基于脑电图的机器学习在阅读障碍和自闭症谱系障碍中的生物标志物检测:模型、特征和诊断效用的比较回顾。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Günet Eroğlu
{"title":"基于脑电图的机器学习在阅读障碍和自闭症谱系障碍中的生物标志物检测:模型、特征和诊断效用的比较回顾。","authors":"Günet Eroğlu","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15182388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To uncover neurobiological indicators related to autism spectrum disorders and developmental dyslexia, this article gives a full overview of the most recent advances in machine learning and deep learning methods based on electroencephalography. We look into methodological pipelines that include signal gathering, preprocessing, feature engineering, model selection, and interpretability procedures. We based these pipelines on 15 peer-reviewed research papers published between 2013 and 2025. Most of the research employed the 10-20 system for resting-state EEG and followed MATLAB, MNE-Python, or EEGLAB guidelines for preprocessing. The feature sets included spectral power, functional connectivity, task-evoked potentials, and entropy measures. People used many standard ML methods, such as support vector machines and random forests, as well as more advanced models, like deep neural networks and transformer-based architectures. Several studies found that both dyslexic and ASD groups did well at classifying, with accuracy scores between 82% and 99.2%. The new models could be used in therapeutic settings, but there are still problems with how easy they are to understand and how well they apply to a wide range of situations. This is especially true for ASD because its spectrum is so varied.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electroencephalography-Based Machine Learning for Biomarker Detection in Dyslexia and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comparative Review of Models, Features, and Diagnostic Utility.\",\"authors\":\"Günet Eroğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15182388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To uncover neurobiological indicators related to autism spectrum disorders and developmental dyslexia, this article gives a full overview of the most recent advances in machine learning and deep learning methods based on electroencephalography. We look into methodological pipelines that include signal gathering, preprocessing, feature engineering, model selection, and interpretability procedures. We based these pipelines on 15 peer-reviewed research papers published between 2013 and 2025. Most of the research employed the 10-20 system for resting-state EEG and followed MATLAB, MNE-Python, or EEGLAB guidelines for preprocessing. The feature sets included spectral power, functional connectivity, task-evoked potentials, and entropy measures. People used many standard ML methods, such as support vector machines and random forests, as well as more advanced models, like deep neural networks and transformer-based architectures. Several studies found that both dyslexic and ASD groups did well at classifying, with accuracy scores between 82% and 99.2%. The new models could be used in therapeutic settings, but there are still problems with how easy they are to understand and how well they apply to a wide range of situations. This is especially true for ASD because its spectrum is so varied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468693/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15182388\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15182388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了揭示自闭症谱系障碍和发展性阅读障碍相关的神经生物学指标,本文全面概述了基于脑电图的机器学习和深度学习方法的最新进展。我们研究了包括信号收集、预处理、特征工程、模型选择和可解释性程序在内的方法管道。我们根据2013年至2025年间发表的15篇同行评议研究论文建立了这些管道。大多数研究采用10-20系统进行静息状态EEG,并遵循MATLAB、MNE-Python或EEGLAB准则进行预处理。特征集包括频谱功率、功能连通性、任务诱发电位和熵测度。人们使用了许多标准的机器学习方法,如支持向量机和随机森林,以及更高级的模型,如深度神经网络和基于变压器的架构。几项研究发现,阅读困难和自闭症谱系障碍组在分类方面表现良好,准确率在82%到99.2%之间。这些新模型可以用于治疗环境,但它们是否容易理解以及它们如何适用于广泛的情况仍然存在问题。对于自闭症谱系障碍来说尤其如此,因为它的谱系是如此多样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electroencephalography-Based Machine Learning for Biomarker Detection in Dyslexia and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comparative Review of Models, Features, and Diagnostic Utility.

To uncover neurobiological indicators related to autism spectrum disorders and developmental dyslexia, this article gives a full overview of the most recent advances in machine learning and deep learning methods based on electroencephalography. We look into methodological pipelines that include signal gathering, preprocessing, feature engineering, model selection, and interpretability procedures. We based these pipelines on 15 peer-reviewed research papers published between 2013 and 2025. Most of the research employed the 10-20 system for resting-state EEG and followed MATLAB, MNE-Python, or EEGLAB guidelines for preprocessing. The feature sets included spectral power, functional connectivity, task-evoked potentials, and entropy measures. People used many standard ML methods, such as support vector machines and random forests, as well as more advanced models, like deep neural networks and transformer-based architectures. Several studies found that both dyslexic and ASD groups did well at classifying, with accuracy scores between 82% and 99.2%. The new models could be used in therapeutic settings, but there are still problems with how easy they are to understand and how well they apply to a wide range of situations. This is especially true for ASD because its spectrum is so varied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信