不同消毒方法对发芽藜麦面粉微生物品质及萌发效果的影响。

IF 5.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Foods Pub Date : 2025-09-13 DOI:10.3390/foods14183196
Silvia Melissa García-Torres, José António Teixeira, Christian R Encina-Zelada, Cristina L M Silva, Ana Maria Gomes
{"title":"不同消毒方法对发芽藜麦面粉微生物品质及萌发效果的影响。","authors":"Silvia Melissa García-Torres, José António Teixeira, Christian R Encina-Zelada, Cristina L M Silva, Ana Maria Gomes","doi":"10.3390/foods14183196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Grain processing requires sustainable and innovative alternatives. Germination, which enhances the nutritional value of grains, can also increase the microbial load, posing a challenge to food safety. In quinoa, a superfood with an exceptional nutritional profile, germination could maximize its benefits if proper methods are applied to ensure safety. The effects of different disinfection methods on mesophilic aerobic bacteria, enterobacteria, and the germination capacity of two Peruvian quinoa varieties (Rosada de Huancayo (RH) and Pasankalla (PK)) were evaluated for germinated flour production. Seven treatments were applied: four with chemical agents (200 ppm sodium hypochlorite, 4% acetic acid, 8% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, and 70% alcohol) and three combined methods (sodium hypochlorite with ultrasound (35 kHz, 15 or 30 min), and hot water (50 °C) with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (2%) and acetic acid (0.1%)). All treatments significantly reduced mesophilic aerobic bacteria (1.29-4.08 log CFU/g), except alcohol (PK, RH) and sodium hypochlorite (PK). Reductions in enterobacteria (<i>p</i> < 0.05) ranged from 1.78 to 3.55 log CFU/g in RH; in PK, only the hot water + 2 chemical agents or 8% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> treatments achieved significant reductions. The most effective treatment was hot water with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and acetic acid, which reduced bacteria and improved germination.</p>","PeriodicalId":12386,"journal":{"name":"Foods","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Different Disinfection Procedures on the Microbiological Quality and Germination Efficacy of Sprouted Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i>) Flour.\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Melissa García-Torres, José António Teixeira, Christian R Encina-Zelada, Cristina L M Silva, Ana Maria Gomes\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/foods14183196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Grain processing requires sustainable and innovative alternatives. Germination, which enhances the nutritional value of grains, can also increase the microbial load, posing a challenge to food safety. In quinoa, a superfood with an exceptional nutritional profile, germination could maximize its benefits if proper methods are applied to ensure safety. The effects of different disinfection methods on mesophilic aerobic bacteria, enterobacteria, and the germination capacity of two Peruvian quinoa varieties (Rosada de Huancayo (RH) and Pasankalla (PK)) were evaluated for germinated flour production. Seven treatments were applied: four with chemical agents (200 ppm sodium hypochlorite, 4% acetic acid, 8% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, and 70% alcohol) and three combined methods (sodium hypochlorite with ultrasound (35 kHz, 15 or 30 min), and hot water (50 °C) with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (2%) and acetic acid (0.1%)). All treatments significantly reduced mesophilic aerobic bacteria (1.29-4.08 log CFU/g), except alcohol (PK, RH) and sodium hypochlorite (PK). Reductions in enterobacteria (<i>p</i> < 0.05) ranged from 1.78 to 3.55 log CFU/g in RH; in PK, only the hot water + 2 chemical agents or 8% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> treatments achieved significant reductions. The most effective treatment was hot water with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and acetic acid, which reduced bacteria and improved germination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foods\",\"volume\":\"14 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468985/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14183196\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14183196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

粮食加工需要可持续和创新的替代品。发芽在提高谷物营养价值的同时,也会增加微生物负荷,对食品安全构成挑战。藜麦是一种具有特殊营养成分的超级食品,如果采用适当的方法来确保安全,萌发可以最大限度地发挥其益处。研究了不同消毒方法对两种秘鲁藜麦(Rosada de Huancayo, RH)和Pasankalla (PK)发芽面粉生产中嗜酸性好氧细菌、肠杆菌和萌发能力的影响。采用了七种处理方法:四种化学试剂(200ppm次氯酸钠、4%乙酸、8% H2O2和70%酒精)和三种组合方法(次氯酸钠加超声(35 kHz, 15或30分钟),热水(50°C)加H2O2(2%)和乙酸(0.1%))。除酒精(PK, RH)和次氯酸钠(PK)外,所有处理均显著降低了中嗜氧好氧细菌(1.29-4.08 log CFU/g)。RH中肠杆菌的减少幅度为1.78 ~ 3.55 log CFU/g (p < 0.05);在PK中,只有热水+ 2化学剂或8% H2O2处理能显著降低。以热水加H2O2和乙酸处理最有效,可减少细菌,提高萌发率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of Different Disinfection Procedures on the Microbiological Quality and Germination Efficacy of Sprouted Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i>) Flour.

Effect of Different Disinfection Procedures on the Microbiological Quality and Germination Efficacy of Sprouted Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i>) Flour.

Effect of Different Disinfection Procedures on the Microbiological Quality and Germination Efficacy of Sprouted Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i>) Flour.

Effect of Different Disinfection Procedures on the Microbiological Quality and Germination Efficacy of Sprouted Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) Flour.

Grain processing requires sustainable and innovative alternatives. Germination, which enhances the nutritional value of grains, can also increase the microbial load, posing a challenge to food safety. In quinoa, a superfood with an exceptional nutritional profile, germination could maximize its benefits if proper methods are applied to ensure safety. The effects of different disinfection methods on mesophilic aerobic bacteria, enterobacteria, and the germination capacity of two Peruvian quinoa varieties (Rosada de Huancayo (RH) and Pasankalla (PK)) were evaluated for germinated flour production. Seven treatments were applied: four with chemical agents (200 ppm sodium hypochlorite, 4% acetic acid, 8% H2O2, and 70% alcohol) and three combined methods (sodium hypochlorite with ultrasound (35 kHz, 15 or 30 min), and hot water (50 °C) with H2O2 (2%) and acetic acid (0.1%)). All treatments significantly reduced mesophilic aerobic bacteria (1.29-4.08 log CFU/g), except alcohol (PK, RH) and sodium hypochlorite (PK). Reductions in enterobacteria (p < 0.05) ranged from 1.78 to 3.55 log CFU/g in RH; in PK, only the hot water + 2 chemical agents or 8% H2O2 treatments achieved significant reductions. The most effective treatment was hot water with H2O2 and acetic acid, which reduced bacteria and improved germination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foods
Foods Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
3516
审稿时长
15.83 days
期刊介绍: Foods (ISSN 2304-8158) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of food research. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists, researchers, and other food professionals to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible or share their knowledge with as much readers unlimitedly as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal: Ÿ manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed Ÿ electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material Ÿ we also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信