Yong-Il Kim, Hoon Young Suh, Yehrim Kang, Hojin Cho, Seung Hyup Hyun, Yoo Sung Song, Seunggyun Ha, Keon Wook Kang
{"title":"首个关于LutatheraTM治疗胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤(GEP-NETs)安全性和有效性的真实证据:来自上市后监测的见解。","authors":"Yong-Il Kim, Hoon Young Suh, Yehrim Kang, Hojin Cho, Seung Hyup Hyun, Yoo Sung Song, Seunggyun Ha, Keon Wook Kang","doi":"10.3390/cancers17182992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> This post-marketing surveillance study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in patients with GEP-NETs in real-world practice in South Korea. <b>Methods:</b> From July 2020 to July 2024, a total of 89 patients from 6 institutions diagnosed with GEP-NETs, as outlined in the approved indication for [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, were enrolled. Safety was the primary objective, whereas effectiveness was a secondary objective. In this article, findings were analyzed and compared with the NETTER-1 and NETTER-2 trials. <b>Results:</b> Baseline characteristics were comparable to NETTER-1 and NETTER-2 except for the notably high proportion of G2 (77.1%) among participants. Less than half of patients (41.0%) completed four cycles of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE treatment, presenting a lower portion of completion rate compared to 75.7% in NETTER-1 and 87.8% in NETTER-2. Among the 83 patients, 60 patients (72.3%, 239 cases) had at least 1 AE, with 6 patients (7.2%, 8 cases) experiencing SAEs. The most common AE was nausea (34.9%, 46 cases), and most AEs were mild in severity (94.6%, 226 cases). Overall, the safety profile in this study presented minimal differences from NETTER-1 and NETTER-2. This study reports 37.7% of ORR which was between 14.7% in NETTER-1 and 43.0% in NETTER-2. <b>Conclusions:</b> This nationwide post-marketing surveillance study complemented the safety and effectiveness of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE among Koreans, which was not probed in two pivotal trials. The data would support the clinical implication of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE for the GEP-NETs treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First Real-World Evidence on the Safety and Effectiveness of Lutathera<sup>TM</sup> for Treating Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs): Insights from Post-Marketing Surveillance.\",\"authors\":\"Yong-Il Kim, Hoon Young Suh, Yehrim Kang, Hojin Cho, Seung Hyup Hyun, Yoo Sung Song, Seunggyun Ha, Keon Wook Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cancers17182992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> This post-marketing surveillance study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in patients with GEP-NETs in real-world practice in South Korea. <b>Methods:</b> From July 2020 to July 2024, a total of 89 patients from 6 institutions diagnosed with GEP-NETs, as outlined in the approved indication for [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, were enrolled. Safety was the primary objective, whereas effectiveness was a secondary objective. In this article, findings were analyzed and compared with the NETTER-1 and NETTER-2 trials. <b>Results:</b> Baseline characteristics were comparable to NETTER-1 and NETTER-2 except for the notably high proportion of G2 (77.1%) among participants. Less than half of patients (41.0%) completed four cycles of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE treatment, presenting a lower portion of completion rate compared to 75.7% in NETTER-1 and 87.8% in NETTER-2. Among the 83 patients, 60 patients (72.3%, 239 cases) had at least 1 AE, with 6 patients (7.2%, 8 cases) experiencing SAEs. The most common AE was nausea (34.9%, 46 cases), and most AEs were mild in severity (94.6%, 226 cases). Overall, the safety profile in this study presented minimal differences from NETTER-1 and NETTER-2. This study reports 37.7% of ORR which was between 14.7% in NETTER-1 and 43.0% in NETTER-2. <b>Conclusions:</b> This nationwide post-marketing surveillance study complemented the safety and effectiveness of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE among Koreans, which was not probed in two pivotal trials. The data would support the clinical implication of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE for the GEP-NETs treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancers\",\"volume\":\"17 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468193/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17182992\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17182992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
First Real-World Evidence on the Safety and Effectiveness of LutatheraTM for Treating Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs): Insights from Post-Marketing Surveillance.
Background/Objectives: This post-marketing surveillance study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in patients with GEP-NETs in real-world practice in South Korea. Methods: From July 2020 to July 2024, a total of 89 patients from 6 institutions diagnosed with GEP-NETs, as outlined in the approved indication for [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, were enrolled. Safety was the primary objective, whereas effectiveness was a secondary objective. In this article, findings were analyzed and compared with the NETTER-1 and NETTER-2 trials. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable to NETTER-1 and NETTER-2 except for the notably high proportion of G2 (77.1%) among participants. Less than half of patients (41.0%) completed four cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE treatment, presenting a lower portion of completion rate compared to 75.7% in NETTER-1 and 87.8% in NETTER-2. Among the 83 patients, 60 patients (72.3%, 239 cases) had at least 1 AE, with 6 patients (7.2%, 8 cases) experiencing SAEs. The most common AE was nausea (34.9%, 46 cases), and most AEs were mild in severity (94.6%, 226 cases). Overall, the safety profile in this study presented minimal differences from NETTER-1 and NETTER-2. This study reports 37.7% of ORR which was between 14.7% in NETTER-1 and 43.0% in NETTER-2. Conclusions: This nationwide post-marketing surveillance study complemented the safety and effectiveness of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE among Koreans, which was not probed in two pivotal trials. The data would support the clinical implication of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE for the GEP-NETs treatment.
期刊介绍:
Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.