慢性疾病妇女避孕选择的在线辅助决策:一项系统综述。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Begashaw Melaku Gebresillassie, Nicole Doley, Melissa L Harris
{"title":"慢性疾病妇女避孕选择的在线辅助决策:一项系统综述。","authors":"Begashaw Melaku Gebresillassie, Nicole Doley, Melissa L Harris","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women with chronic conditions face increased risks of unintended pregnancy and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Tailored, online contraceptive decision aids might improve informed decision-making and support reproductive health by promoting patient-centered care in this population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study systematically reviews the characteristics and effectiveness of online decision aids designed to support contraceptive and reproductive health choices in women with chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care Database, and Emcare up until November 30, 2024, using terms related to contraception, decision aids, chronic conditions, and women's health. We also searched thesis repositories and reference lists of relevant reviews.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Included studies evaluated web-based decision aids with a contraceptive choice component, targeted women of reproductive age (15-50 years) with chronic conditions, and assessed outcomes related to feasibility, user experience, knowledge, communication, or contraceptive uptake and behavior change.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, intervention features, and outcomes and assessed methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A narrative synthesis was conducted due to heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes. The GRADE approach was not applied to assess the quality of the included studies due to variability in study designs and outcomes. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023473313).</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Ten studies evaluating nine distinct decision aids met the inclusion criteria. Eight focused primarily on contraceptive choices, while two addressed broader reproductive health planning. Most studies were conducted in the USA (n = 8) and employed various designs: randomized controlled trials (n = 4), mixed-methods studies (n = 2), and descriptive studies (n = 3). The decision aids targeted various chronic conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, cancer, rheumatic diseases, cystic fibrosis, and sickle cell disease. The aids incorporated interactive features, personalized recommendations, and multimedia formats, with high user satisfaction and usability ratings reported. Some decision aids demonstrated improvements in contraceptive use, reproductive health knowledge, and communication. However, the effect on long-term contraceptive behaviors was mixed, with three studies showing positive but not statistically significant changes and one study reporting a negative correlation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online decision aids tailored for women with chronic conditions showed promise in improving user satisfaction, reproductive health knowledge, and patient-provider communication. However, their impact on long-term contraceptive behaviors remains inconclusive. Future studies should employ rigorous designs, validated outcome measures, and larger, more diverse populations to further evaluate the effectiveness of these aids and optimize their impact on contraceptive decision-making in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online decision aids for contraceptive choices in women with chronic conditions: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Begashaw Melaku Gebresillassie, Nicole Doley, Melissa L Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.70555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women with chronic conditions face increased risks of unintended pregnancy and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Tailored, online contraceptive decision aids might improve informed decision-making and support reproductive health by promoting patient-centered care in this population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study systematically reviews the characteristics and effectiveness of online decision aids designed to support contraceptive and reproductive health choices in women with chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care Database, and Emcare up until November 30, 2024, using terms related to contraception, decision aids, chronic conditions, and women's health. We also searched thesis repositories and reference lists of relevant reviews.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Included studies evaluated web-based decision aids with a contraceptive choice component, targeted women of reproductive age (15-50 years) with chronic conditions, and assessed outcomes related to feasibility, user experience, knowledge, communication, or contraceptive uptake and behavior change.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, intervention features, and outcomes and assessed methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A narrative synthesis was conducted due to heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes. The GRADE approach was not applied to assess the quality of the included studies due to variability in study designs and outcomes. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023473313).</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Ten studies evaluating nine distinct decision aids met the inclusion criteria. Eight focused primarily on contraceptive choices, while two addressed broader reproductive health planning. Most studies were conducted in the USA (n = 8) and employed various designs: randomized controlled trials (n = 4), mixed-methods studies (n = 2), and descriptive studies (n = 3). The decision aids targeted various chronic conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, cancer, rheumatic diseases, cystic fibrosis, and sickle cell disease. The aids incorporated interactive features, personalized recommendations, and multimedia formats, with high user satisfaction and usability ratings reported. Some decision aids demonstrated improvements in contraceptive use, reproductive health knowledge, and communication. However, the effect on long-term contraceptive behaviors was mixed, with three studies showing positive but not statistically significant changes and one study reporting a negative correlation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online decision aids tailored for women with chronic conditions showed promise in improving user satisfaction, reproductive health knowledge, and patient-provider communication. However, their impact on long-term contraceptive behaviors remains inconclusive. Future studies should employ rigorous designs, validated outcome measures, and larger, more diverse populations to further evaluate the effectiveness of these aids and optimize their impact on contraceptive decision-making in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70555\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患有慢性疾病的妇女面临意外妊娠和不良孕产妇及围产期结局的风险增加。量身定制的在线避孕决策辅助工具可以通过促进以患者为中心的护理来改善知情决策并支持生殖健康。目的:本研究系统地回顾了在线决策辅助的特点和有效性,旨在支持慢性疾病妇女的避孕和生殖健康选择。检索策略:我们检索了Medline、Embase、CINAHL、妇幼保健数据库和Emcare,检索时间截止到2024年11月30日,检索了与避孕、辅助决策、慢性病和妇女健康相关的术语。我们还检索了相关综述的论文库和参考文献列表。选择标准:纳入的研究评估了具有避孕选择成分的基于网络的决策辅助工具,目标是患有慢性疾病的育龄妇女(15-50岁),并评估了与可行性、用户体验、知识、沟通或避孕摄入和行为改变相关的结果。数据收集和分析:两位评论者独立提取研究特征、干预特征和结果的数据,并使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)评估方法学质量。由于研究设计和结果的异质性,进行了叙事综合。由于研究设计和结果的可变性,GRADE方法未用于评估纳入研究的质量。该协议已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023473313)。主要结果:10项研究评估了9种不同的决策辅助工具,符合纳入标准。8项主要侧重于避孕选择,2项涉及更广泛的生殖健康计划。大多数研究在美国进行(n = 8),采用各种设计:随机对照试验(n = 4),混合方法研究(n = 2)和描述性研究(n = 3)。该决定有助于针对各种慢性疾病,包括高血压、糖尿病、癌症、风湿病、囊性纤维化和镰状细胞病。这些辅助工具结合了互动功能、个性化推荐和多媒体格式,用户满意度和可用性评级都很高。一些决策辅助工具表明,在避孕药具使用、生殖健康知识和交流方面有所改善。然而,对长期避孕行为的影响好坏参半,有三项研究显示出积极但没有统计学意义的变化,有一项研究报告了负相关。结论:为患有慢性疾病的妇女量身定制的在线决策辅助工具在提高用户满意度、生殖健康知识和医患沟通方面显示出希望。然而,它们对长期避孕行为的影响仍不确定。未来的研究应采用严格的设计、有效的结果测量和更大、更多样化的人群来进一步评估这些辅助工具的有效性,并优化其对该人群中避孕决策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online decision aids for contraceptive choices in women with chronic conditions: A systematic review.

