了对该网站的评价研究结果。目的:本研究的目的是(1)评估网站,(2)告知现有的技术接受度和用户满意度的理论。该研究采用了评估公共卫生影响的RE-AIM框架和信息系统延续意图框架。方法:这项混合方法观察性研究于2023年2月至2023年8月在德国在线进行。有学习困难的孩子的父母和学习治疗师参加了一个1.5小时的在线会议,他们在网站上得到指导。采用前后设计来评估参与者的知识、态度和自我效能的变化。此外,我们还测试了评估进一步使用意愿预测因素的两个路径模型(即继续使用意愿)和网站推荐意愿。第一个模型基于广泛使用的信息系统延续意向框架,测试了期望确认、感知有用性和网站满意度作为延续意向和网站推荐意向的预测因子。第二个模型关注可用性、内容感知、视觉美学和满意度作为相同结果变量的预测因子。结果:共有77名家长和73名学习治疗师参与了本研究。在学习治疗师样本中,年龄与可用性意见和网站满意度呈负相关。双尾t检验显示,两组儿童对学习障碍的认知均有显著提高(家长:t76=12.02, P71=7.03, P1,76=2.04, P= 0.14; Wilks lambda=0.95),但学习治疗师的认知有显著提高(F1,68=15.83, P2=0.59, f3143 =69.06, P2=0.45, f3143 =39.74, P2=0.45, F2,67=28.16, P2=0.34, F1,68=34.57, P2=0.21, F1,68=19.02, P)。结论:该网站评价良好,对目标受众有用。网站接受度和进一步使用的预测因素是相关的,取决于网站类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating a Website on Learning Disorders for Parents and Learning Therapists: Observational Mixed Methods Study.

Background: Between 5% and 15% of children worldwide have a specific learning disorder. This creates a substantial demand for information among both parents and professionals. LONDI (londi.de) is a German-language website that (1) provides evidence-based information on learning disorders and (2) offers a tool to search for relevant diagnostics and intervention measures for professionals (Help System). This paper reports the results of an evaluation study of the website.

Objective: The aim of the study was to (1) evaluate the website and (2) inform existing theories on technology acceptance and user satisfaction. The study was conducted using the RE-AIM framework for evaluating public health impact and the information system continuance intention framework.

Methods: This mixed methods observational study was conducted online from February 2023 to August 2023 in Germany. Parents of children with learning difficulties and learning therapists participated in a 1.5-hour online session in which they were guided through the website. A pre-post design was used to assess changes in participants' knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy. Additionally, two path models assessing the predicting factors of the intention to further use (ie, continuance intention) and the intention to recommend the website were tested. The first model was based on the widely used information system continuance intention framework and tested expectations confirmation, perceived usefulness, and website satisfaction as predictors of the continuance intention and the intention to recommend the website. The second model focused on usability, content perception, visual aesthetics, and satisfaction as predictors of the same outcome variables.

Results: A total of 77 parents and 73 learning therapists participated in the study. In the sample of learning therapists, age correlated negatively with usability opinion and website satisfaction. A 2-tailed t test revealed a significant increase in knowledge about learning disorders in both groups (parents: t76=12.02, P<.001; learning therapists: t71=7.03, P<.001). There was no change in attitudes and self-efficacy in parents (F1,76=2.04, P=.14; Wilks lambda=0.95), but there was a significant change for learning therapists (F1,68=15.83, P<.001; Wilks lambda=0.68) after using the website. A path analysis revealed that the intention to recommend the website can be included as an additional variable in the information system continuance intention framework. For the informational pages, content perception and visual aesthetics significantly predicted website satisfaction (R2=0.59, F3,143=69.06, P<.001), and content perception significantly predicted continuance intention (R2=0.45, F3,143=39.74, P<.001). For the Help System, usability was the only significant predictor of website satisfaction (R2=0.45, F2,67=28.16, P<.001), continuance intention (R2=0.34, F1,68=34.57, P<.001), and intention to recommend (R2=0.21, F1,68=19.02, P<.001).

Conclusions: The website has been evaluated positively and has proven useful for the target audience. Predictors of website acceptance and further use are contextual and depend on the website type.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信