新西兰奥特罗瓦地区经穿刺无缝合线主动脉瓣置换术的中期疗效。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Navneet Singh, Hannah Kim, Parma Nand
{"title":"新西兰奥特罗瓦地区经穿刺无缝合线主动脉瓣置换术的中期疗效。","authors":"Navneet Singh, Hannah Kim, Parma Nand","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Perceval bioprosthesis is a contemporary sutureless technology utilised for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Perceval valves allow for AVR with reduced cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, which correlates with improved postoperative patient morbidity and mortality. However, there is a paucity of literature reporting the medium-term outcomes from Perceval AVR in New Zealand. We aimed to investigate the mid-term outcomes from Perceval AVR at our single centre.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>All consecutive patients undergoing Perceval AVR (during isolated or combined procedures) at our unit from March 2011 to August 2021 were retrospectively analysed from a prospectively-collected database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the 10-year study period, 145 patients (mean age: 73.2 years; males: 71.7%; mean EuroSCORE II: 3.78%) underwent Perceval AVR. The most common indication for surgery was aortic stenosis (82.5%). The operative caseload was complex, with only 27.6% of patients undergoing first-time isolated AVR. The mean crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 74.7±40.6 and 111.3±63.6 minutes respectively. Latest follow-up transthoracic echocardiography (performed at a mean of 2.2±1.7 years postoperatively) revealed that 96% of patients had either none or only trivial paravalvular/transvalvular leaks. The 30-day mortality and stroke rates were 6.2% and 2.1% respectively. Medium-term survival rates across 5-year and 9.5-year follow-up were 70% and 55% respectively. There was only one reoperation on the aortic valve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across an older patient population undergoing complex cardiac surgery, Perceval AVR facilitates acceptable short-term and medium-term outcomes in terms of both prosthetic valvular function and survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medium-Term Outcomes of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement in Aotearoa New Zealand.\",\"authors\":\"Navneet Singh, Hannah Kim, Parma Nand\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Perceval bioprosthesis is a contemporary sutureless technology utilised for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Perceval valves allow for AVR with reduced cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, which correlates with improved postoperative patient morbidity and mortality. However, there is a paucity of literature reporting the medium-term outcomes from Perceval AVR in New Zealand. We aimed to investigate the mid-term outcomes from Perceval AVR at our single centre.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>All consecutive patients undergoing Perceval AVR (during isolated or combined procedures) at our unit from March 2011 to August 2021 were retrospectively analysed from a prospectively-collected database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the 10-year study period, 145 patients (mean age: 73.2 years; males: 71.7%; mean EuroSCORE II: 3.78%) underwent Perceval AVR. The most common indication for surgery was aortic stenosis (82.5%). The operative caseload was complex, with only 27.6% of patients undergoing first-time isolated AVR. The mean crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 74.7±40.6 and 111.3±63.6 minutes respectively. Latest follow-up transthoracic echocardiography (performed at a mean of 2.2±1.7 years postoperatively) revealed that 96% of patients had either none or only trivial paravalvular/transvalvular leaks. The 30-day mortality and stroke rates were 6.2% and 2.1% respectively. Medium-term survival rates across 5-year and 9.5-year follow-up were 70% and 55% respectively. There was only one reoperation on the aortic valve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across an older patient population undergoing complex cardiac surgery, Perceval AVR facilitates acceptable short-term and medium-term outcomes in terms of both prosthetic valvular function and survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.06.005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.06.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Perceval生物假体是一种用于外科主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的现代无缝线技术。前置瓣膜允许AVR减少交叉钳夹和体外循环次数,这与术后患者发病率和死亡率的改善有关。然而,在新西兰,报告Perceval AVR中期结果的文献很少。我们的目的是在我们的单中心调查Perceval AVR的中期结果。方法:回顾性分析2011年3月至2021年8月在我单位连续接受pereval AVR(单独或联合手术)的所有患者。结果:在10年的研究期间,145例患者(平均年龄:73.2岁,男性:71.7%,平均EuroSCORE II: 3.78%)接受了Perceval AVR。最常见的手术指征是主动脉瓣狭窄(82.5%)。手术病例量很复杂,只有27.6%的患者首次接受了孤立性AVR。交叉钳夹和体外循环的平均时间分别为74.7±40.6分钟和111.3±63.6分钟。最新随访的经胸超声心动图(术后平均2.2±1.7年)显示,96%的患者没有或只有轻微的瓣旁/瓣外渗漏。30天死亡率和脑卒中发生率分别为6.2%和2.1%。5年和9.5年随访的中期生存率分别为70%和55%。只有一次主动脉瓣再手术。结论:在接受复杂心脏手术的老年患者群体中,Perceval AVR在人工瓣膜功能和生存方面促进了可接受的短期和中期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medium-Term Outcomes of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Background: The Perceval bioprosthesis is a contemporary sutureless technology utilised for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Perceval valves allow for AVR with reduced cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, which correlates with improved postoperative patient morbidity and mortality. However, there is a paucity of literature reporting the medium-term outcomes from Perceval AVR in New Zealand. We aimed to investigate the mid-term outcomes from Perceval AVR at our single centre.

Method: All consecutive patients undergoing Perceval AVR (during isolated or combined procedures) at our unit from March 2011 to August 2021 were retrospectively analysed from a prospectively-collected database.

Results: Across the 10-year study period, 145 patients (mean age: 73.2 years; males: 71.7%; mean EuroSCORE II: 3.78%) underwent Perceval AVR. The most common indication for surgery was aortic stenosis (82.5%). The operative caseload was complex, with only 27.6% of patients undergoing first-time isolated AVR. The mean crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 74.7±40.6 and 111.3±63.6 minutes respectively. Latest follow-up transthoracic echocardiography (performed at a mean of 2.2±1.7 years postoperatively) revealed that 96% of patients had either none or only trivial paravalvular/transvalvular leaks. The 30-day mortality and stroke rates were 6.2% and 2.1% respectively. Medium-term survival rates across 5-year and 9.5-year follow-up were 70% and 55% respectively. There was only one reoperation on the aortic valve.

Conclusions: Across an older patient population undergoing complex cardiac surgery, Perceval AVR facilitates acceptable short-term and medium-term outcomes in terms of both prosthetic valvular function and survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信