Background: Women with chronic conditions face increased risks of unintended pregnancy and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Tailored, online contraceptive decision aids might improve informed decision-making and support reproductive health by promoting patient-centered care in this population.

Objectives: This study systematically reviews the characteristics and effectiveness of online decision aids designed to support contraceptive and reproductive health choices in women with chronic conditions.

Search strategy: We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care Database, and Emcare up until November 30, 2024, using terms related to contraception, decision aids, chronic conditions, and women's health. We also searched thesis repositories and reference lists of relevant reviews.

Selection criteria: Included studies evaluated web-based decision aids with a contraceptive choice component, targeted women of reproductive age (15-50 years) with chronic conditions, and assessed outcomes related to feasibility, user experience, knowledge, communication, or contraceptive uptake and behavior change.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, intervention features, and outcomes and assessed methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A narrative synthesis was conducted due to heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes. The GRADE approach was not applied to assess the quality of the included studies due to variability in study designs and outcomes. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023473313).

Main results: Ten studies evaluating nine distinct decision aids met the inclusion criteria. Eight focused primarily on contraceptive choices, while two addressed broader reproductive health planning. Most studies were conducted in the USA (n = 8) and employed various designs: randomized controlled trials (n = 4), mixed-methods studies (n = 2), and descriptive studies (n = 3). The decision aids targeted various chronic conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, cancer, rheumatic diseases, cystic fibrosis, and sickle cell disease. The aids incorporated interactive features, personalized recommendations, and multimedia formats, with high user satisfaction and usability ratings reported. Some decision aids demonstrated improvements in contraceptive use, reproductive health knowledge, and communication. However, the effect on long-term contraceptive behaviors was mixed, with three studies showing positive but not statistically significant changes and one study reporting a negative correlation.

Conclusions: Online decision aids tailored for women with chronic conditions showed promise in improving user satisfaction, reproductive health knowledge, and patient-provider communication. However, their impact on long-term contraceptive behaviors remains inconclusive. Future studies should employ rigorous designs, validated outcome measures, and larger, more diverse populations to further evaluate the effectiveness of these aids and optimize their impact on contraceptive decision-making in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信