首个关于LutatheraTM治疗胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤(GEP-NETs)安全性和有效性的真实证据:来自上市后监测的见解。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-09-13 DOI:10.3390/cancers17182992
Yong-Il Kim, Hoon Young Suh, Yehrim Kang, Hojin Cho, Seung Hyup Hyun, Yoo Sung Song, Seunggyun Ha, Keon Wook Kang
{"title":"首个关于LutatheraTM治疗胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤(GEP-NETs)安全性和有效性的真实证据:来自上市后监测的见解。","authors":"Yong-Il Kim, Hoon Young Suh, Yehrim Kang, Hojin Cho, Seung Hyup Hyun, Yoo Sung Song, Seunggyun Ha, Keon Wook Kang","doi":"10.3390/cancers17182992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> This post-marketing surveillance study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in patients with GEP-NETs in real-world practice in South Korea. <b>Methods:</b> From July 2020 to July 2024, a total of 89 patients from 6 institutions diagnosed with GEP-NETs, as outlined in the approved indication for [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, were enrolled. Safety was the primary objective, whereas effectiveness was a secondary objective. In this article, findings were analyzed and compared with the NETTER-1 and NETTER-2 trials. <b>Results:</b> Baseline characteristics were comparable to NETTER-1 and NETTER-2 except for the notably high proportion of G2 (77.1%) among participants. Less than half of patients (41.0%) completed four cycles of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE treatment, presenting a lower portion of completion rate compared to 75.7% in NETTER-1 and 87.8% in NETTER-2. Among the 83 patients, 60 patients (72.3%, 239 cases) had at least 1 AE, with 6 patients (7.2%, 8 cases) experiencing SAEs. The most common AE was nausea (34.9%, 46 cases), and most AEs were mild in severity (94.6%, 226 cases). Overall, the safety profile in this study presented minimal differences from NETTER-1 and NETTER-2. This study reports 37.7% of ORR which was between 14.7% in NETTER-1 and 43.0% in NETTER-2. <b>Conclusions:</b> This nationwide post-marketing surveillance study complemented the safety and effectiveness of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE among Koreans, which was not probed in two pivotal trials. The data would support the clinical implication of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE for the GEP-NETs treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First Real-World Evidence on the Safety and Effectiveness of Lutathera<sup>TM</sup> for Treating Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs): Insights from Post-Marketing Surveillance.\",\"authors\":\"Yong-Il Kim, Hoon Young Suh, Yehrim Kang, Hojin Cho, Seung Hyup Hyun, Yoo Sung Song, Seunggyun Ha, Keon Wook Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cancers17182992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> This post-marketing surveillance study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in patients with GEP-NETs in real-world practice in South Korea. <b>Methods:</b> From July 2020 to July 2024, a total of 89 patients from 6 institutions diagnosed with GEP-NETs, as outlined in the approved indication for [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, were enrolled. Safety was the primary objective, whereas effectiveness was a secondary objective. In this article, findings were analyzed and compared with the NETTER-1 and NETTER-2 trials. <b>Results:</b> Baseline characteristics were comparable to NETTER-1 and NETTER-2 except for the notably high proportion of G2 (77.1%) among participants. Less than half of patients (41.0%) completed four cycles of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE treatment, presenting a lower portion of completion rate compared to 75.7% in NETTER-1 and 87.8% in NETTER-2. Among the 83 patients, 60 patients (72.3%, 239 cases) had at least 1 AE, with 6 patients (7.2%, 8 cases) experiencing SAEs. The most common AE was nausea (34.9%, 46 cases), and most AEs were mild in severity (94.6%, 226 cases). Overall, the safety profile in this study presented minimal differences from NETTER-1 and NETTER-2. This study reports 37.7% of ORR which was between 14.7% in NETTER-1 and 43.0% in NETTER-2. <b>Conclusions:</b> This nationwide post-marketing surveillance study complemented the safety and effectiveness of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE among Koreans, which was not probed in two pivotal trials. The data would support the clinical implication of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE for the GEP-NETs treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancers\",\"volume\":\"17 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468193/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17182992\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17182992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:本上市后监测研究旨在评估[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE在韩国GEP-NETs患者中的安全性和有效性。方法:从2020年7月至2024年7月,根据[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE的批准适应症,共纳入6家机构诊断为GEP-NETs的89例患者。安全性是首要目标,而有效性是次要目标。在本文中,研究结果进行了分析,并与NETTER-1和NETTER-2试验进行了比较。结果:基线特征与NETTER-1和NETTER-2相当,除了参与者中G2的比例显着高(77.1%)。不到一半的患者(41.0%)完成了四个周期的[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE治疗,完成率低于NETTER-1组的75.7%和NETTER-2组的87.8%。83例患者中,60例(72.3%,239例)至少发生1次AE, 6例(7.2%,8例)发生SAEs。最常见的AE是恶心(34.9%,46例),AE的严重程度以轻度为主(94.6%,226例)。总的来说,本研究的安全性与net -1和net -2的差异很小。本研究报告的ORR为37.7%,其中NETTER-1组为14.7%,NETTER-2组为43.0%。结论:这项全国性的上市后监测研究补充了[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE在韩国人中的安全性和有效性,没有在两项关键试验中进行探讨。这些数据将支持[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE在GEP-NETs治疗中的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First Real-World Evidence on the Safety and Effectiveness of LutatheraTM for Treating Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs): Insights from Post-Marketing Surveillance.

Background/Objectives: This post-marketing surveillance study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in patients with GEP-NETs in real-world practice in South Korea. Methods: From July 2020 to July 2024, a total of 89 patients from 6 institutions diagnosed with GEP-NETs, as outlined in the approved indication for [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, were enrolled. Safety was the primary objective, whereas effectiveness was a secondary objective. In this article, findings were analyzed and compared with the NETTER-1 and NETTER-2 trials. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable to NETTER-1 and NETTER-2 except for the notably high proportion of G2 (77.1%) among participants. Less than half of patients (41.0%) completed four cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE treatment, presenting a lower portion of completion rate compared to 75.7% in NETTER-1 and 87.8% in NETTER-2. Among the 83 patients, 60 patients (72.3%, 239 cases) had at least 1 AE, with 6 patients (7.2%, 8 cases) experiencing SAEs. The most common AE was nausea (34.9%, 46 cases), and most AEs were mild in severity (94.6%, 226 cases). Overall, the safety profile in this study presented minimal differences from NETTER-1 and NETTER-2. This study reports 37.7% of ORR which was between 14.7% in NETTER-1 and 43.0% in NETTER-2. Conclusions: This nationwide post-marketing surveillance study complemented the safety and effectiveness of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE among Koreans, which was not probed in two pivotal trials. The data would support the clinical implication of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE for the GEP-NETs treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信