Hiroshi Shimizu, Rei Suzuki, Hiroyuki Asama, Kentaro Sato, Kento Osawa, Rei Ohira, Keisuke Kudo, Mitsuru Sugimoto, Hiromasa Ohira
{"title":"胆道癌液体活检检测可操作基因组改变的相关因素。","authors":"Hiroshi Shimizu, Rei Suzuki, Hiroyuki Asama, Kentaro Sato, Kento Osawa, Rei Ohira, Keisuke Kudo, Mitsuru Sugimoto, Hiromasa Ohira","doi":"10.3390/cancers17183071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Blood-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP), a form of liquid biopsy, is often used for biliary tract cancer (BTC) when tissue-based CGP (tissue CGP) is unavailable, despite lower detection rates. This study explored factors linked to detecting actionable genomic alterations to optimize its use. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively analyzed BTC cases in Japan's C-CAT (June 2019-January 2025), restricting panel comparisons to FoundationOne<sup>®</sup> CDx (F1; n = 5019) and FoundationOne<sup>®</sup> Liquid CDx (F1L; n = 1550). Missing covariates were handled by multiple imputations (m = 20). Between-panel balance used 1:1 propensity-score matching (caliper 0.2). Outcomes were modeled with logistic regression. Targets included MSI-H, TMB-H, <i>FGFR2</i>/<i>RET</i>/<i>NTRK</i> fusions, <i>BRAF</i> V600E, <i>KRAS</i> G12C, <i>IDH1</i> mutations, and <i>ERBB2</i> amplification. An exploratory analysis stratified results by the number of prespecified enrichment factors (0-4). Liquid biopsy was performed using plasma-based comprehensive genomic profiling assays (FoundationOne<sup>®</sup> Liquid). <b>Results</b>: Missingness was low; after matching (n = 1549 per group) covariates were well balanced (all|SMD|≤0.05). Detection of any actionable alteration was lower with F1L than F1 (16.8% vs. 24.8%; OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.75; <i>p</i> < 0.001). F1L also had lower TMB-H (OR 0.62, 0.43-0.90; <i>p</i> = 0.01) and <i>ERBB2</i> amplification (OR 0.42, 0.31-0.57; <i>p</i> < 0.001), with no significant differences for MSI-H, <i>IDH1</i>, <i>KRAS</i> G12C, or <i>BRAF</i> V600E. Within F1L, non-perihilar location (OR 2.05), liver (1.90), lymph-node (1.41), and lung metastases (1.52) predicted detection of actionable genomic alterations. F1L detection increased from 5.8% (zero factors) to 32.8% (four factors), approximating tissue at three factors. <b>Conclusions</b>: The utility of liquid biopsy can be maximized by carefully selecting samples on the basis of conditions that increase the detection rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Associated with the Detection of Actionable Genomic Alterations Using Liquid Biopsy in Biliary Tract Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroshi Shimizu, Rei Suzuki, Hiroyuki Asama, Kentaro Sato, Kento Osawa, Rei Ohira, Keisuke Kudo, Mitsuru Sugimoto, Hiromasa Ohira\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cancers17183071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Blood-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP), a form of liquid biopsy, is often used for biliary tract cancer (BTC) when tissue-based CGP (tissue CGP) is unavailable, despite lower detection rates. This study explored factors linked to detecting actionable genomic alterations to optimize its use. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively analyzed BTC cases in Japan's C-CAT (June 2019-January 2025), restricting panel comparisons to FoundationOne<sup>®</sup> CDx (F1; n = 5019) and FoundationOne<sup>®</sup> Liquid CDx (F1L; n = 1550). Missing covariates were handled by multiple imputations (m = 20). Between-panel balance used 1:1 propensity-score matching (caliper 0.2). Outcomes were modeled with logistic regression. Targets included MSI-H, TMB-H, <i>FGFR2</i>/<i>RET</i>/<i>NTRK</i> fusions, <i>BRAF</i> V600E, <i>KRAS</i> G12C, <i>IDH1</i> mutations, and <i>ERBB2</i> amplification. An exploratory analysis stratified results by the number of prespecified enrichment factors (0-4). Liquid biopsy was performed using plasma-based comprehensive genomic profiling assays (FoundationOne<sup>®</sup> Liquid). <b>Results</b>: Missingness was low; after matching (n = 1549 per