Enrico Oddone, Luca D'Amato, Roberta Pernetti, Domenico Madeo, Luca Toschi, Sara Farinatti, Giulia Riva, Lucrezia Spina, Luigia Ferrante, Catharina Conde, Laura Deborah Locati, Federico Sottotetti, Franca Barbic
{"title":"肺癌中职业性致癌物暴露和非癌基因成瘾表型:来自现实观察研究的结果。","authors":"Enrico Oddone, Luca D'Amato, Roberta Pernetti, Domenico Madeo, Luca Toschi, Sara Farinatti, Giulia Riva, Lucrezia Spina, Luigia Ferrante, Catharina Conde, Laura Deborah Locati, Federico Sottotetti, Franca Barbic","doi":"10.3390/cancers17182997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Lung cancer (LC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide, with both environmental and occupational exposures contributing to its incidence. While oncogene-addicted tumors-defined by single driver mutations-have garnered attention due to their therapeutic implications, less is known about the mutational landscape of tumors potentially arising from occupational exposure to carcinogens. This real-life observational study aimed to assess whether previous occupational exposure to lung carcinogens correlates with distinct LC phenotypes, particularly non-oncogene-addicted (nOA) profiles. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 199 LC patients were enrolled across two specialized oncology centers in Northern Italy between 2021 and 2023. Each participant underwent detailed occupational history taking and molecular characterization using next-generation sequencing. Patients were stratified into nonexposed (NE), low exposed (LE), and high exposed (HE) to carcinogens for lung based on standardized questionnaires and sector-specific assessments. <b>Results</b>: No significant differences were found in histological subtypes across exposure groups. However, people with adenocarcinoma and high occupational exposure to lung carcinogens were more frequently characterized by a nOA phenotype compared to those with low occupational exposure. Logistic regression models-adjusted for age, sex, and smoking habits-confirmed that HE patients had a significantly higher likelihood of developing nOA tumors (OR = 3.07; 95% CI: 1.16-8.11; <i>p</i> = 0.023). This association persisted after adjusting for smoking habits Exposures occurring 5-10 years before diagnosis seemed to be associated with an increased nOA profile. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings suggest that high levels of exposure to occupational carcinogens impact LC phenotypes. Indeed, these phenotypes are more complex to treat and show the worst prognosis. Assessing the occupational exposure to lung carcinogens during work may offer prognostic insights and support the request for more adequate compensation for the patients. Further studies are warranted to validate these results and to explain the mechanisms that produce the differences observed in LC phenotypes in people with high exposure to occupational carcinogens.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exposure to Occupational Carcinogens and Non-Oncogene Addicted Phenotype in Lung Cancer: Results from a Real-Life Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Enrico Oddone, Luca D'Amato, Roberta Pernetti, Domenico Madeo, Luca Toschi, Sara Farinatti, Giulia Riva, Lucrezia Spina, Luigia Ferrante, Catharina Conde, Laura Deborah Locati, Federico Sottotetti, Franca Barbic\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cancers17182997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Lung cancer (LC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide, with both environmental and occupational exposures contributing to its incidence. While oncogene-addicted tumors-defined by single driver mutations-have garnered attention due to their therapeutic implications, less is known about the mutational landscape of tumors potentially arising from occupational exposure to carcinogens. This real-life observational study aimed to assess whether previous occupational exposure to lung carcinogens correlates with distinct LC phenotypes, particularly non-oncogene-addicted (nOA) profiles. