原发性骨质疏松筛查工具(POST)在骨质疏松筛查中的表现:一项在中国的横断面研究。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yuchen Tang, Xin Hu, Wen Dong, Jun Qin, Jianchuan Shu, Jiaxin Kuang, Qiufu Wang, Guanyin Jiang, Miao Lei, Yongle Wu, Jie Hao, Zhenming Hu
{"title":"原发性骨质疏松筛查工具(POST)在骨质疏松筛查中的表现:一项在中国的横断面研究。","authors":"Yuchen Tang, Xin Hu, Wen Dong, Jun Qin, Jianchuan Shu, Jiaxin Kuang, Qiufu Wang, Guanyin Jiang, Miao Lei, Yongle Wu, Jie Hao, Zhenming Hu","doi":"10.1186/s40001-025-03104-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the Primary Osteoporosis Screening Tool (POST) in identifying osteoporosis among Chinese adults aged 50 years and older.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study consecutively included patients from the University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Osteoporosis was defined based on the T-scores of femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) or lumbar spine BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations. The POST scores were computed according to the subject information on age, sex, and weight. In addition, the performance of the POST was assessed and compared with the Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2861 patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 78.43% were women, with a mean age of 65.67 ± 9.81 years. The POST exhibited superior performance compared to OSTA in osteoporosis screening, as evidenced by a higher area under curve, enhanced NRI/IDI metrics, and remarkable sensitivity. Subgroup analysis further highlighted the superior efficacy of POST in individuals aged 65 years and older. Additionally, sensitivity analysis confirmed that the POST maintained robust performance in identifying individuals with osteoporosis, even after the exclusion of underweight patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The POST has been shown to be an effective instrument for osteoporosis screening among Chinese adults. Nonetheless, this study has limitations including its single-center retrospective design and imbalanced gender distribution, which may affect generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"861"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of the Primary Osteoporosis Screening Tool (POST) in osteoporosis screening: a cross-sectional study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Yuchen Tang, Xin Hu, Wen Dong, Jun Qin, Jianchuan Shu, Jiaxin Kuang, Qiufu Wang, Guanyin Jiang, Miao Lei, Yongle Wu, Jie Hao, Zhenming Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40001-025-03104-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the Primary Osteoporosis Screening Tool (POST) in identifying osteoporosis among Chinese adults aged 50 years and older.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study consecutively included patients from the University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Osteoporosis was defined based on the T-scores of femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) or lumbar spine BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations. The POST scores were computed according to the subject information on age, sex, and weight. In addition, the performance of the POST was assessed and compared with the Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2861 patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 78.43% were women, with a mean age of 65.67 ± 9.81 years. The POST exhibited superior performance compared to OSTA in osteoporosis screening, as evidenced by a higher area under curve, enhanced NRI/IDI metrics, and remarkable sensitivity. Subgroup analysis further highlighted the superior efficacy of POST in individuals aged 65 years and older. Additionally, sensitivity analysis confirmed that the POST maintained robust performance in identifying individuals with osteoporosis, even after the exclusion of underweight patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The POST has been shown to be an effective instrument for osteoporosis screening among Chinese adults. Nonetheless, this study has limitations including its single-center retrospective design and imbalanced gender distribution, which may affect generalizability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"861\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465849/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-03104-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-03104-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估原发性骨质疏松筛查工具(POST)在中国50岁及以上成人骨质疏松症诊断中的疗效。方法:采用回顾性横断面研究,连续纳入重庆医科大学大学城医院的患者。根据双能x线骨密度检查的股骨颈骨密度(BMD)或腰椎骨密度t评分来定义骨质疏松症。POST分数是根据受试者的年龄、性别和体重信息计算的。此外,通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积、净重分类改善(NRI)、综合歧视改善(IDI)对POST的性能进行评估,并与亚洲人骨质疏松症自我评估工具(OSTA)进行比较。结果:共2861例患者纳入最终分析,其中78.43%为女性,平均年龄65.67±9.81岁。与OSTA相比,POST在骨质疏松筛查方面表现出更好的性能,这可以通过更高的曲线下面积、增强的NRI/IDI指标和显著的灵敏度来证明。亚组分析进一步强调了POST在65岁及以上人群中的优越疗效。此外,敏感性分析证实,即使在排除体重过轻的患者后,POST在识别骨质疏松症患者方面仍保持着强大的性能。结论:POST已被证明是中国成人骨质疏松症筛查的有效工具。然而,本研究存在局限性,包括单中心回顾性设计和性别分布不平衡,这可能影响通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of the Primary Osteoporosis Screening Tool (POST) in osteoporosis screening: a cross-sectional study in China.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the Primary Osteoporosis Screening Tool (POST) in identifying osteoporosis among Chinese adults aged 50 years and older.

Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study consecutively included patients from the University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Osteoporosis was defined based on the T-scores of femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) or lumbar spine BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations. The POST scores were computed according to the subject information on age, sex, and weight. In addition, the performance of the POST was assessed and compared with the Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

Results: A total of 2861 patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 78.43% were women, with a mean age of 65.67 ± 9.81 years. The POST exhibited superior performance compared to OSTA in osteoporosis screening, as evidenced by a higher area under curve, enhanced NRI/IDI metrics, and remarkable sensitivity. Subgroup analysis further highlighted the superior efficacy of POST in individuals aged 65 years and older. Additionally, sensitivity analysis confirmed that the POST maintained robust performance in identifying individuals with osteoporosis, even after the exclusion of underweight patients.

Conclusions: The POST has been shown to be an effective instrument for osteoporosis screening among Chinese adults. Nonetheless, this study has limitations including its single-center retrospective design and imbalanced gender distribution, which may affect generalizability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信