前后路手术入路对脊髓型颈椎病患者足底压力分布的短期和长期影响。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Xuhong Zhang, Zichuan Wu, Junzhe Sheng, Xingyu Li, Aochen Xu, Junbin Liu, Hanlin Song, Baifeng Sun, Chen Xu, Min Qi, Yang Liu
{"title":"前后路手术入路对脊髓型颈椎病患者足底压力分布的短期和长期影响。","authors":"Xuhong Zhang, Zichuan Wu, Junzhe Sheng, Xingyu Li, Aochen Xu, Junbin Liu, Hanlin Song, Baifeng Sun, Chen Xu, Min Qi, Yang Liu","doi":"10.1186/s40001-025-03161-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the short-term and long-term effects of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) versus posterior open-door laminoplasty on plantar pressure distribution in patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 156 CSM patients admitted between January 2020 and December 2022 were enrolled and divided into an ACDF group (n = 82) and a posterior open-door group (n = 74) based on surgical approach. Plantar pressure data (medial foot pressure, lateral foot pressure, forefoot pressure, rearfoot pressure) were collected preoperatively, at 6 months postoperatively, and at 2 years postoperatively. Concurrent assessments included the mJOA score, Nurick grade, and radiographic parameters (Maximum Spinal Cord Compression ratio, Compression Ratio, Spinal Cord Occupation Ratio).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences existed in preoperative plantar pressure or clinical indicators between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, medial foot pressure in the ACDF group decreased significantly from (45.21 ± 6.32) % to (38.76 ± 5.14)%, outperforming the posterior group (42.35 ± 5.87)% (P < 0.01). Lateral foot pressure increased to (57.23 ± 4.98)% in the ACDF group versus (55.12 ± 5.36)% in the posterior group (P < 0.05). At 2 years postoperatively, lateral foot pressure in the posterior group further increased to (59.47 ± 5.02)%, partially surpassing the ACDF group (58.15 ± 4.79)% (P = 0.036). However, medial foot pressure improvement remained significantly greater in the ACDF group (36.54 ± 4.82 vs. 39.21 ± 5.16, P < 0.01). Forefoot pressure increased significantly in both groups at 2 years (P < 0.05), while rearfoot pressure showed no significant difference. The ACDF group demonstrated superior improvement in mJOA score (5.21 ± 1.34 vs. 3.89 ± 1.27, P < 0.01) and Nurick grade.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACDF surgery provides faster and more sustained improvement in medial plantar pressure for CSM patients, correlating with its direct relief of ventral spinal cord compression and restoration of proprioceptive conduction. Posterior surgery may optimize lateral foot pressure through long-term biomechanical compensation of spinal stability, but overall functional recovery is less pronounced compared to the anterior approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"875"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-term and long-term effects of anterior and posterior surgical approaches on plantar pressure distribution in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Xuhong Zhang, Zichuan Wu, Junzhe Sheng, Xingyu Li, Aochen Xu, Junbin Liu, Hanlin Song, Baifeng Sun, Chen Xu, Min Qi, Yang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40001-025-03161-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the short-term and long-term effects of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) versus posterior open-door laminoplasty on plantar pressure distribution in patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 156 CSM patients admitted between January 2020 and December 2022 were enrolled and divided into an ACDF group (n = 82) and a posterior open-door group (n = 74) based on surgical approach. Plantar pressure data (medial foot pressure, lateral foot pressure, forefoot pressure, rearfoot pressure) were collected preoperatively, at 6 months postoperatively, and at 2 years postoperatively. Concurrent assessments included the mJOA score, Nurick grade, and radiographic parameters (Maximum Spinal Cord Compression ratio, Compression Ratio, Spinal Cord Occupation Ratio).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences existed in preoperative plantar pressure or clinical indicators between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, medial foot pressure in the ACDF group decreased significantly from (45.21 ± 6.32) % to (38.76 ± 5.14)%, outperforming the posterior group (42.35 ± 5.87)% (P < 0.01). Lateral foot pressure increased to (57.23 ± 4.98)% in the ACDF group versus (55.12 ± 5.36)% in the posterior group (P < 0.05). At 2 years postoperatively, lateral foot pressure in the posterior group further increased to (59.47 ± 5.02)%, partially surpassing the ACDF group (58.15 ± 4.79)% (P = 0.036). However, medial foot pressure improvement remained significantly greater in the ACDF group (36.54 ± 4.82 vs. 39.21 ± 5.16, P < 0.01). Forefoot pressure increased significantly in both groups at 2 years (P < 0.05), while rearfoot pressure showed no significant difference. The ACDF group demonstrated superior improvement in mJOA score (5.21 ± 1.34 vs. 3.89 ± 1.27, P < 0.01) and Nurick grade.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACDF surgery provides faster and more sustained improvement in medial plantar pressure for CSM patients, correlating with its direct relief of ventral spinal cord compression and restoration of proprioceptive conduction. Posterior surgery may optimize lateral foot pressure through long-term biomechanical compensation of spinal stability, but overall functional recovery is less pronounced compared to the anterior approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465588/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-03161-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-03161-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较颈椎病(CSM)患者行前路颈椎椎间盘切除术融合术(ACDF)与后路开门椎板成形术对足底压力分布的短期和长期影响。方法:纳入2020年1月至2022年12月收治的156例CSM患者,根据手术入路分为ACDF组(n = 82)和后路开门组(n = 74)。术前、术后6个月和术后2年分别收集足底压力数据(内侧足压、外侧足压、前足压、后足压)。同时评估包括mJOA评分、Nurick分级和放射学参数(最大脊髓压缩比、压缩比、脊髓占用比)。结果:两组术前足底压力及临床指标差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。术后6个月,ACDF组内侧足压由(45.21±6.32)%明显下降至(38.76±5.14)%,优于后路组(42.35±5.87)%。(P)结论:ACDF手术对CSM患者内侧足底压力的改善更快、更持久,与其直接解除脊髓腹侧压迫和恢复本体感觉传导有关。后路手术可以通过脊柱稳定性的长期生物力学补偿来优化侧足压力,但与前路手术相比,整体功能恢复不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short-term and long-term effects of anterior and posterior surgical approaches on plantar pressure distribution in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Objective: To compare the short-term and long-term effects of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) versus posterior open-door laminoplasty on plantar pressure distribution in patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM).