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 199 LC patients were enrolled across two specialized oncology centers in Northern Italy between 2021 and 2023. Each participant underwent detailed occupational history taking and molecular characterization using next-generation sequencing. Patients were stratified into nonexposed (NE), low exposed (LE), and high exposed (HE) to carcinogens for lung based on standardized questionnaires and sector-specific assessments. <b>Results</b>: No significant differences were found in histological subtypes across exposure groups. However, people with adenocarcinoma and high occupational exposure to lung carcinogens were more frequently characterized by a nOA phenotype compared to those with low occupational exposure. Logistic regression models-adjusted for age, sex, and smoking habits-confirmed that HE patients had a significantly higher likelihood of developing nOA tumors (OR = 3.07; 95% CI: 1.16-8.11; <i>p</i> = 0.023). This association persisted after adjusting for smoking habits Exposures occurring 5-10 years before diagnosis seemed to be associated with an increased nOA profile. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings suggest that high levels of exposure to occupational carcinogens impact LC phenotypes. Indeed, these phenotypes are more complex to treat and show the worst prognosis. Assessing the occupational exposure to lung carcinogens during work may offer prognostic insights and support the request for more adequate compensation for the patients. Further studies are warranted to validate these results and to explain the mechanisms that produce the differences observed in LC phenotypes in people with high exposure to occupational carcinogens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancers\",\"volume\":\"17 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468263/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17182997\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17182997","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的:肺癌(LC)仍然是世界范围内最致命的恶性肿瘤之一,其发病率与环境和职业暴露有关。虽然癌基因成瘾肿瘤(由单一驱动突变定义)因其治疗意义而引起了人们的关注,但人们对职业接触致癌物可能引起的肿瘤突变情况知之甚少。这项现实生活中的观察性研究旨在评估以前的职业暴露于肺癌物质是否与不同的LC表型相关,特别是非癌基因成瘾(nOA)谱。方法:在2021年至2023年期间,在意大利北部的两个专业肿瘤中心共招募了199名LC患者。每个参与者都进行了详细的职业史记录和使用下一代测序的分子表征。根据标准化问卷调查和行业特定评估,将患者分为非暴露(NE)、低暴露(LE)和高暴露(HE)。结果:各暴露组间组织学亚型无显著差异。然而,与低职业暴露者相比,腺癌和高职业暴露于肺癌致癌物的人更常表现为nOA表型。经年龄、性别和吸烟习惯调整后的Logistic回归模型证实,HE患者发生nOA肿瘤的可能性明显更高(OR = 3.07; 95% CI: 1.16-8.11; p = 0.023)。在调整吸烟习惯后,这种关联仍然存在,诊断前5-10年的暴露似乎与nOA增加有关。结论:这些发现表明,高水平的职业性致癌物暴露会影响LC表型。事实上,这些表型更难治疗,预后也最差。评估工作中职业性暴露于致癌物可能提供预后见解,并支持对患者进行更充分补偿的要求。需要进一步的研究来验证这些结果,并解释在职业性致癌物高暴露人群中产生LC表型差异的机制。
Exposure to Occupational Carcinogens and Non-Oncogene Addicted Phenotype in Lung Cancer: Results from a Real-Life Observational Study.
Background/Objectives: Lung cancer (LC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide, with both environmental and occupational exposures contributing to its incidence. While oncogene-addicted tumors-defined by single driver mutations-have garnered attention due to their therapeutic implications, less is known about the mutational landscape of tumors potentially arising from occupational exposure to carcinogens. This real-life observational study aimed to assess whether previous occupational exposure to lung carcinogens correlates with distinct LC phenotypes, particularly non-oncogene-addicted (nOA) profiles. Methods: A total of 199 LC patients were enrolled across two specialized oncology centers in Northern Italy between 2021 and 2023. Each participant underwent detailed occupational history taking and molecular characterization using next-generation sequencing. Patients were stratified into nonexposed (NE), low exposed (LE), and high exposed (HE) to carcinogens for lung based on standardized questionnaires and sector-specific assessments. Results: No significant differences were found in histological subtypes across exposure groups. However, people with adenocarcinoma and high occupational exposure to lung carcinogens were more frequently characterized by a nOA phenotype compared to those with low occupational exposure. Logistic regression models-adjusted for age, sex, and smoking habits-confirmed that HE patients had a significantly higher likelihood of developing nOA tumors (OR = 3.07; 95% CI: 1.16-8.11; p = 0.023). This association persisted after adjusting for smoking habits Exposures occurring 5-10 years before diagnosis seemed to be associated with an increased nOA profile. Conclusions: These findings suggest that high levels of exposure to occupational carcinogens impact LC phenotypes. Indeed, these phenotypes are more complex to treat and show the worst prognosis. Assessing the occupational exposure to lung carcinogens during work may offer prognostic insights and support the request for more adequate compensation for the patients. Further studies are warranted to validate these results and to explain the mechanisms that produce the differences observed in LC phenotypes in people with high exposure to occupational carcinogens.
期刊介绍:
Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.