group) covariates were well balanced (all|SMD|≤0.05). Detection of any actionable alteration was lower with F1L than F1 (16.8% vs. 24.8%; OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.75; <i>p</i> < 0.001). F1L also had lower TMB-H (OR 0.62, 0.43-0.90; <i>p</i> = 0.01) and <i>ERBB2</i> amplification (OR 0.42, 0.31-0.57; <i>p</i> < 0.001), with no significant differences for MSI-H, <i>IDH1</i>, <i>KRAS</i> G12C, or <i>BRAF</i> V600E. Within F1L, non-perihilar location (OR 2.05), liver (1.90), lymph-node (1.41), and lung metastases (1.52) predicted detection of actionable genomic alterations. F1L detection increased from 5.8% (zero factors) to 32.8% (four factors), approximating tissue at three factors. <b>Conclusions</b>: The utility of liquid biopsy can be maximized by carefully selecting samples on the basis of conditions that increase the detection rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancers\",\"volume\":\"17 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468581/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17183071\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17183071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:基于血液的综合基因组谱(CGP)是液体活检的一种形式,通常用于胆道癌(BTC),当基于组织的CGP(组织CGP)不可用时,尽管检出率较低。本研究探讨了与检测可操作的基因组改变相关的因素,以优化其使用。方法:回顾性分析日本C-CAT(2019年6月- 2025年1月)的BTC病例,限制面板比较FoundationOne®CDx (F1, n = 5019)和FoundationOne®Liquid CDx (F1L, n = 1550)。缺失的协变量通过多次插值处理(m = 20)。面板间平衡使用1:1的倾向-得分匹配(卡尺0.2)。结果采用逻辑回归建模。靶点包括MSI-H、TMB-H、FGFR2/RET/NTRK融合、BRAF V600E、KRAS G12C、IDH1突变和ERBB2扩增。探索性分析通过预先指定的富集因子(0-4)的数量对结果进行分层。液体活检采用基于血浆的综合基因组分析(FoundationOne®Liquid)。结果:漏诊率低;匹配后(每组n = 1549)协变量平衡良好(|SMD|均≤0.05)。F1L对任何可操作改变的检出率低于F1(16.8%比24.8%;OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.75; p < 0.001)。F1L也有较低的TMB-H (OR 0.62, 0.43-0.90, p = 0.01)和ERBB2扩增(OR 0.42, 0.31-0.57, p < 0.001), MSI-H、IDH1、KRAS G12C和BRAF V600E无显著差异。在F1L中,非门周位置(OR 2.05)、肝脏(OR 1.90)、淋巴结(OR 1.41)和肺转移(OR 1.52)预测了可操作的基因组改变的检测。F1L检出率从5.8%(零因素)增加到32.8%(四因素),接近组织在三个因素。结论:在提高检出率的条件下,仔细选择样本,可以最大限度地发挥液体活检的效用。
Factors Associated with the Detection of Actionable Genomic Alterations Using Liquid Biopsy in Biliary Tract Cancer.
Background: Blood-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP), a form of liquid biopsy, is often used for biliary tract cancer (BTC) when tissue-based CGP (tissue CGP) is unavailable, despite lower detection rates. This study explored factors linked to detecting actionable genomic alterations to optimize its use. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed BTC cases in Japan's C-CAT (June 2019-January 2025), restricting panel comparisons to FoundationOne® CDx (F1; n = 5019) and FoundationOne® Liquid CDx (F1L; n = 1550). Missing covariates were handled by multiple imputations (m = 20). Between-panel balance used 1:1 propensity-score matching (caliper 0.2). Outcomes were modeled with logistic regression. Targets included MSI-H, TMB-H, FGFR2/RET/NTRK fusions, BRAF V600E, KRAS G12C, IDH1 mutations, and ERBB2 amplification. An exploratory analysis stratified results by the number of prespecified enrichment factors (0-4). Liquid biopsy was performed using plasma-based comprehensive genomic profiling assays (FoundationOne® Liquid). Results: Missingness was low; after matching (n = 1549 per group) covariates were well balanced (all|SMD|≤0.05). Detection of any actionable alteration was lower with F1L than F1 (16.8% vs. 24.8%; OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.75; p < 0.001). F1L also had lower TMB-H (OR 0.62, 0.43-0.90; p = 0.01) and ERBB2 amplification (OR 0.42, 0.31-0.57; p < 0.001), with no significant differences for MSI-H, IDH1, KRAS G12C, or BRAF V600E. Within F1L, non-perihilar location (OR 2.05), liver (1.90), lymph-node (1.41), and lung metastases (1.52) predicted detection of actionable genomic alterations. F1L detection increased from 5.8% (zero factors) to 32.8% (four factors), approximating tissue at three factors. Conclusions: The utility of liquid biopsy can be maximized by carefully selecting samples on the basis of conditions that increase the detection rate.
期刊介绍:
Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.