Methods: A total of 156 CSM patients admitted between January 2020 and December 2022 were enrolled and divided into an ACDF group (n = 82) and a posterior open-door group (n = 74) based on surgical approach. Plantar pressure data (medial foot pressure, lateral foot pressure, forefoot pressure, rearfoot pressure) were collected preoperatively, at 6 months postoperatively, and at 2 years postoperatively. Concurrent assessments included the mJOA score, Nurick grade, and radiographic parameters (Maximum Spinal Cord Compression ratio, Compression Ratio, Spinal Cord Occupation Ratio).

Results: No significant differences existed in preoperative plantar pressure or clinical indicators between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, medial foot pressure in the ACDF group decreased significantly from (45.21 ± 6.32) % to (38.76 ± 5.14)%, outperforming the posterior group (42.35 ± 5.87)% (P < 0.01). Lateral foot pressure increased to (57.23 ± 4.98)% in the ACDF group versus (55.12 ± 5.36)% in the posterior group (P < 0.05). At 2 years postoperatively, lateral foot pressure in the posterior group further increased to (59.47 ± 5.02)%, partially surpassing the ACDF group (58.15 ± 4.79)% (P = 0.036). However, medial foot pressure improvement remained significantly greater in the ACDF group (36.54 ± 4.82 vs. 39.21 ± 5.16, P < 0.01). Forefoot pressure increased significantly in both groups at 2 years (P < 0.05), while rearfoot pressure showed no significant difference. The ACDF group demonstrated superior improvement in mJOA score (5.21 ± 1.34 vs. 3.89 ± 1.27, P < 0.01) and Nurick grade.

Conclusion: ACDF surgery provides faster and more sustained improvement in medial plantar pressure for CSM patients, correlating with its direct relief of ventral spinal cord compression and restoration of proprioceptive conduction. Posterior surgery may optimize lateral foot pressure through long-term biomechanical compensation of spinal stability, but overall functional recovery is less pronounced compared to the anterior approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信