干预措施对儿童和青少年自我伤害的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Björn Axel Johansson, Karin Wilbe Ramsay, Agneta Pettersson, Johan Bjureberg
{"title":"干预措施对儿童和青少年自我伤害的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Björn Axel Johansson, Karin Wilbe Ramsay, Agneta Pettersson, Johan Bjureberg","doi":"10.1007/s00787-025-02859-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-harm, including nonsuicidal self-injury and suicide attempts, is common among youth, associated with elevated psychopathology, suicide risk, and increased demand for clinical services. Despite advances in understanding and treatment, few interventions have demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which are considered the gold standard for evaluating treatment effects by randomly assigning participants to intervention or control groups. Building on prior meta-analyses, this study conducted a meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of interventions in adolescents across three outcomes: self-harm regardless of suicidal intent, suicide attempts, and nonsuicidal self-injury. Systematic searches in PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline identified RCTs evaluating interventions for self-harm in youth under 18 years who engaged in self-harm at least once in the past six months. Studies were included if 80% met these criteria. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects modeling, primarily to account for heterogeneity across studies, as this approach accommodates variation in effect sizes that may arise from differences in for example study populations, and interventions. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Of 6497 screened records, 21 studies met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that across three studies, Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) reduced the number of adolescents engaging in self-harm behaviors (risk difference [RD]=-0.12, 95% confidence interval: - 0.22 to - 0.02), with moderate certainty. Meta-analysis of two studies found Internet-delivered Emotion Regulation Individual Therapy for Adolescents (IERITA) reduced both the episodes (mean difference =-4.65, - 8.04 to - 1.25) and occurrence of nonsuicidal self-injury at treatment end (RD=-0.20, - 0.34 to - 0.07), with low certainty of evidence. DBT-A appears effective in preventing repeated self-harm, supported by findings across multiple research groups. The less resource-intensive therapy IERITA may be beneficial for adolescents with nonsuicidal self-injury. Larger sample sizes and consensus on definitions and measurement approaches will benefit future research and clinical practice.Prospero registration: ID CRD42023480178.</p>","PeriodicalId":11856,"journal":{"name":"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Björn Axel Johansson, Karin Wilbe Ramsay, Agneta Pettersson, Johan Bjureberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00787-025-02859-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Self-harm, including nonsuicidal self-injury and suicide attempts, is common among youth, associated with elevated psychopathology, suicide risk, and increased demand for clinical services. Despite advances in understanding and treatment, few interventions have demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which are considered the gold standard for evaluating treatment effects by randomly assigning participants to intervention or control groups. Building on prior meta-analyses, this study conducted a meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of interventions in adolescents across three outcomes: self-harm regardless of suicidal intent, suicide attempts, and nonsuicidal self-injury. Systematic searches in PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline identified RCTs evaluating interventions for self-harm in youth under 18 years who engaged in self-harm at least once in the past six months. Studies were included if 80% met these criteria. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects modeling, primarily to account for heterogeneity across studies, as this approach accommodates variation in effect sizes that may arise from differences in for example study populations, and interventions. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Of 6497 screened records, 21 studies met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that across three studies, Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) reduced the number of adolescents engaging in self-harm behaviors (risk difference [RD]=-0.12, 95% confidence interval: - 0.22 to - 0.02), with moderate certainty. Meta-analysis of two studies found Internet-delivered Emotion Regulation Individual Therapy for Adolescents (IERITA) reduced both the episodes (mean difference =-4.65, - 8.04 to - 1.25) and occurrence of nonsuicidal self-injury at treatment end (RD=-0.20, - 0.34 to - 0.07), with low certainty of evidence. DBT-A appears effective in preventing repeated self-harm, supported by findings across multiple research groups. The less resource-intensive therapy IERITA may be beneficial for adolescents with nonsuicidal self-injury. Larger sample sizes and consensus on definitions and measurement approaches will benefit future research and clinical practice.Prospero registration: ID CRD42023480178.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-025-02859-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-025-02859-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自残,包括非自杀性自残和自杀企图,在青少年中很常见,与精神病理升高、自杀风险和临床服务需求增加有关。尽管在理解和治疗方面取得了进展,但很少有干预措施在随机对照试验(rct)中显示出疗效,随机对照试验被认为是通过将参与者随机分配到干预组或对照组来评估治疗效果的金标准。在先前的荟萃分析的基础上,本研究对随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析,以评估干预措施对青少年的效果,包括三种结果:与自杀意图无关的自残、自杀未遂和非自杀性自残。在PsycINFO、Cochrane图书馆、Embase和Medline中进行系统搜索,确定了评估干预措施的随机对照试验,这些干预措施针对在过去六个月内至少有一次自残行为的18岁以下青少年。如果80%的研究符合这些标准,则纳入研究。使用随机效应模型进行meta分析,主要是为了解释研究之间的异质性,因为这种方法可以适应可能由研究人群和干预措施的差异引起的效应大小的变化。使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。在6497份筛选记录中,21项研究符合纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,在三项研究中,辩证行为疗法(DBT)减少了青少年从事自残行为的数量(风险差异[RD]=-0.12, 95%可信区间:- 0.22至- 0.02),具有中等确定性。两项研究的荟萃分析发现,互联网提供的青少年情绪调节个体治疗(IERITA)减少了治疗结束时非自杀性自伤的发生率(平均差异=-4.65,- 8.04至- 1.25)和发生率(RD=-0.20, - 0.34至- 0.07),证据确定性较低。DBT-A似乎在防止重复的自我伤害方面有效,这得到了多个研究小组的研究结果的支持。较少资源密集治疗IERITA可能有利于青少年非自杀性自伤。更大的样本量和对定义和测量方法的共识将有利于未来的研究和临床实践。普洛斯彼罗注册:ID CRD42023480178。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Self-harm, including nonsuicidal self-injury and suicide attempts, is common among youth, associated with elevated psychopathology, suicide risk, and increased demand for clinical services. Despite advances in understanding and treatment, few interventions have demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which are considered the gold standard for evaluating treatment effects by randomly assigning participants to intervention or control groups. Building on prior meta-analyses, this study conducted a meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of interventions in adolescents across three outcomes: self-harm regardless of suicidal intent, suicide attempts, and nonsuicidal self-injury. Systematic searches in PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline identified RCTs evaluating interventions for self-harm in youth under 18 years who engaged in self-harm at least once in the past six months. Studies were included if 80% met these criteria. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects modeling, primarily to account for heterogeneity across studies, as this approach accommodates variation in effect sizes that may arise from differences in for example study populations, and interventions. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Of 6497 screened records, 21 studies met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that across three studies, Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) reduced the number of adolescents engaging in self-harm behaviors (risk difference [RD]=-0.12, 95% confidence interval: - 0.22 to - 0.02), with moderate certainty. Meta-analysis of two studies found Internet-delivered Emotion Regulation Individual Therapy for Adolescents (IERITA) reduced both the episodes (mean difference =-4.65, - 8.04 to - 1.25) and occurrence of nonsuicidal self-injury at treatment end (RD=-0.20, - 0.34 to - 0.07), with low certainty of evidence. DBT-A appears effective in preventing repeated self-harm, supported by findings across multiple research groups. The less resource-intensive therapy IERITA may be beneficial for adolescents with nonsuicidal self-injury. Larger sample sizes and consensus on definitions and measurement approaches will benefit future research and clinical practice.Prospero registration: ID CRD42023480178.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry is Europe''s only peer-reviewed journal entirely devoted to child and adolescent psychiatry. It aims to further a broad understanding of psychopathology in children and adolescents. Empirical research is its foundation, and clinical relevance is its hallmark. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry welcomes in particular papers covering neuropsychiatry, cognitive neuroscience, genetics, neuroimaging, pharmacology, and related fields of interest. Contributions are encouraged from all around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信