相对熵的单调性:Petz和Uhlmann方法的比较研究。

IF 2 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Entropy Pub Date : 2025-09-14 DOI:10.3390/e27090954
Santiago Matheus, Francesco Bottacin, Edoardo Provenzi
{"title":"相对熵的单调性:Petz和Uhlmann方法的比较研究。","authors":"Santiago Matheus, Francesco Bottacin, Edoardo Provenzi","doi":"10.3390/e27090954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We revisit the monotonicity of relative entropy under the action of quantum channels, a foundational result in quantum information theory. Among the several available proofs, we focus on those by Petz and Uhlmann, which we reformulate within a unified, finite-dimensional operator-theoretic framework. In the first part, we examine Petz's strategy, identify a subtle flaw in his original use of Jensen's contractive operator inequality, and point out how it was corrected to restore the validity of his line of reasoning. In the second part, we develop Uhlmann's approach, which is based on interpolations of positive sesquilinear forms and applies automatically to non-invertible density operators. By comparing these two approaches, we highlight their complementary strengths: Petz's method is more direct and clear; Uhlmann's method is more abstract and general. Our treatment aims to clarify the mathematical structure underlying the monotonicity of relative entropy and to make these proofs more accessible to a broader audience interested in both the foundations and applications of quantum information theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":11694,"journal":{"name":"Entropy","volume":"27 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Monotonicity of Relative Entropy: A Comparative Study of Petz's and Uhlmann's Approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Santiago Matheus, Francesco Bottacin, Edoardo Provenzi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/e27090954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We revisit the monotonicity of relative entropy under the action of quantum channels, a foundational result in quantum information theory. Among the several available proofs, we focus on those by Petz and Uhlmann, which we reformulate within a unified, finite-dimensional operator-theoretic framework. In the first part, we examine Petz's strategy, identify a subtle flaw in his original use of Jensen's contractive operator inequality, and point out how it was corrected to restore the validity of his line of reasoning. In the second part, we develop Uhlmann's approach, which is based on interpolations of positive sesquilinear forms and applies automatically to non-invertible density operators. By comparing these two approaches, we highlight their complementary strengths: Petz's method is more direct and clear; Uhlmann's method is more abstract and general. Our treatment aims to clarify the mathematical structure underlying the monotonicity of relative entropy and to make these proofs more accessible to a broader audience interested in both the foundations and applications of quantum information theory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Entropy\",\"volume\":\"27 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469047/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Entropy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/e27090954\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entropy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/e27090954","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们重新讨论了量子信道作用下相对熵的单调性,这是量子信息论的一个基本结果。在几个可用的证明中,我们重点关注Petz和Uhlmann的证明,我们在统一的有限维算子理论框架内重新表述。在第一部分中,我们研究佩茨的策略,找出他最初使用Jensen的收缩算子不等式的一个微妙缺陷,并指出如何纠正它以恢复他的推理路线的有效性。在第二部分中,我们发展了Uhlmann的方法,该方法基于正半线性形式的插值,并自动应用于非可逆密度算子。通过对两种方法的比较,我们突出了它们的互补优势:Petz的方法更直接、更清晰;乌尔曼的方法更加抽象和一般。我们的处理旨在澄清相对熵单调性背后的数学结构,并使对量子信息理论的基础和应用感兴趣的更广泛的受众更容易获得这些证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Monotonicity of Relative Entropy: A Comparative Study of Petz's and Uhlmann's Approaches.

We revisit the monotonicity of relative entropy under the action of quantum channels, a foundational result in quantum information theory. Among the several available proofs, we focus on those by Petz and Uhlmann, which we reformulate within a unified, finite-dimensional operator-theoretic framework. In the first part, we examine Petz's strategy, identify a subtle flaw in his original use of Jensen's contractive operator inequality, and point out how it was corrected to restore the validity of his line of reasoning. In the second part, we develop Uhlmann's approach, which is based on interpolations of positive sesquilinear forms and applies automatically to non-invertible density operators. By comparing these two approaches, we highlight their complementary strengths: Petz's method is more direct and clear; Uhlmann's method is more abstract and general. Our treatment aims to clarify the mathematical structure underlying the monotonicity of relative entropy and to make these proofs more accessible to a broader audience interested in both the foundations and applications of quantum information theory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Entropy
Entropy PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1580
审稿时长
21.05 days
期刊介绍: Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300), an international and interdisciplinary journal of entropy and information studies, publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish as much as possible their theoretical and experimental details. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. If there are computation and the experiment, the details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信