从检测到决策:t评分引导下CT后STIR MRI在椎体骨折中的应用。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Lior Yehuda Fitoussi, Árpád Viola, Siran Aslan, Réka Viola, Viktor Foglar, Mohammad Walid Al-Smadi
{"title":"从检测到决策:t评分引导下CT后STIR MRI在椎体骨折中的应用。","authors":"Lior Yehuda Fitoussi, Árpád Viola, Siran Aslan, Réka Viola, Viktor Foglar, Mohammad Walid Al-Smadi","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15182370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Vertebral fractures are frequently underdiagnosed after minor trauma in patients with normal or mildly reduced bone mineral density (BMD). CT, the standard first-line imaging, may miss subtle fractures, while STIR MRI is more sensitive but not routinely applied. We evaluated whether DEXA-derived T-scores can guide selective use of STIR MRI in patients > 50 years. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed 214 patients who underwent CT, sagittal whole-spine STIR MRI, and DEXA within 48 h after minor trauma. Fracture counts were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Spearman's correlation examined associations between T-score and fracture counts. Subgroups were defined as normal (≥-1), osteopenia (-2.5 < T-score < -1), osteoporosis (-3.5 < T-score ≤ -2.5), and high-risk osteoporosis (≤-3.5). <b>Results:</b> STIR MRI identified more fractures than CT in 87 patients (40.7%), while CT detected more in 19 (8.9%) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). MRI outperformed CT across all T-score categories. The osteopenia group had the highest number of additional fractures (<i>n</i> = 53), and even patients with normal BMD showed a notable yield (<i>n</i> = 36). Correlations between T-score and fracture counts were weak and not statistically significant. <b>Conclusions:</b> T-score can support imaging triage but should not be used as a strict threshold. STIR MRI is justified in patients with T-scores < -2.5 when clinical suspicion exists and should be considered in those with higher T-scores if CT is negative but symptoms persist. Integrating T-score into imaging protocols may reduce missed fractures and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Detection to Decision: T-Score-Guided Use of STIR MRI After CT in Vertebral Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Lior Yehuda Fitoussi, Árpád Viola, Siran Aslan, Réka Viola, Viktor Foglar, Mohammad Walid Al-Smadi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15182370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Vertebral fractures are frequently underdiagnosed after minor trauma in patients with normal or mildly reduced bone mineral density (BMD). CT, the standard first-line imaging, may miss subtle fractures, while STIR MRI is more sensitive but not routinely applied. We evaluated whether DEXA-derived T-scores can guide selective use of STIR MRI in patients > 50 years. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed 214 patients who underwent CT, sagittal whole-spine STIR MRI, and DEXA within 48 h after minor trauma. Fracture counts were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Spearman's correlation examined associations between T-score and fracture counts. Subgroups were defined as normal (≥-1), osteopenia (-2.5 < T-score < -1), osteoporosis (-3.5 < T-score ≤ -2.5), and high-risk osteoporosis (≤-3.5). <b>Results:</b> STIR MRI identified more fractures than CT in 87 patients (40.7%), while CT detected more in 19 (8.9%) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). MRI outperformed CT across all T-score categories. The osteopenia group had the highest number of additional fractures (<i>n</i> = 53), and even patients with normal BMD showed a notable yield (<i>n</i> = 36). Correlations between T-score and fracture counts were weak and not statistically significant. <b>Conclusions:</b> T-score can support imaging triage but should not be used as a strict threshold. STIR MRI is justified in patients with T-scores < -2.5 when clinical suspicion exists and should be considered in those with higher T-scores if CT is negative but symptoms persist. Integrating T-score into imaging protocols may reduce missed fractures and improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468972/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15182370\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15182370","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:骨矿物质密度(BMD)正常或轻度降低的轻微创伤患者椎体骨折经常被误诊。CT,标准的一线成像,可能会遗漏细微的骨折,而STIR MRI更敏感,但不常用。我们评估了dexa衍生的t评分是否可以指导50岁至50岁患者选择性使用STIR MRI。方法:我们回顾性分析了214例轻度创伤后48小时内接受CT、矢状面全脊柱STIR MRI和DEXA检查的患者。骨折计数采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行比较。Spearman的相关性研究了t评分和骨折计数之间的关系。亚组定义为正常(≥-1)、骨质减少(-2.5 < T-score < -1)、骨质疏松(-3.5 < T-score≤-2.5)和高危骨质疏松(≤-3.5)。结果:87例患者STIR MRI检出率高于CT(40.7%), 19例患者CT检出率高于CT (8.9%) (p < 0.0001)。MRI在所有t评分类别中都优于CT。骨质减少组有最多的额外骨折(n = 53),即使骨密度正常的患者也有显著的骨折发生率(n = 36)。t评分与骨折计数之间的相关性较弱,无统计学意义。结论:t评分可以支持影像分诊,但不应作为严格的阈值。当临床怀疑存在t评分< -2.5的患者时,STIR MRI是合理的,如果CT为阴性但症状持续存在,则应考虑对t评分较高的患者进行STIR MRI。将t评分整合到成像方案中可以减少骨折漏诊并改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Detection to Decision: T-Score-Guided Use of STIR MRI After CT in Vertebral Fractures.

Background/Objectives: Vertebral fractures are frequently underdiagnosed after minor trauma in patients with normal or mildly reduced bone mineral density (BMD). CT, the standard first-line imaging, may miss subtle fractures, while STIR MRI is more sensitive but not routinely applied. We evaluated whether DEXA-derived T-scores can guide selective use of STIR MRI in patients > 50 years. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 214 patients who underwent CT, sagittal whole-spine STIR MRI, and DEXA within 48 h after minor trauma. Fracture counts were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Spearman's correlation examined associations between T-score and fracture counts. Subgroups were defined as normal (≥-1), osteopenia (-2.5 < T-score < -1), osteoporosis (-3.5 < T-score ≤ -2.5), and high-risk osteoporosis (≤-3.5). Results: STIR MRI identified more fractures than CT in 87 patients (40.7%), while CT detected more in 19 (8.9%) (p < 0.0001). MRI outperformed CT across all T-score categories. The osteopenia group had the highest number of additional fractures (n = 53), and even patients with normal BMD showed a notable yield (n = 36). Correlations between T-score and fracture counts were weak and not statistically significant. Conclusions: T-score can support imaging triage but should not be used as a strict threshold. STIR MRI is justified in patients with T-scores < -2.5 when clinical suspicion exists and should be considered in those with higher T-scores if CT is negative but symptoms persist. Integrating T-score into imaging protocols may reduce missed fractures and improve outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信